Mayflower District Court
#kingvictor1000-v-kingley-napely
This is the start of #kingvictor1000-v-kingley-napely channel.
clerkFlow pinned a message to this channel.2026-01-18 03:00 p.m.
krabz used /add
clerkFlow Bot2025-03-03 05:44 p.m. @krabz has added @spedvictor to the case channel.
Case Modified
krabz used /add
clerkFlow Bot2025-03-03 05:44 p.m. @krabz has added @Reapers to the case channel.
Case Modified
Reapers 2025-03-03 06:19 p.m.@singhski Recusing?
Reapers
Singhski 2025-03-04 02:18 a.m.
I think it’s necessary to avoid the appearance of impropriety and our canons as well as the constitutional interpretation of refusals vaguely mention something similar to our situation.
Reapers 2025-03-04 02:21 a.m.
I agree fully, it's our duty to avoid any appearances of impropriety and to maintain the integrity of the judicial canons as well as any such constitutional interpretations.
Reapers 2025-03-04 02:24 a.m.
In any case, congratulations on the judgeship and godspeed, your honor
ReapersIn any case, congratulations on the judgeship and godspeed, your honor
Singhski 2025-03-04 11:04 a.m.
Thank you.
Singhski 2025-03-04 11:45 a.m.@krabz
krabz used /add
clerkFlow Bot2025-03-04 04:04 p.m. @krabz has added @Evexom to the case channel.
Case Modified
krabz 2025-03-04 04:04 p.m.PENDING RE-ASSIGNMNET
Evexom 2025-03-04 04:23 p.m.
This motion was filed alongside my NOA
cc:@Reapers & next judge
cc:
71.39 KB
krabzkrabz 2025-03-04 04:24 p.m.
** re-assignment
krabz** re-assignment
Toby 2025-03-08 07:59 a.m.
When
krabz** re-assignment
Evexom 2025-03-08 10:36 p.m.
When
krabz** re-assignment
Toby 2025-03-09 11:20 a.m.
When
krabz** re-assignment
Evexom 2025-03-09 09:12 p.m.
When
krabz** re-assignment
Toby 2025-03-10 07:35 a.m.
When
krabz** re-assignment
Evexom 2025-03-11 01:39 a.m.
When
EvexomWhen
krabz 2025-03-11 01:39 a.m.
I will do everything tonight
Evexom 2025-03-11 01:39 a.m.
Godbless
krabz 2025-03-11 01:39 a.m.
If you ping me one more time I am sure @morale would take interest in taking on this case
Evexom 2025-03-11 01:39 a.m.
oh
Evexom 2025-03-11 01:39 a.m.
ohno
Evexom 2025-03-11 01:39 a.m.
Thats just cyberbullying right there
EvexomThis motion was filed alongside my NOA cc: @Reapers & next judge
Evexom 2025-03-11 02:30 a.m.@Arthur_Chen Heres our pending motion to dismiss, Plaintiff has yet to file a response.
krabz used /add
clerkFlow Bot2025-03-11 05:56 a.m. @krabz has added @Arthur_Chen to the case channel.
Case Modified
Arthur_Chen 2025-03-11 12:12 p.m.
Alright. @spedvictor when can I expect a response from you?
Arthur_ChenAlright. @spedvictor when can I expect a response from you?
spedvictor 2025-03-11 12:41 p.m.
Good morning, found out earlier this morning that my current counsel works for the Department of Justice now. I am expecting a delay of up to 72 hours to find substitute counsel and respond if that is acceptable. I apologize for further delaying but I hope you can understand the situation, thank you.
spedvictorGood morning, found out earlier this morning that my current counsel works for the Department of Justice now. I am expecting a delay of up to 72 hours to find substitute counsel an...
Evexom 2025-03-11 01:25 p.m.
If this is truly the case we move for sanction against Plaintiffs former counsel. @Arthur_Chen
krabzIf you ping me one more time I am sure @morale would take interest in taking on this case
morale 2025-03-11 02:09 p.m.
I think so
morale 2025-03-11 02:09 p.m.
Yes
morale 2025-03-11 02:09 p.m.
I might do this
EvexomIf this is truly the case we move for sanction against Plaintiffs former counsel. @Arthur_Chen
Reapers 2025-03-11 03:26 p.m.
? I took a job at the doj before this case was assigned
Reapers 2025-03-11 03:27 p.m.
if there’s any sanctions that should be given, it’s not to me because I’ve waited almost a month for this case to be assigned a judge
Evexom 2025-03-11 03:29 p.m.
You still took the case and filed the complaint.
Evexom 2025-03-11 03:30 p.m.
You owed a duty to your client and this Court, but you have instead neglected your duties and instead try to pin the blame on somebody else. Very immature of you and it shows you have no remorse.
Reapers 2025-03-11 03:33 p.m.
I owe no duty to the court because I was not representing the plaintiff as of the moment the case was assigned, and you have no basis to move for sanctions against me because I owe you nothing
Arthur_Chen 2025-03-11 04:14 p.m.
Wow, okay we seriously need some education here
Arthur_Chen 2025-03-11 04:14 p.m.
The idea that you can just abandon your client because the court was taking too long and you found another job is absolutely absurd. @Reapers
Arthur_Chen 2025-03-11 04:15 p.m.
The fact that you left without informing anyone and just waltzed away to become a prosecutor is honestly one of the most retarded things I’ve ever seen
Arthur_ChenThe fact that you left without informing anyone and just waltzed away to become a prosecutor is honestly one of the most retarded things I’ve ever seen
Reapers 2025-03-11 04:17 p.m.
My client was informed and I referred him to a firm who can handle his case
ReapersI owe no duty to the court because I was not representing the plaintiff as of the moment the case was assigned, and you have no basis to move for sanctions against me because I owe...
Evexom 2025-03-11 04:19 p.m.
You in fact, did owe a duty to the court.
Pursuant to Mayfl. Jud. Admin. R. 12(e), you filing the civil complaint served as your appearance within the case. Therefore under 12(f) you are required to file a motion for withdrawal, something you have not done.
Pursuant to Mayfl. Jud. Admin. R. 12(e), you filing the civil complaint served as your appearance within the case. Therefore under 12(f) you are required to file a motion for withdrawal, something you have not done.
ReapersMy client was informed and I referred him to a firm who can handle his case
Arthur_Chen 2025-03-11 04:20 p.m.
We have something called the Rules of Professional Conduct that outline these kinds of things. Admittedly the ones for Clark County are terrible, so much is missing or edited to the point of making no sense, but they still outline when you can withdraw and when you can’t.
Arthur_Chen 2025-03-11 04:20 p.m.
Getting a new job or being so attention-deficient that you can’t wait for a judge assignment isn’t one of the valid reasons.
ReapersMy client was informed and I referred him to a firm who can handle his case
Evexom 2025-03-11 04:22 p.m.
The court wasn't.
spedvictorGood morning, found out earlier this morning that my current counsel works for the Department of Justice now. I am expecting a delay of up to 72 hours to find substitute counsel an...
Arthur_Chen 2025-03-11 04:24 p.m.
The really glaring issue I have is that you only informed your client this morning. This morning after I asked when the response to the dismissal motion was coming in.
Arthur_Chen 2025-03-11 04:25 p.m.
You only communicated your new job with him when something was coming due.(edited)
Arthur_Chen 2025-03-11 04:25 p.m.
What if we had moved forward from there? Would you have simply just not shown up and left your client helpless and alone at trial?(edited)
Evexom 2025-03-11 04:25 p.m.
Past due at this point,
Arthur_Chen 2025-03-11 04:30 p.m.
I'm honestly shocked. This is reason number one thousand and one why the legal community here is in such a terrible state right now and desperately needs serious reform to regain any sense of respectability.
Arthur_Chen 2025-03-11 04:31 p.m.@spedvictor I am very sorry about all this. Yes, you can have the 72 hours to find a new attorney.
Reapers 2025-03-11 04:53 p.m.
Actually, if you look at the complaint, the plaintiff’s representative is Deep Blue Ltd.
Reapers 2025-03-11 04:53 p.m.
therefore @vloqsouls will handle the matter from here shortly
Evexom 2025-03-11 04:54 p.m.
Your honor, it's obvious he doesn't realize the gravity of this situation and will try to weazle his way out of it. We once again ask for sanctions. @Arthur_Chen
Reapers 2025-03-11 04:56 p.m.
For what lol? I’m not the plaintiff’s attorney, his attorney is his law firm
Arthur_Chenspedvictor 2025-03-11 04:59 p.m.
Thank you, your honor.
ReapersFor what lol? I’m not the plaintiff’s attorney, his attorney is his law firm
Evexom 2025-03-11 05:00 p.m.
According to the rules of judicial administration you are still required to file a notice of substitution of counsel.
Evexom 2025-03-11 05:01 p.m.
However you just abandoned your client
EvexomHowever you just abandoned your client
Reapers 2025-03-11 05:03 p.m.
The client has a law firm with practicing attorneys(edited)
Reapers 2025-03-11 05:03 p.m.
and I was only his attorney in my capacity as a firm employee
Reapers 2025-03-11 05:03 p.m.
I was not plaintiff’s attorney when this case was assigned therefore I couldn’t have filed a notice of substitution
Arthur_Chen 2025-03-11 05:39 p.m.
Wow this has gotten from bad to worse
ReapersFor what lol? I’m not the plaintiff’s attorney, his attorney is his law firm
Toby 2025-03-11 05:42 p.m.
?!?!?!?
Toby 2025-03-11 05:42 p.m.
Kingvictor is your firms client
Toby 2025-03-11 05:42 p.m.
You are his attorney
Toby 2025-03-11 05:42 p.m.
Make what you said make sense
TobyKingvictor is your firms client
Reapers 2025-03-11 05:44 p.m.
I don’t work at Deep Blue anymore
ReapersI don’t work at Deep Blue anymore
Toby 2025-03-11 05:44 p.m.
Doesn't matter, you are/were still his attorney
Reapers 2025-03-11 05:44 p.m.
So vloq will handle the matter as the representative of the firm
ReapersSo vloq will handle the matter as the representative of the firm
Toby 2025-03-11 05:45 p.m.
And what if vloq says no?
Toby 2025-03-11 05:45 p.m.
You're still his attorney
TobyAnd what if vloq says no?
Reapers 2025-03-11 05:50 p.m.
Vloq is not gonna say no, I resigned
ReapersVloq is not gonna say no, I resigned
Toby 2025-03-11 05:51 p.m.
And you know that how
TobyAnd you know that how
Reapers 2025-03-11 05:56 p.m.
Because I resigned? as I said, vloq will handle the matter from here as the representative of Deep Blue
ReapersBecause I resigned? as I said, vloq will handle the matter from here as the representative of Deep Blue
Toby 2025-03-11 05:56 p.m.
Have you even spoken to vloq?
Toby 2025-03-11 05:59 p.m.@Arthur_Chen No matter what mixed says, the defence asks that you impose sanctions on the plaintiffs former counsellor. As much as it's abnormal to advocate for the opposing side, I have sympathy for the plaintiff for being abandoned
Reapers 2025-03-11 06:00 p.m.
Yes, I have spoken to vloq
Toby 2025-03-11 06:00 p.m.
You said you referred king to another firm?
Reapers 2025-03-11 06:01 p.m.
What’s abnormal is you being so hellbent on sanctioning me when the client himself never even said anything
Toby 2025-03-11 06:01 p.m.
So only now have you contacted vloq
ReapersWhat’s abnormal is you being so hellbent on sanctioning me when the client himself never even said anything
Toby 2025-03-11 06:01 p.m.
Because having you sanctioned sets the precedent that attorneys can't just up and leave their clients high and dry
TobyYou said you referred king to another firm?
Reapers 2025-03-11 06:01 p.m.
I did recommend him to have a backup in case vloq had a personal situation going on, best to be safe than sorry
Toby 2025-03-11 06:02 p.m.
Not going to lie, what you're saying isn't adding up
TobyBecause having you sanctioned sets the precedent that attorneys can't just up and leave their clients high and dry
Reapers 2025-03-11 06:02 p.m.
Do you have a brain? I literally just said the plaintiff’s attorney is deep blue, not mixedreaper
Toby 2025-03-11 06:02 p.m.
I think you're making somethings up to help mitigate your situation
Reapers 2025-03-11 06:02 p.m.
I was only an employee of the firm, and it was only in that capacity was I his attorney
Reapers 2025-03-11 06:02 p.m.
it’s that simple
ReapersDo you have a brain? I literally just said the plaintiff’s attorney is deep blue, not mixedreaper
Toby 2025-03-11 06:03 p.m.
The insult is not needed. You are his attorney, he's a client of Deep Blue, don't try and lecture me
Reapers 2025-03-11 06:03 p.m.
You’re acting like the plaintiff is without representation, he has his own attorney @vloqsouls
Reapersit’s that simple
Toby 2025-03-11 06:04 p.m.
No it's not, because it's clear that only now you've contacted vloq to help it seem like you've done more to help your client when you abandoned him, frankly I think the court will see right through your deceit
ReapersDo you have a brain? I literally just said the plaintiff’s attorney is deep blue, not mixedreaper
Toby 2025-03-11 06:04 p.m.@Arthur_Chen motion for sanctions for unnecessary insults
Toby 2025-03-11 06:05 p.m.
And unprofessionalism
Toby 2025-03-11 06:05 p.m.
That is not the behavior an officer of the court should be displaying
TobyNo it's not, because it's clear that only now you've contacted vloq to help it seem like you've done more to help your client when you abandoned him, frankly I think the court will...
Reapers 2025-03-11 06:05 p.m.
Do you have any proof to accuse me of something outrageous like this? I really hope you can back this up
ReapersDo you have any proof to accuse me of something outrageous like this? I really hope you can back this up
Toby 2025-03-11 06:05 p.m.
Or what? Because your time line doesn't add up what so ever(edited)
spedvictor 2025-03-11 06:22 p.m.
If you were to ask me my personal opinion on this, @Reapers and Deep Blue has provided good service throughout every step of the way and I have no negative opinion about @Reapers or Deep Blue. Obviously its unfortunate that I have to substitute for another lawyer but I think to say I was “abandoned” is a stretch. @Reapers provided me with resources to sufficiently find a replacement when he resigned. Be it by continuing with Deep Blue or a different firm. Along with the 72 hours i’ve been provided to find replacement I am not really in a difficult situation regarding @Reapers not representing me anymore, It’s pretty early into this and I have sufficient time to find a replacement.
On the contrary, claiming incompetence from my representatives goes both ways; Please look at why this litigation is even being pursued in the first place.
On the contrary, claiming incompetence from my representatives goes both ways; Please look at why this litigation is even being pursued in the first place.
Toby 2025-03-11 06:35 p.m.
I beg your pardon, don't start chucking implied insults towards us, when I've been advocating for you because your attorney just up and left
Toby 2025-03-11 06:37 p.m.
But fine, since you don't think you have been abandoned, then you have that 72 hours, and if you don't find counsel, then we'll cross that bridge when we come to it
TobyI beg your pardon, don't start chucking implied insults towards us, when I've been advocating for you because your attorney just up and left
spedvictor 2025-03-11 07:15 p.m.
I already gave my opinion regarding what my attorney did, If I wanted to condemn @Reapers I would have done it many hours ago. I appreciate your concern towards me, but did you even once stop and consider, let alone ask me what I’ve thought about the entire thing while you were “advocating” for me? I see it as rude that your party has argued regarding my alleged treatment without even seeing what I thought about the whole thing. You don’t know what my thoughts or opinions are either so I find it hard to believe that you knew what I wanted during this advocating of yours.
Toby 2025-03-11 07:41 p.m.
This gives Snowflakes vibes.
TobyThis gives Snowflakes vibes.
spedvictor 2025-03-11 07:45 p.m.
Not really "snowflake vibes". It's just that if you were going to jump to conclusions about what I wanted in regards to your advocating without consulting me; You might as well have been advocating for yourself and your own interests instead of genuinely trying to do whatever you thought was right.
spedvictor 2025-03-11 07:50 p.m.
You want to talk about "don't start chucking implied insults" yet you yourself have resorted to doing exactly that.
spedvictorYou want to talk about "don't start chucking implied insults" yet you yourself have resorted to doing exactly that.
Toby 2025-03-12 05:51 a.m.
No i haven't, and I'm not going to argue with you over it, because this channel has been clogged enough
Toby 2025-03-12 05:52 a.m.
Cc: @Arthur_Chen
Evexom 2025-03-12 12:18 p.m.
Kezzera 2025-03-12 12:47 p.m.
This case is up for reassignment
spedvictor 2025-03-13 10:49 a.m.@huddy. is my new lawyer please add him to the case
cc:@krabz
cc:
krabz used /add
clerkFlow Bot2025-03-13 02:44 p.m. @krabz has added @huddy. to the case channel.
Case Modified
huddy. 2025-03-13 02:45 p.m.
Will file NOA shortly
krabz 2025-03-14 01:37 p.m.
re-assigned to @ryan
krabz 2025-03-14 01:37 p.m.
(due to Mx. Chen's removal)
Evexom 2025-03-14 01:37 p.m.
God bless
EvexomThis motion was filed alongside my NOA cc: @Reapers & next judge
Evexom 2025-03-14 01:38 p.m.@ryan pending MTD and we also moved for sanctions against MixedRepear for abandoning his client and causing delay
huddy. 2025-03-14 02:49 p.m.@ryan Defense will not be responding to the Motion to Dismiss as we wish to refile due to certain technicalities and errors that ocurred at the beginning of the case, so dismissing without prejudice is perfectly valid.
Evexom 2025-03-14 02:52 p.m.
We'd still like a ruling.
Toby 2025-03-14 02:56 p.m.
We'd like a formal response to the motion, and if they fail to, we'd like a dismissal with prejudice
Toby 2025-03-14 03:08 p.m.@ryan Are we allowed to respond?
TobyWe'd like a formal response to the motion, and if they fail to, we'd like a dismissal with prejudice
huddy. 2025-03-14 03:18 p.m. 
huddy. 2025-03-14 03:18 p.m. 
Toby 2025-03-14 03:18 p.m.
Oh I misread
huddy.Click to see attachment.
Evexom 2025-03-14 03:29 p.m.
"Plaintiff asserts that service was either effectuated within this timeframe or that any delay was due to excusable circumstances warranting an extension."
Do you have any proof of this or are you just saying it because it'll help you out?
Do you have any proof of this or are you just saying it because it'll help you out?
Evexom 2025-03-14 03:29 p.m.
Additionally, the rule explicitly states "initial filing", which is the 19th.
ryan 2025-03-14 03:30 p.m.
hai
ryan 2025-03-14 03:32 p.m.
Sigh
ryan used /add
clerkFlow Bot2025-03-14 03:32 p.m. @ryan has added @Reapers to the case channel.
Case Modified
ryan 2025-03-14 03:32 p.m.@Reapers are you with us
Evexomryan 2025-03-14 03:35 p.m.
We're dealing with Mr Reaper first then the MTD
huddy.ryan 2025-03-14 03:36 p.m.
I will dispose of the MTD by allowing leave to refile a civil complaint; no dismissal is needed.
ryan 2025-03-14 03:38 p.m.@huddy. you are granted leave to file a new complaint within 48 hours. This time will expire at end of day 3/16 (CDT)
ryanReapers 2025-03-14 03:41 p.m.
I’m not, the plaintiff’s new attorney is James
ryan 2025-03-14 03:41 p.m.
I am ware
ryan 2025-03-14 03:41 p.m.
aware
ryanhuddy. 2025-03-14 03:42 p.m.
Thank you
ReapersI’m not, the plaintiff’s new attorney is James
ryan 2025-03-14 03:42 p.m.
We'll be discussing your sudden termination of representation
ryan 2025-03-14 03:43 p.m.
I simply need to clarify somethings
ryanWe'll be discussing your sudden termination of representation
huddy. 2025-03-14 03:43 p.m.
Defendant has expressed his wishes to me for MixedReaper not to be sanctioned as he left with good reason and in good faith
ryan 2025-03-14 03:43 p.m.
I am not leaning towards sanctions, but I want to understand, on the record, what occured
ryanWe'll be discussing your sudden termination of representation
Reapers 2025-03-14 03:43 p.m.
What is there to discuss? I resigned from my old firm which represented the plaintiff therefore I was no longer his attorney
ryanhuddy. 2025-03-14 03:43 p.m.
Will our refile being served stamp out any previous dismissal attempt based on the initial serving allegedly not being within the timeframe?
ryan 2025-03-14 03:44 p.m.
Yes
ReapersWhat is there to discuss? I resigned from my old firm which represented the plaintiff therefore I was no longer his attorney
ryan 2025-03-14 03:46 p.m.
If I understand correctly, you took this case, it took a month to be assigned, and during that month you accepted a position at the DoJ, yes?
ryanIf I understand correctly, you took this case, it took a month to be assigned, and during that month you accepted a position at the DoJ, yes?
Reapers 2025-03-14 03:50 p.m.
Yes, during the time it took for assignment, I resigned from my old firm and gave the plaintiff his options for moving forward and I took a job at the DoJ
ReapersYes, during the time it took for assignment, I resigned from my old firm and gave the plaintiff his options for moving forward and I took a job at the DoJ
ryan 2025-03-14 03:50 p.m.
Okay thank you, I apologize for taking up your time; I wanted to make sure all was well
ryan 2025-03-14 03:51 p.m.
Have a good day
Reapers 2025-03-14 03:51 p.m.
No problem, good day, your honor
ryan used /remove
clerkFlow Bot2025-03-14 03:52 p.m. @ryan has removed @Reapers from the case channel.
Case Modified
huddy. 2025-03-16 12:57 p.m.
Refiled
ryan 2025-03-17 06:14 p.m.@Evexom
Evexom 2025-03-17 06:14 p.m.
Would be nice if it was served upon on, seeing as we haven't even had the original one served on us yet.
huddy.Refiled
ryan 2025-03-17 06:14 p.m.
In the future, would you be kind enough to put ur docs
EvexomWould be nice if it was served upon on, seeing as we haven't even had the original one served on us yet.
ryan 2025-03-17 06:14 p.m.
Do you waive service or nah
ryan 2025-03-17 06:15 p.m.
I mean you're here so
ryanIn the future, would you be kind enough to put ur docs
huddy. 2025-03-17 06:15 p.m.
Excuse me?
ryanI mean you're here so
Evexom 2025-03-17 06:16 p.m.
We didn't even get here until four weeks after the case was filed.
ryan 2025-03-17 06:16 p.m.
in the cannel
ryan 2025-03-17 06:16 p.m.
channel
Evexom 2025-03-17 06:16 p.m.
We were never served,
Evexom 2025-03-17 06:16 p.m.
Hence the reason I filed my MTD
EvexomWe didn't even get here until four weeks after the case was filed.
ryan 2025-03-17 06:16 p.m.
Would you like your client to be formally summoned or nah
huddy. 2025-03-17 06:16 p.m.
Hence why we refiled
ryan 2025-03-17 06:16 p.m.
This is a new complaint
huddy. 2025-03-17 06:16 p.m.
So you couldn't bring this up again
huddy.So you couldn't bring this up again
Evexom 2025-03-17 06:16 p.m.
Thats not what the rules state.
Evexom 2025-03-17 06:16 p.m.
The rules state the initial pleading
ryanWould you like your client to be formally summoned or nah
Evexom 2025-03-17 06:16 p.m.
Yes
ryan 2025-03-17 06:16 p.m.
Okay !
ryan 2025-03-17 06:17 p.m.
I will draft a summons
huddy. 2025-03-17 06:17 p.m.
The initial pleading in what case? CR109?
ryan 2025-03-17 06:17 p.m.
James please serve Mr Fliply pursuant with all rules of civil procedures !
huddy. 2025-03-17 06:17 p.m.
You weren't served properly in CR109
huddy. 2025-03-17 06:17 p.m.
Hence why we filed a new case
huddy. 2025-03-17 06:17 p.m.
In which you can be served properly
Evexom 2025-03-17 06:17 p.m.
Are you retarded?
ryan 2025-03-17 06:18 p.m.
Okay
ryan 2025-03-17 06:18 p.m.
Stop
Evexom 2025-03-17 06:18 p.m.
A courtroom doesn't determine the case
ryan 2025-03-17 06:18 p.m.
Stop typing both of you
huddy. 2025-03-17 06:18 p.m.
Your Honor, as a member of the black community, I am deeply insulted and threatened.
huddy. 2025-03-17 06:18 p.m.
I demand that this ableist individual be held in contempt.
ryan 2025-03-17 06:18 p.m.
?order
Dyno Bot2025-03-17 06:18 p.m.
Order!
“Judicial officers are officers of unwavering authority and impartiality.” Minute Order to Hold Defendant in Civil Contempt, at ¶ 1,Kingley Napley v. Adolobee , No. CV-0068-24, (Mayfl. Dist. Ct. Feb. 19 2025) (citing Zrihem, et al. v. TDark99 , 1 Mayfl. ___, ___ (2024) (slip op., at 11) (Cabot, J., dissenting)) (internal quotation marks omitted).
The Court will not tolerate any further disruptions!
“Judicial officers are officers of unwavering authority and impartiality.” Minute Order to Hold Defendant in Civil Contempt, at ¶ 1,
The Court will not tolerate any further disruptions!
huddy.I demand that this ableist individual be held in contempt.
ryan 2025-03-17 06:18 p.m.
When I tell you to stop typing I mean it, or you'll share the same cell Fliply will
ryan 2025-03-17 06:19 p.m.@Evexom Because I am not interesting in handling out contempt, I will allow you to retract your statement and formally apologize to Mr Hamilton
Evexom 2025-03-17 06:20 p.m.@huddy. I apologize you don't know the difference between the case and a courtroom and for my previous statement where I questioned your mental capacity
huddy. 2025-03-17 06:20 p.m.
There's a good boy
huddy. 2025-03-17 06:20 p.m.
Are you willing to formulate proper arguments now instead of resorting to sad name calling?
huddy.There's a good boy
ryan 2025-03-17 06:21 p.m.
Please do not refer to opposing counsel as a good boy
ryan 2025-03-17 06:21 p.m.
Are we ready to handle this like we have graduated from COD lobbies, gentlemen?
ryan 2025-03-17 06:22 p.m.@Evexom who is the licensed owner of the Defendant
Evexom 2025-03-17 06:22 p.m.@Toby
ryan 2025-03-17 06:23 p.m.
Is his name toby or tortfeasor now
Toby 2025-03-17 06:23 p.m.
whats up
ryanIs his name toby or tortfeasor now
Toby 2025-03-17 06:23 p.m.
tortfeasor
ryan 2025-03-17 06:23 p.m.
Thanks toby
Toby 2025-03-17 06:23 p.m.
no probs
ryan 2025-03-17 06:27 p.m.@huddy. please put your updated complaint in this channel
ryan 2025-03-17 06:28 p.m.@Evexom https://gyazo.com/66cedcb394b334ec2589e54b134727cd Your client has been served with a summons
Evexom 2025-03-17 06:28 p.m.
I'm blind now, thank you
ryan 2025-03-17 06:28 p.m.
Blame @Nationgreat
EvexomI'm blind now, thank you
ryan 2025-03-17 06:29 p.m.
You'll have 96 hours to file a responsive pleading after Hamilton uploads the new complaint
ryan 2025-03-17 06:29 p.m.
Is this all clear
Evexom 2025-03-17 06:29 p.m.@Nationgreat Sending my medical bill to you.
ryanIs this all clear
Evexom 2025-03-17 06:29 p.m.
EvexomToby 2025-03-17 06:45 p.m.
same
Toby 2025-03-17 06:45 p.m.
I can't see
Toby 2025-03-17 06:45 p.m.
this is voice to text
ryan 2025-03-17 06:46 p.m.
Just sue Nationgreat
ryan 2025-03-17 06:46 p.m.
huddy. 2025-03-18 03:47 a.m.
huddy.Click to see attachment.
ryan 2025-03-18 01:03 p.m.@Evexom your time starts now
ryanEvexom 2025-03-18 01:23 p.m.
Evexom 2025-03-18 01:36 p.m.@ryan @huddy.
ryan 2025-03-18 01:41 p.m.
Okay
ryan 2025-03-18 01:42 p.m.@huddy. @Evexom
Discovery Order :
Plaintiff is to provide all discovery materials within 48 hours from this message.
Defendant is to provide all discovery materials within 24 hours after the filing of the Plaintiff's discovery, a time not to exceed 72 hours from this message.
Plaintiff is to provide all discovery materials within 48 hours from this message.
Defendant is to provide all discovery materials within 24 hours after the filing of the Plaintiff's discovery, a time not to exceed 72 hours from this message.
ryan pinned a message to this channel.2026-01-18 03:00 p.m.
huddy. 2025-03-18 02:11 p.m.
Thanks suh
huddy. 2025-03-20 12:44 p.m.@ryan May I have a three hour extension as I am not home to submit the file
ryan 2025-03-20 12:57 p.m.
Yes
huddy. 2025-03-20 01:15 p.m.
Thank you suh
huddy. 2025-03-20 04:24 p.m.
Thank you once again
huddy. 2025-03-20 04:24 p.m.
courtesy
ryan 2025-03-20 04:50 p.m.@Evexom 24 hours to submit
ryan 2025-03-20 04:50 p.m.
If any
Evexom 2025-03-20 04:53 p.m.
Evexom 2025-03-21 12:06 a.m.@ryan @huddy. Motion to dismiss in the coming days 1
1Evexomryan 2025-03-21 01:13 a.m.
I dont quite understand why at this stage you'd MTD
ryan 2025-03-21 01:13 a.m.
seems like a pre-response thing given accepting the facts as true and all :/
Evexom 2025-03-21 01:14 a.m.
There’s facts at dispute, motion for summary judgment wouldn’t be appropriate
ryan 2025-03-21 01:32 a.m.
okay ! seems still like sum u shouldve done before a reply
huddy. 2025-03-22 05:25 a.m.@ryan Defense has failed to provide discovery
ryan 2025-03-22 12:45 p.m.
Okay cool
Evexom 2025-03-23 10:28 p.m.
Womp womp
Evexom 2025-03-23 10:29 p.m.
Some of us have jobs and can’t do Lego law full time
Evexom 2025-03-25 05:24 p.m.
Okay, before I move on and put more time into this.
Evexom 2025-03-25 05:24 p.m.
What is actually going on.
Evexom 2025-03-25 05:24 p.m.@huddy. Why are there two cases filed
Evexom 2025-03-25 05:24 p.m.
With the exact same complaint?
huddy. 2025-03-25 05:26 p.m.
That second case is NOT meant to be - that’s a mistake
huddy. 2025-03-25 05:26 p.m.
Nevertheless, where’s your discovery
huddy.That second case is NOT meant to be - that’s a mistake
Evexom 2025-03-25 05:30 p.m.
Okay.
Evexom 2025-03-25 05:30 p.m.
Drop it then
huddy. 2025-03-25 05:34 p.m.
If only if only I had permissions sir
huddy. 2025-03-25 05:34 p.m.
Drop your discovery
huddy. 2025-03-25 05:34 p.m.
Or do you have nothing to present
Evexom 2025-03-25 05:36 p.m.
Trying to find a working version of the ticket transcript since the bot got discontinued
spedvictor 2025-03-27 11:39 p.m.@ryan What's next for this, they've had like a week or more to respond and they haven't submitted anything or asked for an extension. Mainly trying to get this addressed because I don't want them to hold this at a standstill forever and abuse leniency.
ryan 2025-03-27 11:52 p.m.@Evexom do u actually have any to submit
ryanEvexom 2025-03-27 11:58 p.m.
Trying to get toby to export the transcripts as he in the owner of the server
ryan 2025-03-27 11:58 p.m.@Toby
EvexomTrying to get toby to export the transcripts as he in the owner of the server
ryan 2025-03-27 11:59 p.m.
What's the hold up then
Evexom 2025-03-28 12:02 a.m.
The bot requires you to be the owner of the server
Evexom 2025-03-28 12:03 a.m.
He's probably busy with exams like most of us
EvexomHe's probably busy with exams like most of us
ryan 2025-03-28 12:06 a.m.
Lovely
ryan 2025-03-28 12:06 a.m.
as am i
ryan 2025-03-28 12:06 a.m.
but youve had 6 extra days
ryan 2025-03-28 12:06 a.m.
If it is not submitted by the time i exit calc tomorrow (1220 CDT) you're not submitting anything and you'll be showing cause !
Evexom 2025-03-28 12:09 a.m.
Defendant has never even had contact with Plaintiff and the complaint just goes on and rambles about a completely different party.
Evexom 2025-03-28 12:10 a.m. 
Evexom 2025-03-28 12:12 a.m.
Complaint was never even filed in this case and Plaintiff instead filed another case with it so what are we even doing here.
Evexom 2025-03-28 12:12 a.m.
If they want to move forward with another case we ask this one be dismissed. @ryan
ryan 2025-03-28 12:14 a.m.
lol!
ryan 2025-03-28 12:14 a.m.@huddy. buddy
ryan 2025-03-28 12:15 a.m.
thanks for pointing this out now !
EvexomDefendant has never even had contact with Plaintiff and the complaint just goes on and rambles about a completely different party.
ryan 2025-03-28 12:15 a.m.
Guess what you get to do
ryan 2025-03-28 12:15 a.m.
put it on paper
Evexom 2025-03-28 12:17 a.m.
Was already planning on it.
EvexomIf they want to move forward with another case we ask this one be dismissed. @ryan
Evexom 2025-03-28 12:17 a.m.
We ask for this first however
ryan 2025-03-28 12:17 a.m.
clogging up my channel
Evexom 2025-03-28 12:17 a.m.
If you want it on paper I can do that
ryan 2025-03-28 12:17 a.m.
yes
ryan 2025-03-28 12:17 a.m.
absolutely
Evexom 2025-03-28 12:17 a.m.
ryan 2025-03-28 12:17 a.m.
Clogging up my channel 
Evexom 2025-03-28 12:17 a.m.
Ill get it on paper as soon as possible
ryan 2025-03-28 12:17 a.m.
guys
ryan 2025-03-28 12:17 a.m.
chicago white soxs are 1.000 rn
ryan 2025-03-28 12:17 a.m.
they havent lost a game this season !!!
Evexom 2025-03-28 12:18 a.m.
Cubs are better
ryan 2025-03-28 12:18 a.m.
as a cardinals fan
ryan 2025-03-28 12:18 a.m.
terrible
huddy.Click to see attachment.
spedvictor 2025-03-28 12:18 a.m.
When he re-filed I think they made it into another case on accident or something
huddy.That second case is NOT meant to be - that’s a mistake
spedvictor 2025-03-28 12:20 a.m.
Since thats what he’s probably implying here what was implied in the channel ( <#1351424200296103997> )
spedvictor 2025-03-28 12:21 a.m.
* and what
spedvictor 2025-03-28 12:22 a.m.
wow asterisks reformats to bullet
spedvictor 2025-03-28 12:34 a.m.
Can’t speak for my lawyer but I can assume he would probably appreciate it if he had some time to amend the complaint to include the correct username, since its literally just the username from what i’m seeing.
Evexom 2025-03-28 12:35 a.m.
A response has already been filed. Hes already wasted the courts time as well as my own.
spedvictor 2025-03-28 12:37 a.m.
Not trying to clog but I mean you did wait a week past deadline if you want to talk about wasting time
spedvictor 2025-03-28 12:38 a.m.
But I guess its only okay when you do it
ryan 2025-03-28 12:39 a.m.
correct.
spedvictor 2025-03-28 12:55 a.m.@ryan I'm not like an expert on this process but I don't think this is too much of a stretch to do, our complaint would literally change one word probably and our discovery would likely stay the same, they would just change up the response to the complaint a bit and officially submit their discovery
spedvictor 2025-03-28 12:55 a.m.
Tomorrow/Today is Friday and we got the whole weekend
spedvictor 2025-03-28 12:55 a.m.
But I will have to see what my lawyer says officially
spedvictor 2025-03-28 12:55 a.m.
about it
spedvictorEvexom 2025-03-28 01:04 a.m.
One word that changes the entire case.
spedvictor 2025-03-28 01:06 a.m.
I mean I still think its a pretty reasonable argument, I doubt your entire case is riding on the fact that there is a one word mistake
EvexomClick to see attachment.
spedvictor 2025-03-28 01:08 a.m.
Pretty sure I am mentioned as Plaintiff everywhere else in the complaint anyways, obviously besides that 3rd paragraph so I really don't think you were unaware it was meant to be me
huddy. 2025-03-28 03:15 a.m.@ryan Can we amend suh
huddy. 2025-03-28 03:15 a.m.
It's this new filing system
Toby 2025-03-28 05:36 a.m.
I object
Toby 2025-03-28 05:37 a.m.
The new filing system doesn't make you put different names down
Evexom 2025-03-28 01:38 p.m.
^
Evexom 2025-03-28 01:38 p.m.
I got the transcript export, figuring out how to import it into the new system now.
Evexom 2025-03-28 08:34 p.m.@huddy. @ryan May take a few days to get transcripts 
Evexomhuddy. 2025-03-29 02:47 a.m.
I don't understand what this is
Evexom 2025-03-29 02:48 a.m.
Its the import for the transcripts. Down at the bottom "Your Data & Transcripts have been placed in a queue and may take a few days to appear".
Evexom 2025-03-29 02:49 a.m.
The bot we used got discontinued, a former admin took the code and opened their own version. They also made this importer so you can get it on the new bot.
Evexom 2025-03-29 02:49 a.m.
The link you provided in your discovery is broken so we are trying to get a working copy.
Evexom 2025-03-29 02:49 a.m.
Without that we can't verify any other information.
EvexomThe link you provided in your discovery is broken so we are trying to get a working copy.
huddy. 2025-03-29 08:34 a.m.
Oh right thanks
ryan 2025-03-29 08:32 p.m.
okay
ryan 2025-03-29 08:32 p.m.
lets see
Evexomryan 2025-03-29 08:32 p.m.
unacceptable
ryan 2025-03-29 08:32 p.m.
I will not be allowing leave to file discovery
ryan 2025-03-29 08:32 p.m.
Complaint is a harmless error
ryan 2025-03-29 08:32 p.m.@Evexom @huddy.
ryan 2025-03-29 08:33 p.m.
are there any other issues before we procede to trial
ryanare there any other issues before we procede to trial
Evexom 2025-03-29 08:37 p.m.
The issue of them filing a new case. Additionally if they are allowed to amend who the plaintiff is we ask that we are allowed to submit a new response to the complaint.
EvexomThe issue of them filing a new case. Additionally if they are allowed to amend who the plaintiff is we ask that we are allowed to submit a new response to the complaint.
ryan 2025-03-29 08:39 p.m.
Did they file a new case
ryanDid they file a new case
spedvictor 2025-03-29 08:39 p.m.
bro
huddy.That second case is NOT meant to be - that’s a mistake
spedvictor 2025-03-29 08:39 p.m.
He said its a mistake
ryan 2025-03-29 08:41 p.m.
grrrr
huddy.Click to see attachment.
spedvictor 2025-03-29 08:41 p.m.
When he filed they made it into a second channel
spedvictor 2025-03-29 08:41 p.m.
for whatever reason
ryan 2025-03-29 08:42 p.m.
id rather let acer deal with this one
spedvictor 2025-03-29 08:43 p.m.
Can my lawyer fix the complaint first
ryan 2025-03-29 08:43 p.m.
i do not care about the minor defect
ryan 2025-03-29 08:43 p.m.
be so fr
spedvictor 2025-03-29 08:44 p.m.
but just so we can get everything straight
ryan 2025-03-29 08:44 p.m.
fine
ryan 2025-03-29 08:44 p.m.
just refile
ryan 2025-03-29 08:44 p.m.
last chance
ryan 2025-03-29 08:44 p.m.
24 hours
spedvictor 2025-03-29 08:44 p.m.
Alright
ryan 2025-03-29 08:44 p.m.
no fliply will not get another chance
ryanno fliply will not get another chance
Evexom 2025-03-29 08:45 p.m.
So we don’t get a chance to file a new response despite them changing the literal facts of the case?
ryan 2025-03-29 08:46 p.m.
theyre changing a party
ryan 2025-03-29 08:46 p.m.
not a fact
Evexom 2025-03-29 08:46 p.m.
Exactly. We responded based on that party being in this suit.
ryan 2025-03-29 08:46 p.m.
Litigate better
ryan 2025-03-29 08:46 p.m.
You brought up this issue at the end of pretrial
Evexom 2025-03-29 08:46 p.m.
If they are not the plaintiff they are changing the entire case
ryan 2025-03-29 08:47 p.m.
no bc this case operated under the assumption KingVictor1000 is the plaintiff
ryan 2025-03-29 08:47 p.m.
i am not destroying a whole case
ryan 2025-03-29 08:47 p.m.
maybe if u did this before discovery
Evexom 2025-03-29 08:47 p.m.
The complaint listed a completely different party
ryan 2025-03-29 08:47 p.m.
You should've brought that up sooner
ryan 2025-03-29 08:48 p.m.
You will be allowed, in channel, to admit or deny, for the record, the switching of the party
ryan 2025-03-29 08:48 p.m.
You have 12 hours from filing to do that
ryan 2025-03-29 08:48 p.m.
Delay and you will be spending an hour in jail
ryan 2025-03-29 08:52 p.m.
^ per hour u delay
ryan 2025-03-29 08:52 p.m.
I am sick and tired of this case taking this long
ryanYou brought up this issue at the end of pretrial
Evexom 2025-03-29 08:56 p.m.
It wasn’t an issue until just now when you allowed them to change the party
ryan 2025-03-29 08:57 p.m.
You made it an issue, counselor
ryan 2025-03-29 08:57 p.m.
Reasonably so, but I am annoyed it took you this long to bring it to our attention
ryan 2025-03-29 08:57 p.m.
Furthermore, you did it way after your discovery is due
Evexom 2025-03-29 08:59 p.m.
How do you expect us to provide discovery when we had nothing. We tried to do what we could to get the documents but you have instead denied any future filing.
EvexomHow do you expect us to provide discovery when we had nothing. We tried to do what we could to get the documents but you have instead denied any future filing.
ryan 2025-03-29 09:00 p.m.
You could've either said you had nothing or acted with haste in filing the ONE thing you did have
ryan 2025-03-29 09:00 p.m.
You've had over a week
ryan 2025-03-29 09:00 p.m.
You waited until a long time
Evexom 2025-03-29 09:04 p.m.
All of it was outside of my control. The way the system to convert the transcripts works is that it requires that it be the owner of the server who does so.
ryan 2025-03-29 09:06 p.m.
It's your client's fault then
ryanYou will be allowed, in channel, to admit or deny, for the record, the switching of the party
Evexom 2025-03-29 09:44 p.m.
For clarification, are you only allowing us to admit or deny verbally, the party and nothing else in the complaint?
ryan 2025-03-29 09:44 p.m.
yes
ryan 2025-03-29 09:45 p.m.
assuming thats all thats changed
Evexom 2025-03-29 09:45 p.m.
The plaintiff being changed also changes the facts, but nonetheless thank you for the clarification.
EvexomThe plaintiff being changed also changes the facts, but nonetheless thank you for the clarification.
ryan 2025-03-29 09:54 p.m.
the plaintiff is only changing due to a nominal typographic error
ryan 2025-03-29 09:54 p.m.
Please stop blowing this out of proportion
ryanIt's your client's fault then
Toby 2025-03-30 06:56 a.m.
No???
Toby 2025-03-30 06:57 a.m.
I have no control over it taking days to convert the transcript, that is purely down to the bot owner
Toby 2025-03-30 06:58 a.m.@ryan are we allowed an extension for discovery so we can get the transcript converted
huddy. 2025-03-30 08:44 a.m.
@
huddy. 2025-03-30 08:44 a.m.@ryan
huddy. 2025-03-30 08:45 a.m.
Amended CC
Toby 2025-03-30 11:30 a.m.
The request for $650,000 in punitive damages is absolutely outrageous
Toby 2025-03-30 11:30 a.m.
Have we forgotten that the main purpose of the judicial system is to compensate not bankrupt
Toby 2025-03-30 11:31 a.m.
Ok never mind pal
Toby 2025-03-30 11:31 a.m.
1.6ish million
Toby 2025-03-30 11:31 a.m.
are you having a laugh
Toby 2025-03-30 11:33 a.m.
Attorneys try to be reasonable in the amount of damages they request: impossible
Toby 2025-03-30 11:34 a.m.
good luck justifying and explaining how that much is even remotely reasonable, fair and just
huddy.Amended CC
Evexom 2025-03-30 02:26 p.m.
Would be nice if you would ping me when sending documents.
huddy. 2025-03-30 02:26 p.m.
Would it
Tobygood luck justifying and explaining how that much is even remotely reasonable, fair and just
huddy. 2025-03-30 02:27 p.m.
Thank you!
Evexom 2025-03-30 02:28 p.m.@ryan Defendant admits to the amended Plaintiff in the complaint
Evexom 2025-03-30 02:29 p.m.
Could you go ahead and actually file this complaint? Seeing as the last one wasn’t even filed in this case. @huddy.
huddy. 2025-03-30 02:34 p.m.
Submitted
Tobyryan 2025-03-30 02:55 p.m.
When did you start the process
ryan 2025-03-30 02:56 p.m.
Of exporting the transcript
ryanWhen did you start the process
Toby 2025-03-30 02:56 p.m.
Like 3 days ago I think
TobyLike 3 days ago I think
ryan 2025-03-30 02:56 p.m.
So 3 days after the discovery deadline?
ryan 2025-03-30 02:56 p.m.
Yea I don't think so
ryan 2025-03-30 02:56 p.m.
If you had communicated and started at or near the deadline we'd be fine
ryan 2025-03-30 02:57 p.m.
But the first im hearing about the transcript export is yesterday, six days acter
spedvictor 2025-04-02 04:36 p.m.
transcript export of doom
spedvictor 2025-04-02 04:37 p.m.
going to be retired with a 401k by the time it exports
spedvictorgoing to be retired with a 401k by the time it exports
Evexom 2025-04-02 04:44 p.m.
Not like I can provide it even if I wanted now
ryan 2025-04-03 01:39 p.m.
Okay
ryan 2025-04-03 01:39 p.m.@Evexom @huddy.
ryan 2025-04-03 01:39 p.m.
Let's do a pre trial conference sometime
ryan 2025-04-03 01:39 p.m.
When are we available
ryanLet's do a pre trial conference sometime
huddy. 2025-04-03 01:44 p.m.
Uh
huddy. 2025-04-03 01:44 p.m.
Y
ryan 2025-04-03 01:50 p.m.
Pre-trial is over
ryan 2025-04-03 01:50 p.m.
ANd I want to make sure we're ready for trial in one fell swoop
huddy. 2025-04-03 02:03 p.m.
Alright
huddy.Alright
ryan 2025-04-03 02:20 p.m.
I apologize that your 1,000 civil cases that flood our system do not have my priority over school or other cases
ryan 2025-04-03 02:21 p.m.
You need to comprehend that judges have lives. I am enrolled in a significant course load and I am aptly balancing everything. That, however, means JamesMHamilton will not get very speedy results sometimes, and he'll have to accept that.
UserMessage could not be loaded.
ryan 2025-04-03 02:28 p.m.
ryan 2025-04-03 02:28 p.m.
oopsie
ryanI apologize that your 1,000 civil cases that flood our system do not have my priority over school or other cases
Toby 2025-04-03 06:15 p.m.
LOL
ryanWhen are we available
spedvictor 2025-04-03 07:32 p.m.
Do I need to be there for it
spedvictorDo I need to be there for it
ryan 2025-04-03 07:32 p.m.
No just ur attorney
ryanryan 2025-04-03 07:33 p.m.@Evexom
ryan 2025-04-03 07:33 p.m.
rn.
Evexom 2025-04-03 07:33 p.m.
what
Evexom 2025-04-03 07:33 p.m.
why am i getting yelled at
Evexom 2025-04-03 07:33 p.m.
I'm producing drugs rn
ryan 2025-04-03 07:34 p.m.
When r u avaliable
ryan 2025-04-03 07:34 p.m.
for a pre-trial conference
Evexom 2025-04-03 07:35 p.m.
Next week, monday-wednesday
ryan 2025-04-06 12:15 p.m.@huddy. ^^
ryanhuddy. 2025-04-06 12:26 p.m.
Every day bro
huddy. 2025-04-06 12:26 p.m.
Your Honor*
Toby 2025-04-06 06:33 p.m.
Unemployed activities
TobyUnemployed activities
Evexom 2025-04-07 02:18 a.m.
Fr
spedvictor 2025-04-07 06:03 p.m.
Please do not use the empl*yed slur
ryan 2025-04-07 10:43 p.m.@Evexom @huddy. wednesday 230 CDT?
ryan 2025-04-07 10:43 p.m.
Shouldn't take longer than 15-20 minutes unless we have a lot to cover
ryanEvexom 2025-04-07 10:44 p.m.
If we do it over discord, I’m headed out of town though
ryan 2025-04-07 10:46 p.m.
Sure
ryan 2025-04-07 10:46 p.m.
works perfectly
ryanhuddy. 2025-04-08 03:58 a.m.
Ok
ryan 2025-04-09 02:44 p.m.@huddy. @Evexom can we start early
ryanEvexom 2025-04-09 02:54 p.m.
Just ping me whenever I’m needed. I won’t always have service though
ryanhuddy. 2025-04-09 03:24 p.m.
I'm on rn
huddy. 2025-04-09 03:24 p.m.
Can we just start now
huddy. 2025-04-09 03:24 p.m.
And people can respond when they can
ryan 2025-04-09 03:25 p.m.
yes
ryan 2025-04-09 03:25 p.m.
okay
ryan 2025-04-09 03:25 p.m.
We are officially on the record.
ryan 2025-04-09 03:25 p.m.
We are here today for a pretrial conference
ryan 2025-04-09 03:25 p.m.
Parties please state appearences @huddy. @Evexom
huddy. 2025-04-09 03:26 p.m.
JamesMHamilton is present, acting as counsel for Plaintiff.
huddy. 2025-04-09 03:26 p.m.
in the above matter
Evexom 2025-04-09 03:27 p.m.
Fliply27 for the defendant
ryan 2025-04-09 03:27 p.m.
Okay
ryan 2025-04-09 03:27 p.m.@Evexom @huddy. Are there any unresolved matters from pretrial
ryanhuddy. 2025-04-09 03:29 p.m.
Not from our end
ryanEvexom 2025-04-09 07:06 p.m.
Sorry for the delay, I think we are good
ryan 2025-04-09 07:12 p.m.
Okay
ryan 2025-04-09 07:12 p.m.@Evexom @huddy. Any last minute motions
ryanhuddy. 2025-04-10 04:20 a.m.
No
ryan 2025-04-12 02:29 p.m.@Evexom @huddy. Let's get to scheduling
ryan 2025-04-12 02:29 p.m.
What's a date/time we can tentatively start trial
ryanWhat's a date/time we can tentatively start trial
huddy. 2025-04-12 02:30 p.m.
May we do a continous discord trial as we may struggle to find a set time?
ryan 2025-04-12 02:30 p.m.
Oh lord
huddy. 2025-04-12 02:30 p.m.
it will be way quicker and smoother
ryan 2025-04-12 02:30 p.m.
Let attempt to set a time
huddy. 2025-04-12 02:30 p.m.
we could be done within the week
huddy. 2025-04-12 02:30 p.m.
aight
ryan 2025-04-12 02:30 p.m.
Attempt
ryan 2025-04-12 02:30 p.m.
Cause we could knock it out one fell swoop
spedvictor 2025-04-15 01:01 a.m.
SOON
spedvictor 2025-04-15 01:01 a.m.
Do I need to have set availability for this
spedvictor 2025-04-18 02:48 a.m.
huddy. 2025-04-18 10:23 a.m.@ryan ?
huddy. 2025-04-22 11:22 a.m.@ryan ?
spedvictor 2025-04-22 11:37 p.m.
status report.
ryan 2025-04-23 02:08 p.m.@Evexom
ryan 2025-04-23 02:08 p.m.
Care to respond to the channel?
Evexom 2025-04-23 02:09 p.m.
Next tuesday - Thursday works for me
ryan 2025-04-23 02:09 p.m.@spedvictor
huddy. 2025-04-23 02:16 p.m.
Works for us too but would rather start earlier
ryan 2025-04-23 02:16 p.m.
Tenatively, @Evexom @huddy. Can we start Tuesday the 29th, at 3:00 CD
ryan 2025-04-23 02:16 p.m.
CDT
ryanTenatively, @Evexom @huddy. Can we start Tuesday the 29th, at 3:00 CD
huddy. 2025-04-23 02:17 p.m.
May we do an hour earlier?
ryan 2025-04-23 02:17 p.m.
No
ryan 2025-04-23 02:17 p.m.
I have class until 3
ryanTenatively, @Evexom @huddy. Can we start Tuesday the 29th, at 3:00 CD
Evexom 2025-04-23 02:18 p.m.
Should work for me unless something comes up last minute
ryan 2025-04-23 02:18 p.m.
Okay
ryanTenatively, @Evexom @huddy. Can we start Tuesday the 29th, at 3:00 CD
spedvictor 2025-04-23 02:26 p.m.
Ill be in class at this time
ryan 2025-04-23 02:27 p.m.
Thankfully
ryan 2025-04-23 02:27 p.m.
You do NOT need to be there
ryan 2025-04-23 02:27 p.m.
You have a lawyer for a reason
spedvictor 2025-04-23 02:27 p.m.
Ok
spedvictor 2025-04-23 02:28 p.m.
I got pinged for whatever reason so I thought I had to give availability
ryan 2025-04-23 02:28 p.m.
Pinged the wrong brochacho
spedvictor 2025-04-23 02:28 p.m.
spedvictor 2025-04-23 02:30 p.m.
I don’t like need to testify or anything
Evexom 2025-04-23 10:17 p.m.
Just as a notice, I've resigned from Clifford Chance, (Formerly Kingley Napley). Unsure if they'd want to keep me on as counsel in this instance but we will see.
cc@ryan @huddy. @spedvictor (edited)
cc
spedvictor 2025-04-23 10:19 p.m.
If you’re able to, plz find out soon so no more delays
ryan 2025-04-23 11:30 p.m.@Toby
ryanToby 2025-04-25 12:20 p.m.
Erm Hi, so he sort've resigned without notice, so I'm not sure if he wants to stay as counsel for us, but since he's presented staying as counsel as an option, I guess we'll be retaining him for the duration of this matter
ryan 2025-04-25 12:48 p.m.@Evexom hahaha
spedvictor 2025-04-25 02:45 p.m.
the same thing they tried to sanction my previous lawyer for just happened…………. how the turn tables
spedvictorthe same thing they tried to sanction my previous lawyer for just happened…………. how the turn tables
Evexom 2025-04-25 03:37 p.m.
Except it hasnt?
Evexom 2025-04-25 03:38 p.m.
Im still representing my client
ryan 2025-04-25 04:03 p.m.
Lol !
ryan 2025-04-27 11:19 a.m.
Okay guys
ryanTenatively, @Evexom @huddy. Can we start Tuesday the 29th, at 3:00 CD
ryan 2025-04-27 11:20 a.m.
Trial is set for 4/29 300 CDT
ryanTrial is set for 4/29 300 CDT
huddy. 2025-04-29 02:07 p.m.
not possible to move this forward an hour to 2pm cdt?
huddy. 2025-04-29 02:07 p.m.
nvm i already asked and no is the answer
Evexom 2025-04-29 03:12 p.m.
Doing this over discord or in game? @ryan
ryan 2025-04-29 03:12 p.m.
Discord fs
Evexom 2025-04-29 03:12 p.m.
Alright
Evexom 2025-04-29 03:13 p.m.
Yall hating in game trials smh
huddy. 2025-04-29 03:15 p.m.
in game trials are too risky to coach witnesses and carry out highly fraudulent behaviour without being caught
Evexom 2025-04-29 03:15 p.m.
Id say its actually the opposite
Evexom 2025-04-29 03:16 p.m.
In game trial you're kinda needed to respond fast, over discord it can take forever
Evexom 2025-04-29 04:03 p.m.@ryan
Evexom 2025-04-29 04:12 p.m.@ryan
Evexom 2025-04-29 04:29 p.m.@ryan
Evexom 2025-04-29 04:29 p.m.
Hey
Evexom 2025-04-29 04:29 p.m.
PAL
Evexom 2025-04-29 04:29 p.m.
Wake the frick up
Evexom 2025-04-29 04:49 p.m.@ryan
spedvictor 2025-04-29 04:53 p.m.
Contacting the Coroners Office to confirm Time of Death 
spedvictorContacting the Coroners Office to confirm Time of Death
Evexom 2025-04-29 04:53 p.m.
God bless
Evexom 2025-04-29 04:57 p.m.@ryan DO WE NEED TO CONDUCT A WELFARE CHECK?
Toby 2025-04-29 04:59 p.m.
Chat is he dead
Toby 2025-04-29 05:00 p.m.@Brenda please conduct a welfare check on the honorable judge
Toby 2025-04-29 05:00 p.m.
He has gone MIA(edited)
Evexom 2025-04-29 05:00 p.m.
Probably got shot in chicago
Toby 2025-04-29 05:00 p.m.
Serves him right for being in Chicago
Evexom 2025-04-29 05:02 p.m.
Im going back to blackjack, ping me when hes alive
ryan 2025-04-30 02:06 a.m.
i m not in chicago
ryan 2025-04-30 02:06 a.m.
yea i dropped the ball on this one my b guys
spedvictor 2025-04-30 02:07 a.m.
When are you available to reschedule
ryan 2025-04-30 02:08 a.m.
basically anytime now
ryan 2025-04-30 02:09 a.m.
I lwokey logge dout of discord to write an essay and forgot this was happening
ryanyea i dropped the ball on this one my b guys
Evexom 2025-04-30 03:57 a.m.
huddy. 2025-04-30 11:45 a.m.
Discord continuous?
Toby 2025-04-30 12:40 p.m.
I don't object
Evexom 2025-04-30 02:22 p.m.
I still think in game will let this be done faster,
Evexom 2025-04-30 02:22 p.m.
This case has been going on for a while
ryan 2025-04-30 02:26 p.m.
How do yall feel about a magistrate
ryan 2025-04-30 02:26 p.m.@Evexom @huddy.
ryanHow do yall feel about a magistrate
Evexom 2025-04-30 03:08 p.m.
I thought they could only preside over pre trial matters?
Evexom 2025-04-30 03:09 p.m.
If they can handle trial though I have no objections
huddy. 2025-04-30 03:27 p.m.
Neither do I
huddy. 2025-04-30 03:27 p.m.
But a discord trial would be a lot better as it would massively speed things up
huddy. 2025-04-30 03:27 p.m.
Considering that we all have real lives where things pop up all the time
ryan 2025-04-30 03:38 p.m.
Sure
ryan 2025-04-30 03:38 p.m.@Evexom @huddy. Can we start immediately
Evexom 2025-04-30 03:39 p.m.
Id prefer in game, but if we must do discord we can
ryan 2025-04-30 03:39 p.m.
You've made your preferences known
ryan 2025-04-30 03:39 p.m.
Sorry !
Evexom 2025-04-30 03:39 p.m.
!!
ryan 2025-04-30 03:39 p.m.
That's not an answer to the question
ryan 2025-04-30 03:39 p.m.
W1 | Non compliance.
Evexom 2025-04-30 03:39 p.m.
"we can"
Evexom 2025-04-30 03:39 p.m.
doofus
ryan 2025-04-30 03:40 p.m.
W2 | Insulting Your Excellency
Evexom 2025-04-30 03:40 p.m.
EXCELLENCY?
Evexom 2025-04-30 03:40 p.m.
Ok
ryan 2025-04-30 03:40 p.m.
?warn @Evexom
ryan 2025-04-30 03:40 p.m.
Rats.
Evexom 2025-04-30 03:41 p.m.
Apparently the FIFA President is supposed to be called Your Excellency, are you the FIFA President? @ryan
ryan 2025-04-30 03:41 p.m.
Correct.
Evexom 2025-04-30 03:41 p.m.
Interesting
huddy. 2025-04-30 03:44 p.m.
I can start now
ryan 2025-04-30 03:44 p.m.
Okay
ryan 2025-04-30 03:45 p.m.
Actually wait
huddy. 2025-04-30 03:45 p.m.
JamesMHamilton present as counsel for Plaintiff
ryan 2025-04-30 03:45 p.m.
going MIA
ryan 2025-04-30 03:45 p.m.
PEACE!
Evexom 2025-04-30 03:45 p.m.
Im currently gambling and playing American Truck Sim, we should start later today
ryan 2025-04-30 03:45 p.m.
I have class at 6
ryan 2025-04-30 03:45 p.m.
So unless it's before six
ryan 2025-04-30 03:45 p.m.
or after 9
Evexom 2025-04-30 03:46 p.m.
Lets do after 9
ryan 2025-04-30 03:46 p.m.
Well Mr Hamilton will be asleep
ryan 2025-04-30 03:46 p.m.
So no
ryan 2025-04-30 03:47 p.m.
We are on the record
ryan 2025-04-30 03:48 p.m.
Court is called to order. Before it is KingVictor1000 v. Kingley Napely , CV-0112-25 (2025).
ryan 2025-04-30 03:48 p.m.
Please state appearences @Evexom @huddy.
Evexom 2025-04-30 03:48 p.m.
Fliply27 for the Defendant
huddy. 2025-04-30 03:49 p.m.
JamesMhamilton for the Plaintiff
ryan 2025-04-30 03:50 p.m.
Okay
ryan 2025-04-30 03:50 p.m.@huddy. You are to make an opening statement.
huddy. 2025-04-30 04:00 p.m.
Your Honor, this is a very simple case involving a significant breach of a legal services agreement by Defendant, Kingley Napely, resulting in irreperable financial harm to Plaintiff. My client retained Kingley Napely with a $50,000 payment following clear, documented discussions regarding the scope of work required for his business, Columbia Fighting Championship. The services included fighter agreements, liability waivers, and employment-related documents; all of which were acknowledged in writing by and written by Kingley Napley themselves.
Despite entering into this agreement in good faith, my client received only a single contract draft, delivered nearly three weeks later, and when he promptly requested revisions, he was ignored. Over the following month, multiple attempts to follow up were met with either no response or completely vague reassurances backed up by absolutely no action. Nothing was delivered to him until the contract expired.
Because of this failure to perform the work agreed upon, my client lost vital business opportunities and suffered financial damages estimated between $650,000 and $1,150,000.
We will show that Kingley Napely accepted payment, wrote their obligations, acknowledged their obligations, and then abandoned those obligations entirely.
@ryan @Evexom [sorry for taking so long]
Despite entering into this agreement in good faith, my client received only a single contract draft, delivered nearly three weeks later, and when he promptly requested revisions, he was ignored. Over the following month, multiple attempts to follow up were met with either no response or completely vague reassurances backed up by absolutely no action. Nothing was delivered to him until the contract expired.
Because of this failure to perform the work agreed upon, my client lost vital business opportunities and suffered financial damages estimated between $650,000 and $1,150,000.
We will show that Kingley Napely accepted payment, wrote their obligations, acknowledged their obligations, and then abandoned those obligations entirely.
ryan 2025-04-30 04:21 p.m.
Okay
ryan 2025-04-30 04:21 p.m.@Evexom
Evexom 2025-04-30 04:54 p.m.
We waive our opening @ryan
Evexom 2025-04-30 04:54 p.m.
Sorry for the delay
ryan 2025-04-30 04:54 p.m.
Okay
ryan 2025-04-30 04:54 p.m.@huddy. may start evidence presetnation
Evexom 2025-04-30 06:34 p.m.@ryan Can we get a time limit?
ryan 2025-04-30 07:08 p.m.
24 hrs
Evexom 2025-04-30 07:25 p.m.
Thank you
Evexom 2025-05-01 05:15 p.m.@ryan I'm assuming the Plaintiff has waived their presentation of evidence.
Toby 2025-05-01 06:20 p.m.
Seems like they have
ryanspedvictor 2025-05-01 08:01 p.m.
If my lawyers MIA would I be allowed to present or no
huddy.Considering that we all have real lives where things pop up all the time
spedvictor 2025-05-01 08:06 p.m.
Not too sure what’s happened to my lawyer but he is probably not intentionally being unresponsive or waiving his rights or whatever. He did say “we all have real lives where things pop up all the time” so it could probably be inferred that something has happened to him unexpectedly
spedvictorNot too sure what’s happened to my lawyer but he is probably not intentionally being unresponsive or waiving his rights or whatever. He did say “we all have real lives where things...
Evexom 2025-05-01 08:21 p.m.
He was active all morning where he could've asked a single question, yet he didn't.
ryan 2025-05-01 08:46 p.m.
If he doesn't respond by EOD we'll go from there
ryan 2025-05-01 08:46 p.m.@Evexom @Toby
Evexom 2025-05-01 08:46 p.m.
Toby 2025-05-01 08:46 p.m.
K
spedvictorIf my lawyers MIA would I be allowed to present or no
ryan 2025-05-01 08:48 p.m.
This would be possible, but ill advised
ryanThis would be possible, but ill advised
spedvictor 2025-05-01 08:48 p.m.
Well I mean if my lawyer doesn't I don't see any other options
ryan 2025-05-01 08:49 p.m.
You may elect to do so at any time
ryan 2025-05-01 08:49 p.m.
But I will not allow this switching to occur much more
spedvictor 2025-05-01 08:50 p.m.
I'll probably wait a while longer to see if my laywer does get online
ryan 2025-05-01 08:51 p.m.
You have until the end of day CDT to make this to happen or both of you will waive presentation.
ryanYou have until the end of day CDT to make this to happen or both of you will waive presentation.
spedvictor 2025-05-01 08:55 p.m.
For presentation would I just be presenting items from discovery and explaining why they back up the opening statement
ryan 2025-05-01 08:55 p.m.
I am not inclined to help you with matters of procedure
ryan 2025-05-01 08:56 p.m.
If you wish to represent yourself in lieu of counsel, you will be expected to act with the candor and contempetence of a bar certified attorney
ryanIf you wish to represent yourself in lieu of counsel, you will be expected to act with the candor and contempetence of a bar certified attorney
spedvictor 2025-05-01 09:16 p.m.
If I did this, would he still be able to take over for me if he does come back
ryan 2025-05-01 09:17 p.m.
That would be fine, but we won't redo anything
spedvictor 2025-05-02 12:04 a.m.
I will start by deadline if my lawyer is still missing@ryan
ryan 2025-05-02 12:04 a.m.
I would start now, if you don't start by xx:59, it doesn't matter
spedvictor 2025-05-02 12:05 a.m.
Just wrapping up something irl and then I will
spedvictor 2025-05-02 12:50 a.m.
I call tobyrulles4568 to the stand
ryan 2025-05-02 12:51 a.m.
Kay
ryan 2025-05-02 12:51 a.m.@Toby
spedvictor 2025-05-02 12:53 a.m.
Please note that I need to wake up for school in about 9 hours from now
ryan 2025-05-02 12:53 a.m.
You're fine
ryan 2025-05-02 12:53 a.m.
Just try and ensure everything is <24 hours from each other
Evexom 2025-05-02 12:54 a.m.
I believe it's around 5am for my client, I don't believe we will get a response for a few hours.
ryanJust try and ensure everything is <24 hours from each other
spedvictor 2025-05-02 12:57 a.m.
Alright, I should be able to respond to each message within that time
ryanToby 2025-05-02 04:59 a.m.
Hello
Toby 2025-05-02 04:59 a.m.
Non religious
huddy. 2025-05-02 03:05 p.m.@spedvictor Apologies for confusion with my client, considering that Toby has not been sworn in yet, we choose another line of questioning instead, calling Plaintiff Kingvictor1000 to the stand.
huddy. 2025-05-02 03:06 p.m.@ryan *^^
Toby 2025-05-02 04:54 p.m.
This is kinda outrageous, I'm not gonna lie
Toby 2025-05-02 05:22 p.m.
Even if counsel for the Plaintiff is somehow allowed to continue like this, we heavily motion for this court to impose sanctions for the conduct of the Plaintiff's counsel
huddy.ryan 2025-05-02 07:16 p.m.
No
ryan 2025-05-02 07:16 p.m.@Toby
ryan 2025-05-02 07:17 p.m.
Do you swear to tell the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth under the pains and penalties of prejury
ryanDo you swear to tell the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth under the pains and penalties of prejury
Toby 2025-05-02 07:34 p.m.
I do
Toby 2025-05-02 07:34 p.m.
Though note it's near 1 AM so I'm going to sleep soon
ryan 2025-05-02 07:34 p.m.
That
ryan 2025-05-02 07:34 p.m.
's fine
ryan 2025-05-02 07:34 p.m.
I'll be joining you.
Toby 2025-05-02 07:34 p.m.
ryan 2025-05-02 07:34 p.m.@huddy. @spedvictor Your witness
Tobyryan 2025-05-02 07:34 p.m.
Not in the case !!!
Toby 2025-05-02 08:00 p.m.
Ok going to sleep now
huddy. 2025-05-03 04:07 a.m.@Toby When were you first approached by Kingvictor1000?
huddy.Toby 2025-05-03 05:33 a.m.
I dont know
huddy. 2025-05-03 05:35 a.m.@Toby Do you oversee the management of all cases handled by your firm?
huddy.Toby 2025-05-03 05:36 a.m.
Not typically, that's down to the other partners themselves
huddy. 2025-05-03 05:37 a.m.@Toby Do you have access to all cases handled by your firm?
huddy.Toby 2025-05-03 05:50 a.m.
Yes
huddy. 2025-05-03 05:52 a.m.@Toby In the time period between November 29th 2025 and February 12th 2025, what was your position in Kingley Napley?
huddy.Toby 2025-05-03 05:52 a.m.
Managing Partner
huddy. 2025-05-03 05:54 a.m.@Toby Would I be correct in confirming that the position of Managing Partner entails full management/control over the activities and operations of your firm?
huddy.Toby 2025-05-03 05:54 a.m.
Objection leading @ryan
huddy. 2025-05-03 05:55 a.m.
Withdrawn, no point - @Toby Tell me more about the functions of your role as Managing Partner.
huddy.Withdrawn, no point - @Toby Tell me more about the functions of your role as Managing Partner.
Toby 2025-05-03 05:57 a.m.
I oversee the partners, the hiring process and the management of the discord server itself, and i also give advice to associates who ask for it
TobyI oversee the partners, the hiring process and the management of the discord server itself, and i also give advice to associates who ask for it
huddy. 2025-05-03 05:57 a.m.
Do you control the operations of your firm?
huddy.Do you control the operations of your firm?
Toby 2025-05-03 05:59 a.m.
Bit vague, but I control aspects of the firm as mentioned in my previous answer, the rest is overseen by the other partners
TobyBit vague, but I control aspects of the firm as mentioned in my previous answer, the rest is overseen by the other partners
huddy. 2025-05-03 05:59 a.m.
Do your partners report to you?
huddy.Do your partners report to you?
Toby 2025-05-03 05:59 a.m.
They do yes
TobyThey do yes
huddy. 2025-05-03 06:01 a.m.
Could you provide us with a summary of what your firm's purpose is?
huddy.Could you provide us with a summary of what your firm's purpose is?
Toby 2025-05-03 06:01 a.m.
In terms of what
Toby 2025-05-03 06:01 a.m.
Overall ?
TobyOverall ?
huddy. 2025-05-03 06:02 a.m.
The purpose of your firm's operations and activities.
huddy.The purpose of your firm's operations and activities.
Toby 2025-05-03 06:02 a.m.
We provide legal services and advice to those who need it
TobyWe provide legal services and advice to those who need it
huddy. 2025-05-03 06:06 a.m.
And what is the purpose of your ticket function?
huddy.And what is the purpose of your ticket function?
Toby 2025-05-03 06:35 a.m.
For clients to request our services
huddy. 2025-05-03 06:36 a.m.@Toby I am now going to present to you Exhibit B of Plaintiff's Discovery, a recording of the transcript of a ticket opened by Plaintiff in your firm's server.
https://medal.tv/games/requested/clips/jG0DTY0dygXszuj8R?invite=cr-MSxDUm0sMTg1MzQzMzM0LA
Do you recognize the contents of the ticket in this video?18 Views. Watch RIP 50K and millions of other Requested videos captured using Medal. 
https://medal.tv/games/requested/clips/jG0DTY0dygXszuj8R?invite=cr-MSxDUm0sMTg1MzQzMzM0LA
Do you recognize the contents of the ticket in this video?
huddy.Toby 2025-05-03 06:38 a.m.
Yes
TobyYes
huddy. 2025-05-03 06:41 a.m.
Are the contents shown in the video an accurate depiction of the actual transcript?
huddy.Are the contents shown in the video an accurate depiction of the actual transcript?
Toby 2025-05-03 06:42 a.m.
I suppose so
TobyI suppose so
huddy. 2025-05-03 06:43 a.m.
Do you have any reason to believe that the above video has been edited in any way to not depict the actual transcript?
huddy.Do you have any reason to believe that the above video has been edited in any way to not depict the actual transcript?
Toby 2025-05-03 06:44 a.m.
I don't know, I'm not the owner so I can't speak to whether or not it's editited
TobyI don't know, I'm not the owner so I can't speak to whether or not it's editited
huddy. 2025-05-03 06:45 a.m.
Do you currently have access to the channel in your discord server which holds that ticket?
huddy. 2025-05-03 06:45 a.m.
Entitled: KingVictor1000-retained-channel!
huddy.Do you currently have access to the channel in your discord server which holds that ticket?
Toby 2025-05-03 06:46 a.m.
No
Toby 2025-05-03 06:46 a.m.
The old transcript bot got deleted
Toby 2025-05-03 06:46 a.m.
Because it shutdown
Toby 2025-05-03 06:46 a.m.
And as such the actual ticket transcript isn't able to be recovered
huddy. 2025-05-03 06:46 a.m.
Oh interesting
Toby 2025-05-03 06:47 a.m.
Remember we had issued at the beginning of the case
huddy. 2025-05-03 06:47 a.m.@ryan We move to bring Exhibit B into evidence to be discussed during trial.
Evexom 2025-05-03 11:06 a.m.@ryan We move to strike the entire line of questioning for lack of foundation
huddy. 2025-05-03 11:52 a.m.
Your Honor without presenting the exhibit, we are unable to establish any foundation
huddy. 2025-05-03 11:52 a.m.
allow us some more questions
huddy. 2025-05-03 11:52 a.m.
You can’t strike an entire line because I didn’t ask the fellow what his name was
huddy.You can’t strike an entire line because I didn’t ask the fellow what his name was
Evexom 2025-05-03 02:00 p.m.
Er. I quite literally can?
Evexom 2025-05-03 02:00 p.m.
Plus that’s not the only thing, you haven’t established any foundation at all
huddy. 2025-05-03 02:01 p.m.
a. I didn't choose to start with Toby
b. We are getting to it, I need the evidence presented first
b. We are getting to it, I need the evidence presented first
Evexom 2025-05-03 02:03 p.m.
You don’t need evidence to establish foundation?
Evexom 2025-05-03 02:03 p.m.
And it doesn’t matter who you start with
Evexom 2025-05-03 02:03 p.m.
You need foundation before you start asking questions related to the case
Evexom 2025-05-03 02:03 p.m.
Foundation you haven’t established
huddy. 2025-05-03 02:19 p.m.
Once again, we are getting to it, we request that you allow Your Honor some more
Toby 2025-05-03 02:54 p.m.
you can't establish the foundation after an entire line of questioning
huddy. 2025-05-03 03:23 p.m.
An entire line of questioning? I've asked you 14 questions. 1 of which was not adequately answered, 9 of which were to build foundation by questioning your management of your firm, and 4 of which relate to the evidence presented, building foundation on that to bring it into evidence.
Evexom 2025-05-03 03:23 p.m.
Let’s wait for @ryan to get back on and rule so we aren’t flooding the channel
ryan 2025-05-03 07:25 p.m.
I leave for ONE DAY
Evexomryan 2025-05-03 10:18 p.m.
Do you object to the evidence
ryan 2025-05-03 10:18 p.m.
Or which questions from when to where
ryanOr which questions from when to where
Evexom 2025-05-03 10:30 p.m.
From his first question until his last
EvexomFrom his first question until his last
ryan 2025-05-03 10:34 p.m.
Oh the ENTIRE
Evexom 2025-05-03 10:34 p.m.
Yes
Evexom 2025-05-03 10:34 p.m.
All of it
ryan 2025-05-03 10:34 p.m.
Evexom 2025-05-03 10:34 p.m.
<3
ryan 2025-05-03 10:35 p.m.
Im ending it
Evexom 2025-05-03 10:35 p.m.
I could put in an objection for each individual one if you want
ryan 2025-05-03 10:35 p.m.
I would love you
Evexom 2025-05-03 10:36 p.m.
God bless I’ll do it once I’m off work
huddy.Evexom 2025-05-04 01:39 a.m.
Objection - Lack of Foundation - It was never established that the witness was approached by the Plaintiff
huddy.Evexom 2025-05-04 01:39 a.m.
Objection - Lack of Foundation - It was never established that the witness runs a firm
huddy.Evexom 2025-05-04 01:39 a.m.
Objection - Lack of Foundation - It was never established that the witness runs a firm
huddy.Evexom 2025-05-04 01:39 a.m.
Objection - Lack of Foundation - It was never established that the witness worked at Kingley Napley
huddy.Evexom 2025-05-04 01:39 a.m.
Obection - Leading
huddy.Withdrawn, no point - @Toby Tell me more about the functions of your role as Managing Partner.
Evexom 2025-05-04 01:39 a.m.
Objection - Asks for Narrative
EvexomObjection - Asks for Narrative
Evexom 2025-05-04 01:40 a.m.
+ Lack of Foundation - It was never established the witness was Managing Partner
huddy.Do you control the operations of your firm?
Evexom 2025-05-04 01:40 a.m.
Objection - Lack of Foundation - It was never established that the witness runs a firm
huddy.Do your partners report to you?
Evexom 2025-05-04 01:40 a.m.
Objection - Irrelevant
huddy.Could you provide us with a summary of what your firm's purpose is?
Evexom 2025-05-04 01:40 a.m.
Objection - Irrelevant
huddy.And what is the purpose of your ticket function?
Evexom 2025-05-04 01:40 a.m.
Objection - Irrelevant
huddy.Evexom 2025-05-04 01:41 a.m.
Objection - Assumes facts not in evidence - It was never established that the Plaintiff opened a ticket in the firm's server
huddy.Evexom 2025-05-04 01:41 a.m.
Objection - Lack of Foundation (To the evidence)
Evexom 2025-05-04 01:41 a.m.
cc @ryan
ryan 2025-05-04 01:41 a.m.
Hai
Evexom 2025-05-04 01:41 a.m.
There are my objections
Evexom 2025-05-04 01:41 a.m.
<3
huddy.Evexom 2025-05-04 01:41 a.m.
Objection - Lack of Foundation
EvexomObjection - Lack of Foundation - It was never established that the witness was approached by the Plaintiff
ryan 2025-05-04 11:53 p.m.
Overruled
EvexomObjection - Lack of Foundation - It was never established that the witness runs a firm
ryan 2025-05-04 11:53 p.m.
Sustained
EvexomObjection - Lack of Foundation - It was never established that the witness runs a firm
ryan 2025-05-04 11:54 p.m.
Sustained
EvexomObjection - Lack of Foundation - It was never established that the witness worked at Kingley Napley
ryan 2025-05-04 11:54 p.m.
Sustained
EvexomObection - Leading
ryan 2025-05-04 11:54 p.m.
Sustained
EvexomObjection - Asks for Narrative
ryan 2025-05-04 11:54 p.m.
Overruled
Evexom+ Lack of Foundation - It was never established the witness was Managing Partner
ryan 2025-05-04 11:54 p.m.
Sustained
EvexomObjection - Irrelevant
ryan 2025-05-04 11:54 p.m.
Overruled
EvexomObjection - Irrelevant
ryan 2025-05-04 11:55 p.m.
Overruled
EvexomObjection - Assumes facts not in evidence - It was never established that the Plaintiff opened a ticket in the firm's server
ryan 2025-05-04 11:55 p.m.
Sustained
ryan 2025-05-04 11:55 p.m.@huddy.
ryanOverruled
Evexom 2025-05-04 11:55 p.m.
I believe no other partner was within the ticket, its irrelevant
ryan 2025-05-04 11:56 p.m.
Okay overruled
ryanOverruled
Evexom 2025-05-04 11:56 p.m.
Reason? Please?
ryan 2025-05-04 11:56 p.m.
Because it would tend to make one or more facts probable/lay foundation for further questions
huddy.Do your partners report to you?
Evexom 2025-05-04 11:57 p.m.
Lack of foundation, never established the witnesses has Partners
ryan 2025-05-04 11:58 p.m.
There we go
ryan 2025-05-04 11:58 p.m.
Sustained
huddy.Could you provide us with a summary of what your firm's purpose is?
Evexom 2025-05-04 11:58 p.m.
Lack of foundation, never established the witness runs a firm
huddy.Withdrawn, no point - @Toby Tell me more about the functions of your role as Managing Partner.
Evexom 2025-05-04 11:58 p.m.
Lack of foundation, never established the witness is a Managing Partner
ryan 2025-05-04 11:58 p.m.
Sustained
EvexomLack of foundation, never established the witness is a Managing Partner
ryan 2025-05-04 11:58 p.m.
Incorrect
ryan 2025-05-04 11:59 p.m.
Overruled
huddy.Evexom 2025-05-04 11:59 p.m.
Lack of foundation, we don't know who the witness is
EvexomLack of foundation, we don't know who the witness is
ryan 2025-05-04 11:59 p.m.
Incorrect, overruled
ryan 2025-05-04 11:59 p.m.
You're going too far here
huddy.ryan 2025-05-04 11:59 p.m.
ryan 2025-05-04 11:59 p.m.
Stating your name is for the record so we know exactly who is testifying
ryan 2025-05-04 11:59 p.m.
You're being overly pedantic
ryanOverruled
Evexom 2025-05-05 12:00 a.m.
Evexom 2025-05-05 12:00 a.m.
It was struck
Evexom 2025-05-05 12:00 a.m.
Please amend your ruling !
Evexom 2025-05-05 12:00 a.m.
<3
ryanSustained
ryan 2025-05-05 12:00 a.m.
This is overruled then
Evexom 2025-05-05 12:01 a.m.
grabbed the wrong link, https://discord.com/channels/1274202187911790632/1346251775551996056/1368797907376930909
Evexom 2025-05-05 12:01 a.m.
sorry sorry !
ryan 2025-05-05 12:02 a.m.
So you're objecting to that
ryan 2025-05-05 12:02 a.m.
Based on the fact that opposing counsel didn't explicitly ask whether he worked there?
ryan 2025-05-05 12:02 a.m.
Yea no
Evexom 2025-05-05 12:02 a.m.
gimme a minute I'm lost
ryanSustained
ryan 2025-05-05 12:02 a.m.
Overruled
Evexom 2025-05-05 12:02 a.m.
one moment please !
ryan 2025-05-05 12:02 a.m.
Thanks for pointing that out !
Evexom 2025-05-05 12:02 a.m.
???
ryan 2025-05-05 12:03 a.m.
What are you confused on
Evexom 2025-05-05 12:03 a.m.
Gimme a min
Evexom 2025-05-05 12:08 a.m.
Is this all correct?
When were you first approached by Kingvicto1000 - Remains
Do you oversee the management of all cases handle by your firm - Struck
Do you have access to all cases handled by your firm - Struck
In the time period between November 29th 2025 and February 12th 2025, what was your position at Kingley Napley - ???
Would I be correct in confirming that the position of Managing Partner entails full management/control over the activities and operations of your firm - Struck
Tell me more about the functionf of your role as Managing Partner - Remains on Narrative, Struck on Lack of Foundation (???)
Do your Partners report to you - Remains
Can you provide us with a summary of what your firm's purpose is - Remains on relevence, Struck on Lack of Foundation
Exhibit B message - StruckEvexom 2025-05-05 12:08 a.m.@ryan
Evexom 2025-05-05 12:08 a.m.
If not which ones are wrong
ryan 2025-05-05 12:08 a.m.
oh god
ryan 2025-05-05 12:08 a.m.
he gave us a table
Evexom 2025-05-05 12:09 a.m.
Im autistic, sorry
ryan 2025-05-05 12:09 a.m.
i am too
ryan 2025-05-05 12:09 a.m.
buddy
ryan 2025-05-05 12:09 a.m.
"In the time period between November 29th 2025 and February 12th 2025, what was your position at Kingley Napley - ???" -> Remains
ryan 2025-05-05 12:09 a.m.
"Tell me more about the functionf of your role as Managing Partner - Remains on Narrative, Struck on Lack of Foundation (???)" -> Remains
Evexom 2025-05-05 12:10 a.m.
Is that all that is changed?
Evexom 2025-05-05 12:11 a.m.@ryan ?
ryan 2025-05-05 12:11 a.m.
Affirm
Evexom 2025-05-05 12:11 a.m.
I need a spreadsheet for htis
ryan 2025-05-05 12:11 a.m.
You do NOT need to ping me
Evexom 2025-05-05 12:11 a.m.
Please hold
Evexom 2025-05-05 12:11 a.m.
SORRY
ryan 2025-05-05 12:11 a.m.
I AM TRYING TO LEARN U SUBSTITUTION
Evexom 2025-05-05 12:11 a.m.
IM IMPATIENT
ryan 2025-05-05 12:11 a.m.
I AM GOING TO SUBSTITUTION U BUDDY
Evexom 2025-05-05 12:11 a.m.
???
Evexom 2025-05-05 12:11 a.m.
MATH ??
ryan 2025-05-05 12:11 a.m.
You'll see.
ryan 2025-05-05 12:11 a.m.
Yes I have my calc final tmr
Evexom 2025-05-05 12:11 a.m.
oh god
Evexom 2025-05-05 12:11 a.m.
That reminds me, I have six days to finish calc 1
Evexom 2025-05-05 12:11 a.m.
Evexom 2025-05-05 12:12 a.m.
Kill me now
ryan 2025-05-05 12:13 a.m.
calc 1 lightwork no reaction
Evexom 2025-05-05 12:15 a.m.
ok
Evexom 2025-05-05 12:15 a.m.
so
Evexom 2025-05-05 12:15 a.m.
one moment
Evexom 2025-05-05 12:15 a.m.
I want to argue so give me one minute
ryanOverruled
Evexom 2025-05-05 12:18 a.m.
WHY
ryan 2025-05-05 12:18 a.m.
We're not arguing.
Evexom 2025-05-05 12:18 a.m.
Im just trying to understand, because you originally sustained it
ryan 2025-05-05 12:19 a.m.
And you pointed out how I fucked up
huddy.ryan 2025-05-05 12:20 a.m.
Because I forgot this existed and you reminded me.
Evexom 2025-05-05 12:20 a.m.
It was never established that he worked at Kingley Napley
Evexom 2025-05-05 12:20 a.m.
Are we going off the same reason at for the first ruling?
Evexom 2025-05-05 12:20 a.m.
If so I have no problems with it
huddy.Evexom 2025-05-05 12:22 a.m.
Objection, assumes facts not in evidence. It was never established that the Witness has worked at Kingley Napley
EvexomObjection, assumes facts not in evidence. It was never established that the Witness has worked at Kingley Napley
ryan 2025-05-05 12:57 a.m.
Dude
ryan 2025-05-05 12:57 a.m.
We've been over this
ryan 2025-05-05 12:57 a.m.
overruled
Evexom 2025-05-05 12:58 a.m.
ok
ryan 2025-05-06 11:35 a.m.@huddy. You're about to waive this witness
huddy. 2025-05-06 11:50 a.m.@Toby Are you the owner of the business registered as Kingley Napley?
huddy.Toby 2025-05-06 11:54 a.m.
I'm the managing partner
TobyI'm the managing partner
huddy. 2025-05-06 11:56 a.m.
Do you have a ticket function in your server??
huddy. 2025-05-06 11:57 a.m.
Apologies for double question marks.
huddy.Apologies for double question marks.
ryan 2025-05-06 12:19 p.m.
Very inquisitive
huddy.Do you have a ticket function in your server??
Toby 2025-05-06 12:25 p.m.
Define what a ticket system is
TobyDefine what a ticket system is
huddy. 2025-05-06 12:29 p.m.
Excuse me? You either do have a function in your server for somebody to open a ticket, or you don't.
huddy.Excuse me? You either do have a function in your server for somebody to open a ticket, or you don't.
Toby 2025-05-06 12:46 p.m.
You're excused. Can you please define what you mean by ticket function? Are you asking if we hand out tickets to shows? Cause if so, it would be a no unfortunately
huddy. 2025-05-06 12:49 p.m.
OMG I wish I could be as hard and sigma as cool as you - you must get all the ladies!
huddy. 2025-05-06 12:49 p.m.
oop hotmic
TobyYou're excused. Can you please define what you mean by ticket function? Are you asking if we hand out tickets to shows? Cause if so, it would be a no unfortunately
huddy. 2025-05-06 12:50 p.m.
How do people employ your firm?
huddy.OMG I wish I could be as hard and sigma as cool as you - you must get all the ladies!
Toby 2025-05-06 12:56 p.m.@ryan objection argumentative
Toby 2025-05-06 12:56 p.m.
And badgering
huddy.How do people employ your firm?
Toby 2025-05-06 12:56 p.m.
They request employment, and we determine if they meet our criteria and needs
TobyThey request employment, and we determine if they meet our criteria and needs
huddy. 2025-05-06 12:58 p.m.
And through what medium do they request your employment?
huddy.And through what medium do they request your employment?
Toby 2025-05-06 01:00 p.m.
If someone wants our services they contact the firm and tell us what they need, and we'll then decide if their case is worth taking(edited)
TobyIf someone wants our services they contact the firm and tell us what they need, and we'll then decide if their case is worth taking(edited)
huddy. 2025-05-06 01:00 p.m.
I'm going to ask you again since you clearly have not understood - through what medium do they request your employment?
huddy.I'm going to ask you again since you clearly have not understood - through what medium do they request your employment?
Toby 2025-05-06 01:00 p.m.
What does medium mean (I'm being fr)
huddy. 2025-05-06 01:01 p.m.
huddy.Toby 2025-05-06 01:01 p.m.
Objection argumentative
huddy. 2025-05-06 01:01 p.m.
If you're being fr, medium = DMs, sound waves, discord tickets, ultraviolet light
Toby 2025-05-06 01:02 p.m.
We communicate via ultraviolet light
huddy. 2025-05-06 01:04 p.m.
Your Honor @ryan
huddy. 2025-05-06 01:04 p.m.
my blood is boiling
huddy. 2025-05-06 01:04 p.m.
I lied, I can be easily ragebaited
huddy. 2025-05-06 01:04 p.m.
please instruct the witness to answer my questions seriously
huddy. 2025-05-06 01:04 p.m.
as we are in a super serious situation, the robloxian court of law
huddy.please instruct the witness to answer my questions seriously
Toby 2025-05-06 01:04 p.m.
I am!
Toby 2025-05-06 01:05 p.m.
You asked how do they request my firms employment
Toby 2025-05-06 01:05 p.m.
And I was going to say, via dms
Toby 2025-05-06 01:05 p.m.
Usually
TobyUsually
huddy. 2025-05-06 01:05 p.m.
In the firm's server, do you have a ticket-open function for individuals to request your employment through a private channel?
huddy.In the firm's server, do you have a ticket-open function for individuals to request your employment through a private channel?
Toby 2025-05-06 01:06 p.m.
Are you referring to the bot?
huddy. 2025-05-06 01:06 p.m.
Chat
TobyAre you referring to the bot?
huddy. 2025-05-06 01:07 p.m.
Am I referring to the bot? No, I'm referring to a ticket-open function for individuals to request your employment through a private channel. Do you or do you not have such an operational feature in the Kingley Napley discord server??
huddy.Am I referring to the bot? No, I'm referring to a ticket-open function for individuals to request your employment through a private channel. Do you or do you not have such an opera...
Toby 2025-05-06 01:08 p.m.
I'm not aware of any discord only feature within my server that doesn't require a bot
huddy. 2025-05-06 01:08 p.m.
Did I ask you whether or not you had a ticket-open function for individuals to request your employment through a private channel, that doesn't require a bot?
huddy. 2025-05-06 01:09 p.m.
No, I asked you whether or not you had a ticket-open function for individuals to request your employment through a private channel.
huddy.Did I ask you whether or not you had a ticket-open function for individuals to request your employment through a private channel, that doesn't require a bot?
Toby 2025-05-06 01:09 p.m.
You said no, when I asked if you were referring to the bot
huddy. 2025-05-06 01:09 p.m.
I will allow you one more opportunity to answer my question fella
TobyYou said no, when I asked if you were referring to the bot
huddy. 2025-05-06 01:09 p.m.
I am not referring to a bot? I am referring to a ticket-open function for individuals to request your employment through a private channel... This might include a bot...?
huddy. 2025-05-06 01:09 p.m.
But a ticket-open function for individuals to request your employment through a private channel is not a bot.
huddy.I will allow you one more opportunity to answer my question fella
Toby 2025-05-06 01:09 p.m.
Objection i consider that very threatening
huddy. 2025-05-06 01:09 p.m.
ma'am*
huddy.ma'am*
Toby 2025-05-06 01:09 p.m.
Objection he's gender assuming now
huddy. 2025-05-06 01:10 p.m.
Xa'am*
huddy.But a ticket-open function for individuals to request your employment through a private channel is not a bot.
Toby 2025-05-06 01:10 p.m.
So are you asking me do i have a ticket function in my discord that isn't ran by a bot?
huddy. 2025-05-06 01:11 p.m.
Point me to one place in my question where I stated that the function doesn't have a bot
huddy. 2025-05-06 01:11 p.m.
DO YOU OR DO YOU NOT HAVE A ticket-open function for individuals to request your employment through a private channel?
huddy.No, I asked you whether or not you had a ticket-open function for individuals to request your employment through a private channel.
Toby 2025-05-06 01:11 p.m.
.
huddy. 2025-05-06 01:12 p.m.
Sorry I just control f'd that statement and I can't find the bit where I say that the feature cannot include a bot
huddy.DO YOU OR DO YOU NOT HAVE A ticket-open function for individuals to request your employment through a private channel?
Toby 2025-05-06 01:12 p.m.
Ohhh right, you could've made that more clear earlier on, yes, I believe so
TobyOhhh right, you could've made that more clear earlier on, yes, I believe so
huddy. 2025-05-06 01:13 p.m.
You believe so? Do you, or do you not? Please check now...
huddy.You believe so? Do you, or do you not? Please check now...
Toby 2025-05-06 01:16 p.m.
Are you referring to the ticket system that was ran by the "Ticket bot"
Toby 2025-05-06 01:17 p.m.
If so then I have an answer, I just need clarity
huddy. 2025-05-06 01:17 p.m.
Indeed...
huddy.Indeed...
Toby 2025-05-06 01:17 p.m.
Then no, I do not
TobyThen no, I do not
huddy. 2025-05-06 01:18 p.m.
What do you have?
huddy. 2025-05-06 01:18 p.m.
Let me guess, a ticket system ran by the 'ticket bot' with lowercase letters?
huddy.What do you have?
Toby 2025-05-06 01:18 p.m.
We have a ticket system via the bot "Tickets V2"
huddy. 2025-05-06 01:18 p.m.
Oh wow
huddy.Oh wow
Toby 2025-05-06 01:18 p.m.
Amazing right
huddy. 2025-05-06 01:18 p.m.
Has Plaintiff ever utilized this Tickets V2 function in the Kingley Napley discord server?
huddy.Has Plaintiff ever utilized this Tickets V2 function in the Kingley Napley discord server?
Toby 2025-05-06 01:19 p.m.
No
TobyNo
huddy. 2025-05-06 01:20 p.m.
Has Plaintiff ever utilized any ticket function in the Kingley Napley discord server?
huddy.Has Plaintiff ever utilized any ticket function in the Kingley Napley discord server?
Toby 2025-05-06 01:20 p.m.
I can't remember, we get a lot of clients coming to our firm
TobyI can't remember, we get a lot of clients coming to our firm
huddy. 2025-05-06 01:21 p.m.
Do you have records or archives of tickets?
huddy.Do you have records or archives of tickets?
Toby 2025-05-06 01:21 p.m.
Yes
Toby 2025-05-06 01:22 p.m.
Well
TobyYes
huddy. 2025-05-06 01:22 p.m.
Could you please review those and then answer the question pondering upon whether Plaintiff has ever utilized any ticket function in your server?
huddy.Could you please review those and then answer the question pondering upon whether Plaintiff has ever utilized any ticket function in your server?
Toby 2025-05-06 01:22 p.m.
I already have
Toby 2025-05-06 01:22 p.m.
There is no such record
Toby 2025-05-06 01:22 p.m.
Of a ticket
Toby 2025-05-06 01:22 p.m.
Being opened in our firm
Toby 2025-05-06 01:22 p.m.
By him
Toby 2025-05-06 01:22 p.m.
In our Discord Server
huddy. 2025-05-06 01:22 p.m.
Is that because he used a prior version of the Ticket Bot?
huddy.Is that because he used a prior version of the Ticket Bot?
Toby 2025-05-06 01:22 p.m.
Yes
huddy. 2025-05-06 01:40 p.m.
You have just told me that you can’t remember if Plaintiff ever utilised any ticket function in your server, and now you’re telling me he did?
huddy. 2025-05-06 01:40 p.m.
which one is it?
Toby 2025-05-06 01:52 p.m.
You told me to check
Toby 2025-05-06 01:52 p.m.
So I did
Toby 2025-05-06 01:52 p.m.
If you go to the top of this case channel
Toby 2025-05-06 01:52 p.m.
You'll see that we had issues trying to recover it
huddy.Excuse me? You either do have a function in your server for somebody to open a ticket, or you don't.
Evexom 2025-05-06 02:19 p.m.
Objection, argumentative
huddy.OMG I wish I could be as hard and sigma as cool as you - you must get all the ladies!
Evexom 2025-05-06 02:20 p.m.
Objection, badgering
huddy.as we are in a super serious situation, the robloxian court of law
ryan 2025-05-06 03:02 p.m.
I don't think you're being rage baitef
ryan 2025-05-06 03:02 p.m.
I think you're being outclassed by a superior attorney who's your witness
huddy. 2025-05-06 03:03 p.m.
Yurr very superior to pretend not to know what a ticket is
huddy. 2025-05-06 03:03 p.m.
as i said, I wish I could be more like him
huddy. 2025-05-06 03:03 p.m.
May I continue questioning?
EvexomObjection, argumentative
ryan 2025-05-06 03:04 p.m.
Sustainable
EvexomObjection, badgering
ryan 2025-05-06 03:04 p.m.
Sustained
Evexom 2025-05-06 03:04 p.m.
Thank you
ryan 2025-05-06 03:04 p.m.
Please stop trolling James this is accomplishing nothing beyond making you look like you're getting dicked on
ryan 2025-05-06 03:07 p.m.
Do you have further questions @huddy.
huddy. 2025-05-06 03:08 p.m.@Toby Are you aware of any of the contents discussed in the ticket which Plaintiff utilised with your old system in the Kingley Napley server?
huddy.Toby 2025-05-06 03:31 p.m.
Not off the top of my head
huddy.Evexom 2025-05-06 03:38 p.m.
Objection, vague
@ryan
ryan 2025-05-06 03:39 p.m.
Overruled
Evexom 2025-05-06 03:39 p.m.
huddy. 2025-05-06 03:43 p.m.@Toby I am now going to present to you Exhibit B of Plaintiff's Discovery, a recording of the transcript of a ticket opened by Plaintiff in your firm's server.
https://medal.tv/games/requested/clips/jG0DTY0dygXszuj8R?invite=cr-MSxDUm0sMTg1MzQzMzM0LA
Do you recognize the contents of the ticket in this video?18 Views. Watch RIP 50K and millions of other Requested videos captured using Medal. 
https://medal.tv/games/requested/clips/jG0DTY0dygXszuj8R?invite=cr-MSxDUm0sMTg1MzQzMzM0LA
Do you recognize the contents of the ticket in this video?
huddy.Evexom 2025-05-06 03:48 p.m.
Objection, lack of foundation. The video hasn't been authenticated and has no foundation to establish reliability
Evexom 2025-05-06 03:48 p.m.@ryan
ryan 2025-05-06 03:48 p.m.
James
ryan 2025-05-06 03:48 p.m.
Shur up
ryan 2025-05-06 03:48 p.m.
I got this
huddy. 2025-05-06 03:48 p.m.
Yeah bro lemme just establish reliability before presenting the video
EvexomObjection, lack of foundation. The video hasn't been authenticated and has no foundation to establish reliability
ryan 2025-05-06 03:49 p.m.
Witness testimony authenticates, your objection is valid insofar as it's admitted for evidence
ryan 2025-05-06 03:49 p.m.
But it's not
ryan 2025-05-06 03:49 p.m.
So
ryan 2025-05-06 03:49 p.m.
ryan 2025-05-06 03:49 p.m.
^ objection*
Evexom 2025-05-06 03:49 p.m.
Can we get a formal ruling instead of a gif?
ryan 2025-05-06 03:50 p.m.
This is the ruling.
Evexom 2025-05-06 03:50 p.m.
Overruled or Sustained please
huddy. 2025-05-06 03:50 p.m.
Your Honor, what's a B1TCH?
huddy. 2025-05-06 03:50 p.m.
is that a defense attorney who can't read a gif
huddy. 2025-05-06 03:51 p.m.
or a witness who doesn't know what a ticket is
huddy.Your Honor, what's a B1TCH?
ryan 2025-05-06 03:51 p.m.
A b!tch*
huddy. 2025-05-06 03:51 p.m.
Oh ok thanks
ryan 2025-05-06 03:51 p.m.
Or a lawyer getting dicked on in his own direct?
ryan 2025-05-06 03:51 p.m.
Any of those answers suffice
huddy. 2025-05-06 03:51 p.m.
Your Honor, my pronability to ragebaiting is not a weakness
huddy. 2025-05-06 03:51 p.m.
its a superpower
EvexomOverruled or Sustained please
Evexom 2025-05-06 03:51 p.m.@ryan
ryan 2025-05-06 03:51 p.m.
There
Evexom 2025-05-06 03:51 p.m.
That works ig
ryan 2025-05-06 03:52 p.m.
It better work counselor
ryan 2025-05-06 03:52 p.m.
If this is going continue to be a dick measuring context like it already is
ryan 2025-05-06 03:52 p.m.
This'll be what you settle for
ryan 2025-05-06 03:52 p.m.
That goes for you too James
huddy. 2025-05-06 03:52 p.m.
Your Honor I will happily forward an image, as I did to snapchat bot
huddy. 2025-05-06 03:52 p.m.
May I continue with questioning?
ryan 2025-05-06 03:53 p.m.
Absolutely
huddy. 2025-05-06 03:53 p.m.
Actually I've decided to go out, will continue later
ryan 2025-05-06 03:54 p.m.
Use it or lose it
ryanOr a lawyer getting dicked on in his own direct?
Toby 2025-05-06 03:57 p.m.
LOL
Toby 2025-05-06 03:58 p.m.
Guys my legs hurt, I've been on the stand for days now
ryan 2025-05-06 03:59 p.m.
Shut up
Toby 2025-05-06 07:05 p.m.@ryan can we assume james is done with me
ryan 2025-05-07 02:13 a.m.
No
ryan 2025-05-07 06:10 p.m.@huddy. !
ryan 2025-05-07 06:10 p.m.
Until 6P CDT or you'll waive the witness
ryan 2025-05-07 06:10 p.m.
Actually
ryanUntil 6P CDT or you'll waive the witness
Toby 2025-05-07 07:18 p.m.@ryan
ryan 2025-05-07 10:10 p.m.
Yea
ryan 2025-05-07 10:11 p.m.@Evexom you may cross
huddy.spedvictor 2025-05-07 10:35 p.m.
If I can add… I think my lawyer’s question was left unanswered
huddy.ryan 2025-05-07 10:50 p.m.
Please answer @Toby
ryanUntil 6P CDT or you'll waive the witness
huddy. 2025-05-08 03:25 a.m.@ryan ??
huddy.huddy. 2025-05-08 03:25 a.m.
Your Honor, I am still waiting for a response to this question....
huddy.Toby 2025-05-08 05:32 a.m.
Somewhat
huddy.Your Honor, I am still waiting for a response to this question....
ryan 2025-05-08 01:47 p.m.
You should've communicated that
huddy.ryan 2025-05-08 01:47 p.m.
Also 6P was 50 minutes after that
ryanYou should've communicated that
huddy. 2025-05-08 01:48 p.m.
Excuse me?
huddy. 2025-05-08 01:48 p.m.
The question was sitting there, waiting to be responded to?
TobySomewhat
ryan 2025-05-08 01:48 p.m.
Bingo
huddy. 2025-05-08 01:48 p.m.
I'm now supposed to detail everything sent in this channel, again?
ryan 2025-05-08 01:48 p.m.
You got your response
huddy. 2025-05-08 01:48 p.m.
Indeed I did, hence why I will soon send another question.
ryan 2025-05-08 01:48 p.m.
If you do, it'll be jail for you
ryan 2025-05-08 01:49 p.m.
This is @Evexom 's cross
huddy. 2025-05-08 01:49 p.m.
Why?
ryan 2025-05-08 01:49 p.m.
And if he doesn't take it up within a timely manner he'll suffer the same fate
huddy. 2025-05-08 01:49 p.m.
Your Honor, I didn't not take up anything
huddy. 2025-05-08 01:49 p.m.
I was waiting for the witness to take up the question
huddy. 2025-05-08 01:49 p.m.
which he was asked
huddy. 2025-05-08 01:49 p.m.
How have I got anything to do with that
huddy.Your Honor, I didn't not take up anything
ryan 2025-05-08 01:49 p.m.
Your direct examination is over.
Evexom 2025-05-08 01:49 p.m.
Give me one minute to review this and I'll do cross
Evexom 2025-05-08 01:49 p.m.
Was dealing with <#1351423182376013917> , sorry
huddy. 2025-05-08 01:50 p.m.
You have yet to officially inform me why my examination is over...
huddy. 2025-05-08 01:50 p.m.
Could you give that a go?
huddy.You have yet to officially inform me why my examination is over...
ryan 2025-05-08 01:51 p.m.
I did actually
ryanYour direct examination is over.
ryan 2025-05-08 01:51 p.m.
Evexom 2025-05-08 01:55 p.m.
No cross actually. We waive @ryan
Evexom 2025-05-08 01:55 p.m.
Next witness please & thankyou !
ryan 2025-05-08 01:55 p.m.@huddy. Back to you
ryan 2025-05-08 01:57 p.m.
Also two things
ryan 2025-05-08 01:57 p.m.<#1370095664893137058> exists so you and fliply can ask questions or talk about matters regarding this case, please use that if you have a gripe about this case
Evexom 2025-05-08 01:58 p.m.
So leave this for trial?
ryan 2025-05-08 01:59 p.m.
2. From here on out, the 24 hour rule is enforced, witnesses must be questioned within 24 hours of their responses or that witness will be waived for whatever examination is occuring
EvexomSo leave this for trial?
ryan 2025-05-08 01:59 p.m.
Please
Evexom 2025-05-08 01:59 p.m.
ryanClick to see attachment.
huddy. 2025-05-08 02:00 p.m.
Sir I have appendicitis in my right eye so I am unable to read the reasoning in that message
TobySomewhat
huddy. 2025-05-08 02:00 p.m.
Because that 24 hour rule was also previously enforced, and it has not been 24 hours since this message...
Evexom 2025-05-08 02:01 p.m.
Can you just do your redirect already?
ryanToby 2025-05-08 02:04 p.m.
I have no access
TobyI have no access
ryan 2025-05-08 02:04 p.m.
You're not supposed to.
ryanYou're not supposed to.
Toby 2025-05-08 02:05 p.m.
Why not
huddy.Because that 24 hour rule was also previously enforced, and it has not been 24 hours since this message...
ryan 2025-05-08 02:05 p.m.
Do you wish to redirect?
ryan 2025-05-08 02:05 p.m.
I will allow it
TobyWhy not
ryan 2025-05-08 02:05 p.m.
Too many cooks in the kitchen
Toby 2025-05-08 02:05 p.m.
Ok
ryanDo you wish to redirect?
huddy. 2025-05-08 02:05 p.m.
Hmm
huddy. 2025-05-08 02:06 p.m.
It's a tough decision
huddy. 2025-05-08 02:06 p.m.
I think maybe so
ryanToo many cooks in the kitchen
Evexom 2025-05-08 02:06 p.m.
Toby isn't a cook, he's simply a dishwasher
huddy.Hmm
ryan 2025-05-08 02:07 p.m.
Just start promptly
ryan 2025-05-08 02:07 p.m.
I'll be lax with the scope, just don't be outrageous please
huddy. 2025-05-08 02:51 p.m.@Toby Does your firm utilize contracts with clients to determine pay?
huddy.Evexom 2025-05-08 02:58 p.m.
Objection, beyond the scope of direct.
@ryan
huddy. 2025-05-08 03:00 p.m.
What the actual gyatt is the point in doing redirect with my own witness who is the Defendant when he was taken from me
huddy. 2025-05-08 03:00 p.m.
This is the most counter intuitive process ever
huddy. 2025-05-08 03:00 p.m.
if I can ask literally nothing
huddy. 2025-05-08 03:01 p.m.
I remind the court that I didn't choose for Defendant to ignore my question for 2 days
Evexom 2025-05-08 03:02 p.m.
If you want to waive redirect and move on to the next witness, nobody is stopping you
huddy. 2025-05-08 03:06 p.m.
Can you please stop talking to me when I'm talking to the court; it's incredibly unhelpful and like a little mouse chirping in my ear
huddy. 2025-05-08 03:07 p.m.
Except mice don't chirp
EvexomObjection, beyond the scope of direct. @ryan
ryan 2025-05-08 03:21 p.m.
Overruled
ryanOverruled
Evexom 2025-05-08 03:22 p.m.
In that case we request we have a re-cross as they are introducing new material on redirect
Evexom 2025-05-08 03:23 p.m.
After they conclude ofc
ryan 2025-05-08 03:23 p.m.
Yes that would be fine
huddy.Toby 2025-05-08 03:31 p.m.
Depends, it isn’t a straight forward answer, we've under went reforms so it's different, so you'll have to specify
TobyDepends, it isn’t a straight forward answer, we've under went reforms so it's different, so you'll have to specify
huddy. 2025-05-08 03:31 p.m.
What would you like me to specify? The question is simple - is the amount owed to you by a client agreed to by a contract?
huddy.What would you like me to specify? The question is simple - is the amount owed to you by a client agreed to by a contract?
Toby 2025-05-08 03:33 p.m.
Well are you talking about general consultations? Retainers, or what? Your question is vague
TobyWell are you talking about general consultations? Retainers, or what? Your question is vague
huddy. 2025-05-08 03:35 p.m.
Retainers
Toby 2025-05-08 03:36 p.m.
Yes, we do retainer agreements
TobyYes, we do retainer agreements
huddy. 2025-05-08 03:36 p.m.
What do these agreements contain in them?
huddy.What do these agreements contain in them?
Toby 2025-05-08 03:37 p.m.
Are you expecting me to go clause by clause?
TobyAre you expecting me to go clause by clause?
huddy. 2025-05-08 03:37 p.m.
Absolutely!
Toby 2025-05-08 03:37 p.m.
Yeah no
huddy. 2025-05-08 03:38 p.m.
Your Honor, please instruct the witness to answer the question @ryan
Toby 2025-05-08 03:38 p.m.
They contain price, duration, date, etx
huddy. 2025-05-08 03:38 p.m.
This is a trial involving corporate law
huddy. 2025-05-08 03:38 p.m.
Defendant needs to act like it
huddy.Your Honor, please instruct the witness to answer the question @ryan
Toby 2025-05-08 03:38 p.m.
Mate I'm not going clause by clause for a retainer agreement when each one can be different for particular clients(edited)
huddy. 2025-05-08 03:38 p.m.
I am not your mate.
huddy.Toby 2025-05-08 03:39 p.m.
Objection argumentative
TobyMate I'm not going clause by clause for a retainer agreement when each one can be different for particular clients(edited)
huddy. 2025-05-08 03:39 p.m.
Objection, misgendering
huddy. 2025-05-08 03:39 p.m.
Do you utilize a template?
huddy. 2025-05-08 03:39 p.m.
for corporate retainers?
huddy.Objection, misgendering
Toby 2025-05-08 03:39 p.m.
I didn't missgender
Toby 2025-05-08 03:39 p.m.
It's unisex
huddy. 2025-05-08 03:39 p.m.
I am a non-binary tablecloth
huddy. 2025-05-08 03:39 p.m.
I have no sex
huddy.for corporate retainers?
Toby 2025-05-08 03:40 p.m.
Can you put that in one question please
huddy. 2025-05-08 03:41 p.m.Do you utilize a template for corporate retainers?
Toby 2025-05-08 03:42 p.m.
Yes
TobyYes
huddy. 2025-05-08 03:42 p.m.
# Could you detail the headings of the different sections in this template?
Toby 2025-05-08 03:42 p.m.
Can you not shout at me
huddy.# Could you detail the headings of the different sections in this template?
Toby 2025-05-08 03:42 p.m.
Not from the top of my head no
TobyNot from the top of my head no
huddy. 2025-05-08 03:50 p.m.
How many times have you signed such contracts in the past month?
huddy.How many times have you signed such contracts in the past month?
Toby 2025-05-08 04:08 p.m.
I dont see how that's relevant
TobyI dont see how that's relevant
huddy. 2025-05-08 04:25 p.m.
Excuse me?
huddy. 2025-05-08 04:25 p.m.
Answer the question
huddy. 2025-05-08 04:25 p.m.
Don’t make me type in bold.
Toby 2025-05-08 04:32 p.m.
No i object to relevance
huddy.Defendant needs to act like it
ryan 2025-05-08 06:27 p.m.
So does counsel.
huddy.How many times have you signed such contracts in the past month?
Evexom 2025-05-08 06:27 p.m.
Objection, relevance
ryan 2025-05-08 06:27 p.m.
^^^
ryan 2025-05-08 06:27 p.m.
I will hold off on ruling until james issues a rebuttal
Evexom 2025-05-08 06:28 p.m.
Sorry been dealing with another trial & other stuff
huddy.# Could you detail the headings of the different sections in this template?
ryan 2025-05-08 06:28 p.m.
Please do not shout at the witness.
ryan 2025-05-08 06:28 p.m.
You practice law like you were raised in a barn.
Evexom 2025-05-08 06:28 p.m.
Thats offensive to people raised in barns
ryan 2025-05-08 06:28 p.m.
Shut up hippie
huddy.# Could you detail the headings of the different sections in this template?
Evexom 2025-05-08 06:29 p.m.
Objection, badgering
ryan 2025-05-08 06:29 p.m.
Nah
ryan 2025-05-08 06:30 p.m.
Evexom 2025-05-08 06:32 p.m.
:C
huddy.What do these agreements contain in them?
Evexom 2025-05-08 06:34 p.m.
Objection, vague
ryan 2025-05-08 06:34 p.m.
How.
ryan 2025-05-08 06:34 p.m.
Ambiguous /=/ vague
Evexom 2025-05-08 06:35 p.m.
ok
Evexom 2025-05-08 06:35 p.m.
objection ambiguous
Evexom 2025-05-08 06:35 p.m.
idek if thats how you spell it but im too tired for this
ryan 2025-05-08 06:35 p.m.
That is NOT an objection recognized in my Court.
Evexom 2025-05-08 06:35 p.m.
WHATR
Evexom 2025-05-08 06:36 p.m.
ok
Evexom 2025-05-08 06:36 p.m.
well
Evexom 2025-05-08 06:36 p.m.
da farq
ryan 2025-05-08 06:37 p.m.
Please reference Lakoff's (1970) test for a delineation between the two.
ryanEvexom 2025-05-08 06:38 p.m.
Can we get a library of random ass documents you always have?
ryan 2025-05-08 06:38 p.m.
No.
Evexom 2025-05-08 06:38 p.m.
Unfortunate
ryan 2025-05-08 06:38 p.m.
I have, however, probably a lot of them.
ryanI will hold off on ruling until james issues a rebuttal
huddy. 2025-05-09 07:30 a.m.
Your Honor, I'm getting somewhere
huddy. 2025-05-09 07:30 a.m.
Truswt
huddy.Your Honor, I'm getting somewhere
ryan 2025-05-09 11:52 a.m.
Good enough for me
huddy. 2025-05-09 12:09 p.m.@Toby Answer the question boi
Toby 2025-05-09 12:17 p.m.
I have no exact figure
TobyI have no exact figure
huddy. 2025-05-09 12:33 p.m.
Why don't you have an exact figure?
huddy. 2025-05-09 12:34 p.m.
I just asked you a question, find the exact figure and answer it.
Toby 2025-05-09 12:52 p.m.
No
Toby 2025-05-09 12:52 p.m.
I don't have the figures
Toby 2025-05-09 12:52 p.m.
Nor do we keep track of the numbers
TobyNor do we keep track of the numbers
huddy. 2025-05-09 01:08 p.m.
Do you keep records of your cases?
huddy.Do you keep records of your cases?
Toby 2025-05-09 01:40 p.m.
We keep a record of transcripts
ryan 2025-05-10 05:59 p.m.@huddy.
ryanToby 2025-05-10 06:36 p.m.
How much longer is this going to take, I swear this is the longest examination of a witness ever
ryan 2025-05-10 06:37 p.m.
incorrect
ryanincorrect
Toby 2025-05-10 07:06 p.m.
Who has the record
TobyWho has the record
ryan 2025-05-10 07:12 p.m.
Probably me in a case somewhere
ryan 2025-05-10 07:13 p.m.
I've done a lot of continuous trials
ryan 2025-05-10 07:13 p.m.
Actually
ryan 2025-05-10 07:15 p.m.[D] Criminal Case
Prosecutor: Codiyx, Lead Prosecutor / TacticalDevelop3r, Co-counsel
Charges: 2 M.C.C. § 15 Voluntary Manslaughter
L.C.C. § 1 Brandishing a Firearm in City Limits
L.C.C. § 2 Discharging a Firearm in City Limits
Name(s) of Defendant(s): Ryanepicgajer
Give a statement of the event: The defendant, Ryanepicgajer, ...
Charges: 2 M.C.C. § 15 Voluntary Manslaughter
L.C.C. § 1 Brandishing a Firearm in City Limits
L.C.C. § 2 Discharging a Firearm in City Limits
Comments
2Labels
Criminal, Dismissed w/Prejudiceryan 2025-05-10 07:16 p.m.
The witness was from SoKo and my lawyer was from Ontario
ryanProbably me in a case somewhere
Toby 2025-05-10 07:18 p.m.
I meant Clark dawg
ryan 2025-05-10 08:06 p.m.
Alr
ryan 2025-05-10 08:06 p.m.@Evexom recross
huddy. 2025-05-11 03:38 a.m.
I was asleep mb
huddy. 2025-05-11 03:38 a.m.@ryan May I continue??
huddy. 2025-05-11 03:38 a.m.
oops 2 marks
Toby 2025-05-11 04:27 a.m.
No bro you've had long enough
Toby 2025-05-11 04:28 a.m.
That's my 2 pence
huddy. 2025-05-11 04:51 a.m.
Sorry did I ask you?
huddy.Sorry did I ask you?
Toby 2025-05-11 05:15 a.m.
Low IQ response
huddy. 2025-05-11 05:17 a.m.
Can you please hush for once
huddy. 2025-05-11 05:17 a.m.
you used to be funny but then it gets boring ok?
ryanEvexom 2025-05-11 01:13 p.m.
no
huddy.you used to be funny but then it gets boring ok?
Toby 2025-05-11 05:45 p.m.
Evexom 2025-05-12 02:43 p.m.
The firm has been sold to @ian , may you please deport @Toby from the channel?
@ryan
Toby 2025-05-12 02:44 p.m.
Deport
TobyDeport
Evexom 2025-05-12 02:51 p.m.
Yeah you're a mexican now
huddy. 2025-05-12 02:54 p.m.@Toby is this real
huddy. 2025-05-12 02:55 p.m.
This is so sad
huddy. 2025-05-12 02:56 p.m.
it's almost as if you finally learnt the definition of a conflict of interest 
huddy.it's almost as if you finally learnt the definition of a conflict of interest
Toby 2025-05-12 03:06 p.m.
It's almost as sad as you still not having learnt how to conduct a basic trial
huddy. 2025-05-12 03:10 p.m.
If only I could conduct a trial
huddy. 2025-05-12 03:10 p.m.
that's my dream
huddy. 2025-05-12 03:10 p.m.
it's such a shame that I have a life
huddy. 2025-05-12 03:11 p.m.
now that you lost your firm, are you going to continue sending me bestiality in dms or is that over
spedvictor 2025-05-12 03:13 p.m.
???
huddy.now that you lost your firm, are you going to continue sending me bestiality in dms or is that over
Toby 2025-05-12 03:22 p.m.
1. I never lost my firm, I transferred ownership
2. Are you going to stop your unethical practises????
2. Are you going to stop your unethical practises????
Toby 2025-05-12 03:22 p.m.
Also having a life isn't an excuse for your incompetence
huddy. 2025-05-12 03:22 p.m.
why tf would i stop unethical practices
Toby 2025-05-12 03:22 p.m.
So nice try
Toby 2025-05-12 03:22 p.m.
You're so right
TobyAlso having a life isn't an excuse for your incompetence
spedvictor 2025-05-12 03:23 p.m.
Alright guys
spedvictor 2025-05-12 03:23 p.m.
Lets eat the chill pill
huddy. 2025-05-12 03:25 p.m.
Agreed
huddy. 2025-05-12 03:25 p.m.
Conduct absolutely unbecoming of the owner of Clifford Chance
huddy. 2025-05-12 03:25 p.m.
oh yeah
Evexom 2025-05-12 03:32 p.m.@ryan We move for sanctions against opposing counsel, they are badgering this witness
huddy. 2025-05-12 03:33 p.m.
What witness
huddy. 2025-05-12 03:33 p.m.
The witness who is no longer the witness? The witness who is not currently on the stand?
huddy. 2025-05-12 03:33 p.m.
The witness who sent a fish sucking a dick in my dms?
huddy. 2025-05-12 03:33 p.m.
Oh right
huddy.The witness who is no longer the witness? The witness who is not currently on the stand?
Toby 2025-05-12 03:59 p.m.
I'm still on the stand
huddy.The witness who sent a fish sucking a dick in my dms?
Toby 2025-05-12 03:59 p.m.
Consider yourself lucky that you're covered by absolute privilege(edited)
huddy. 2025-05-12 04:04 p.m.
Sure I'll consider myself luck, whatever the frigg that means
TobyI'm still on the stand
huddy. 2025-05-12 04:04 p.m.
Doing what
huddy.Doing what
Toby 2025-05-12 04:04 p.m.
waiting to be excused
Toby 2025-05-22 12:23 p.m.
100% the longest witness testimony hearing ever
huddy. 2025-05-22 03:28 p.m.
Your Honor
huddy. 2025-05-22 03:28 p.m.
We have newly gathered evidence to show that Defendant is in fact a black male
Toby 2025-05-27 07:16 a.m.
Good thing I'm not the defendant
adlithestevenson 2025-06-01 11:19 p.m.
Hello
adlithestevenson 2025-06-01 11:19 p.m.
Where were we?
Evexom 2025-06-01 11:26 p.m.
Idek
adlithestevensonWhere were we?
Toby 2025-06-02 05:00 a.m.
I'm not the defendant anymore
adlithestevenson 2025-06-02 03:21 p.m.
Why is this the case
adlithestevensonWhy is this the case
Toby 2025-06-02 06:10 p.m.
Cause I resigned and handed over ownership to @ian
adlithestevenson 2025-06-02 07:15 p.m.
Okay
adlithestevenson used /remove
clerkFlow Bot2025-06-02 07:24 p.m. @adlithestevenson has removed @Toby from the case channel.
Case Modified
adlithestevenson used /add
clerkFlow Bot2025-06-02 07:24 p.m. @adlithestevenson has added @ian to the case channel.
Case Modified
adlithestevenson 2025-06-02 07:25 p.m.@Toby is excused from the stand.
adlithestevenson 2025-06-02 07:25 p.m.@huddy. is to continue with their presentation of evidence within 24 hours or face sanctions.
huddy. 2025-06-03 03:30 a.m.
lmfao
huddy. 2025-06-03 03:31 a.m.
Plaintiff calls Plaintiff @spedvictor to the stand
adlithestevenson used /add
clerkFlow Bot2025-06-04 12:50 a.m. @adlithestevenson has added @spedvictor to the case channel.
Case Modified
adlithestevenson 2025-06-04 12:54 a.m.
Do you swear to tell the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth under the pains and penalties of perjury?
adlithestevensonDo you swear to tell the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth under the pains and penalties of perjury?
spedvictor 2025-06-04 10:41 a.m.
I do
adlithestevenson 2025-06-04 01:07 p.m.
Okay
adlithestevenson 2025-06-04 01:07 p.m.@huddy.
huddy. 2025-06-04 01:14 p.m.
Howdy @spedvictor
spedvictor 2025-06-04 01:14 p.m.
Hello
huddy. 2025-06-04 01:14 p.m.
Please state your name for the record
spedvictor 2025-06-04 01:15 p.m.
kingvictor1000
spedvictorkingvictor1000
huddy. 2025-06-04 01:15 p.m.
And your relation to this case?
spedvictor 2025-06-04 01:16 p.m.
I am the Plaintiff
huddy. 2025-06-04 03:49 p.m.@spedvictor Are you aware of what Kingley Napley is?
huddy.spedvictor 2025-06-04 04:30 p.m.
Yes
spedvictorYes
huddy. 2025-06-05 03:24 a.m.
Would you be able to inform the court what Kingley Napley is?
huddy.Would you be able to inform the court what Kingley Napley is?
spedvictor 2025-06-05 01:00 p.m.
They’re a public law firm that take and bring in a wide variety of clients
spedvictorThey’re a public law firm that take and bring in a wide variety of clients
huddy. 2025-06-05 01:07 p.m.
Have you ever approached Kingley Napley for their services?
huddy.Have you ever approached Kingley Napley for their services?
spedvictor 2025-06-05 01:08 p.m.
Yes
spedvictorYes
huddy. 2025-06-05 01:09 p.m.
When was this?
huddy.When was this?
spedvictor 2025-06-05 01:11 p.m.
November 30th of 2024
spedvictorNovember 30th of 2024
huddy. 2025-06-05 01:12 p.m.
And how did you approach them for their services?
huddy.And how did you approach them for their services?
spedvictor 2025-06-05 01:13 p.m.
I opened a ticket in the server
spedvictorI opened a ticket in the server
huddy. 2025-06-05 01:13 p.m.
What was the name of the panel that you opened the ticket in?
huddy.What was the name of the panel that you opened the ticket in?
spedvictor 2025-06-05 01:15 p.m.
Are you referring to the one where the button was to open the ticket
spedvictorAre you referring to the one where the button was to open the ticket
huddy. 2025-06-05 01:16 p.m.
Indeed ma'am
huddy.Indeed ma'am
spedvictor 2025-06-05 01:17 p.m.
I believe it was something like “Consultation Information”.
spedvictorI believe it was something like “Consultation Information”.
huddy. 2025-06-05 01:20 p.m.
And what was the purpose of the consultation information ticket function?
huddy.And what was the purpose of the consultation information ticket function?
spedvictor 2025-06-05 01:23 p.m.
The purpose was to allow regular people like me to use the services they offer
spedvictorThe purpose was to allow regular people like me to use the services they offer
huddy. 2025-06-05 04:04 p.m.
And for what reason did you open a consultancy ticket within their server?
spedvictorThey’re a public law firm that take and bring in a wide variety of clients
Evexom 2025-06-05 05:16 p.m.
Objection, speculation
spedvictorI believe it was something like “Consultation Information”.
Evexom 2025-06-05 05:17 p.m.
Objection, speculation
huddy.And for what reason did you open a consultancy ticket within their server?
spedvictor 2025-06-05 05:24 p.m.
To get a retainer contract for my business
Evexom 2025-06-05 05:29 p.m.@ryan ^^
Evexom 2025-06-05 05:29 p.m.
Can you also instruct the witness to stop talking during pending objections?
ryan 2025-06-06 02:15 a.m.@spedvictor please cease communication if an objection has been lodged
EvexomObjection, speculation
adlithestevenson 2025-06-06 03:10 a.m.
overruled
EvexomObjection, speculation
adlithestevenson 2025-06-06 03:10 a.m.
overruled
spedvictorTo get a retainer contract for my business
huddy. 2025-06-06 06:13 a.m.
What did you request, upon opening the ticket?
huddy.What did you request, upon opening the ticket?
spedvictor 2025-06-06 05:35 p.m.
I requested a retainer with Kingley Napely because I needed contracts/documents created for my business.
spedvictorI requested a retainer with Kingley Napely because I needed contracts/documents created for my business.
huddy. 2025-06-07 04:10 a.m.
And what was the response given to you?
huddy.And what was the response given to you?
spedvictor 2025-06-07 04:24 a.m.
They seemed willing to help me out with what I needed. We had a conversation that lead to me signing a contract with them.
spedvictorThey seemed willing to help me out with what I needed. We had a conversation that lead to me signing a contract with them.
huddy. 2025-06-07 04:27 a.m.
Who wrote this contract?
huddy.Who wrote this contract?
spedvictor 2025-06-07 04:32 a.m.
tobyrulles4568
spedvictortobyrulles4568
huddy. 2025-06-07 05:51 a.m.
Did he sign the contrac?
huddy.Did he sign the contrac?
spedvictor 2025-06-07 05:52 a.m.
Yes, he signed the contract.
spedvictorYes, he signed the contract.
huddy. 2025-06-07 05:53 a.m.
Did he send you the contract in the ticket?
huddy.Did he send you the contract in the ticket?
spedvictor 2025-06-07 05:54 a.m.
Yes
huddy. 2025-06-07 06:01 a.m.RETAINER AGREEMENT This Retainer Agreement ("Agreement") is made between Kingley Napley ("the Firm") and the Ultimate Fighting of Columbia ("the Client"). The terms of this Agreement are as follows: Term and Renewal This Agreement shall be in effect for a period of two (2) months from the date s... 
I am now going to present to you a document listed in your discovery.
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1TbYSJJV5qjmNpKqHG5PVP3YzQxQ9S1QvHxFVzeyhYdU/edit?usp=sharing
Do you recognise this document?
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1TbYSJJV5qjmNpKqHG5PVP3YzQxQ9S1QvHxFVzeyhYdU/edit?usp=sharing
Do you recognise this document?
huddy.I am now going to present to you a document listed in your discovery. https://docs.google.com/document/d/1TbYSJJV5qjmNpKqHG5PVP3YzQxQ9S1QvHxFVzeyhYdU/edit?usp=sharing Do you reco...
spedvictor 2025-06-07 06:01 a.m.
I recognize this document
spedvictorI recognize this document
huddy. 2025-06-07 06:01 a.m.
How so?
huddy.How so?
spedvictor 2025-06-07 06:02 a.m.
It was the document that tobyrulles4568 sent me and prompted me to sign
spedvictorIt was the document that tobyrulles4568 sent me and prompted me to sign
huddy. 2025-06-07 06:03 a.m.
Is this the contract we've just been discussing?
huddy.Is this the contract we've just been discussing?
spedvictor 2025-06-07 06:04 a.m.
Yes, I would also like to note that when I signed it he also gave me a returned version in pdf form.
spedvictorYes, I would also like to note that when I signed it he also gave me a returned version in pdf form.
huddy. 2025-06-07 06:05 a.m.
And is that returned version the exact same as this document listed in your discovery?
huddy.And is that returned version the exact same as this document listed in your discovery?
spedvictor 2025-06-07 06:07 a.m.
Yes
huddy. 2025-06-07 06:08 a.m.
Has this document been altered in any way since it was presented to you?
spedvictor 2025-06-07 06:08 a.m.
Not that I am aware of, no.
huddy. 2025-06-07 06:10 a.m.@adlithestevenson Plaintiff moves to enter this Exhibit into evidence
ryan 2025-06-08 10:41 p.m.
James
ryan 2025-06-08 10:41 p.m.
I swear to God
ryan 2025-06-08 10:41 p.m.
Stop pinging the wrong account
ryan 2025-06-08 10:41 p.m.@huddy. you ping THIS account
ryan 2025-06-08 10:41 p.m.
If you do it again i'll string you up
huddy. 2025-06-09 02:48 a.m.
Shlawg what since when did bro regain access
huddy. 2025-06-09 02:48 a.m.
no one tell me dis shit
huddy. 2025-06-09 02:48 a.m.@ryan Plaintiff moves to enter this Exhibit into evidence
UserMessage could not be loaded.
ryan 2025-06-09 04:32 a.m.
UserMessage could not be loaded.
ryan 2025-06-09 04:33 a.m.
UserMessage could not be loaded.
ryan 2025-06-09 04:33 a.m.
huddy. 2025-06-09 07:17 a.m.
wowie
huddy. 2025-06-09 07:18 a.m.
how absurd that i missed two messages averaging two words each
huddy. 2025-06-09 07:18 a.m.
Plaintiff moves to enter this Exhibit into evidence
huddy.how absurd that i missed two messages averaging two words each
ian 2025-06-09 03:21 p.m.
Actually they average two words together not each
huddy. 2025-06-09 04:05 p.m.
Weren't you found guilty of homosexuality?
huddy. 2025-06-09 04:05 p.m.
Sybaui
Evexom 2025-06-09 04:12 p.m.
Your honor we move for sanctions against opposing counsel for their inappropriate language during court proceedings. @ryan
ryan 2025-06-10 02:21 a.m.
Yup
ryan 2025-06-10 02:22 a.m.@huddy. You are held in direct criminal contempt. Is there anything you wish to say in your defense?
huddy.ryan 2025-06-10 02:25 a.m.
Objections @Evexom
Evexom 2025-06-10 02:25 a.m.
No objections
ryan 2025-06-10 02:27 a.m.
So admitted
ryanhuddy. 2025-06-10 03:42 a.m.
Free me up 
ryan 2025-06-10 03:56 a.m.
Okay
huddy. 2025-06-10 03:56 a.m.
I'm not homophobic I swear
huddy. 2025-06-10 03:56 a.m.
I love the gays
huddy. 2025-06-10 03:57 a.m.
wait I have a video somewhere i can prove it
ryan 2025-06-10 03:57 a.m.
I find you in criminal contempt of this court for repeated outbursts while trial has occured. I have tried to be fair and patient, but it gets to a point. You are to pay a fine of $5,000 and serve a sentence of 30 minutes in the county jail.
ryan 2025-06-10 03:57 a.m.
What is a time we can meet in game to execute this sentence?
huddy. 2025-06-10 03:59 a.m.
Why would we meet in game to execute this sentence
huddy. 2025-06-10 03:59 a.m.
Doesn't bro know how to do it manually
ryan 2025-06-10 03:59 a.m.
Fines
ryan 2025-06-10 03:59 a.m.
I believe you still need to be in game
huddy. 2025-06-10 03:59 a.m.
I don't sir some other guy gave me contempt and I wasn't in game
ryan 2025-06-10 04:00 a.m.
What is a time
ryan 2025-06-10 04:00 a.m.
We could even do it now
huddy. 2025-06-10 04:00 a.m.
I'm out
ryan 2025-06-10 04:00 a.m.
You're always out
ryan 2025-06-10 04:00 a.m.
when will you be in
huddy. 2025-06-10 04:00 a.m.
later
ryan 2025-06-10 04:01 a.m.
Ping me.
huddy. 2025-06-10 04:01 a.m.@ryan
huddy. 2025-06-10 04:01 a.m.
??
ryan 2025-06-10 04:02 a.m.
When you are avaliabkle
ryan 2025-06-10 04:02 a.m.
You silly goose
ryan 2025-06-10 04:02 a.m.
I am TRYING to apply to law school.
ryan 2025-06-10 04:03 a.m.
Actually
ryan 2025-06-10 04:03 a.m.
I will waive you punishment
ryan 2025-06-10 04:03 a.m.<#1370095664893137058>
huddy. 2025-06-10 04:08 a.m.@spedvictor Could you read out section 1 - Term and Renewal?
huddy.spedvictor 2025-06-10 04:08 a.m.
Referring to the document you linked?
spedvictor 2025-06-10 04:09 a.m.
It reads "This Agreement shall be in effect for a period of two (2) months from the date signed below unless terminated earlier in accordance with this Agreement. The Agreement may be renewed for an additional two (2) month period upon mutual written agreement by both parties."
spedvictorIt reads "This Agreement shall be in effect for a period of two (2) months from the date signed below unless terminated earlier in accordance with this Agreement. The Agreement may...
huddy. 2025-06-10 04:13 a.m.
So was the legal retainer agreed to last for 2 months?
huddy.So was the legal retainer agreed to last for 2 months?
spedvictor 2025-06-10 04:13 a.m.
Yes
spedvictorYes
huddy. 2025-06-10 04:15 a.m.
Could you read out the terms of 2. (a)?
huddy. 2025-06-10 04:15 a.m.
Just a please.
huddy.Could you read out the terms of 2. (a)?
spedvictor 2025-06-10 04:16 a.m.
a. By Either Party: Both the Firm and the Client may withdraw from this Agreement at any time, for any reason, by providing one (1) week written notice to the other party.
huddy. 2025-06-10 04:17 a.m.@spedvictor Did you ever provide a one week notice prior to the end of the 2 month agreement, that you wished to withdraw from the agreement?
huddy.spedvictor 2025-06-10 04:17 a.m.
No
spedvictorNo
huddy. 2025-06-10 04:17 a.m.
Did you ever wish to withdraw from the agreement?
huddy.Did you ever wish to withdraw from the agreement?
spedvictor 2025-06-10 04:18 a.m.
No
spedvictorNo
huddy. 2025-06-10 04:20 a.m.
Could you read out 2.(b) now please?
huddy.Could you read out 2.(b) now please?
spedvictor 2025-06-10 04:20 a.m.
b. By the Firm: Kingley Napley reserves the right to cancel this Agreement immediately under the following circumstances:
If the Client is disrespectful to Firm staff.
If the Client becomes unresponsive or fails to cooperate with the Firm's efforts.
If the Client fails or refuses to pay fees due under this Agreement.
If the Client is disrespectful to Firm staff.
If the Client becomes unresponsive or fails to cooperate with the Firm's efforts.
If the Client fails or refuses to pay fees due under this Agreement.
spedvictorb. By the Firm: Kingley Napley reserves the right to cancel this Agreement immediately under the following circumstances: If the Client is disrespectful to Firm staff. If the Clien...
huddy. 2025-06-10 04:21 a.m.
At any point in time, were you disrespectful to Kingley Napley staff?
huddy.At any point in time, were you disrespectful to Kingley Napley staff?
spedvictor 2025-06-10 04:21 a.m.
No
spedvictorNo
huddy. 2025-06-10 04:21 a.m.
At any point in time, were you unresponsive?
huddy.At any point in time, were you unresponsive?
spedvictor 2025-06-10 04:23 a.m.
No
spedvictorNo
huddy. 2025-06-10 04:23 a.m.
At any point in time, did you fail to cooperate with the Firm's efforts?
huddy.At any point in time, did you fail to cooperate with the Firm's efforts?
spedvictor 2025-06-10 04:24 a.m.
No
spedvictorNo
huddy. 2025-06-10 04:25 a.m.
At any point in time, did you fail to pay the fees agreed in the contract?
huddy.At any point in time, did you fail to pay the fees agreed in the contract?
spedvictor 2025-06-10 04:25 a.m.
No
spedvictorNo
huddy. 2025-06-10 04:27 a.m.
Could you read out 4 - Scope of legal Services?
huddy.Could you read out 4 - Scope of legal Services?
spedvictor 2025-06-10 04:27 a.m.
The scope of legal services to be provided by Kingley Napley under this Agreement will be defined as:
Administrative Legal Work
Court Representation
Legal Advice
Administrative Legal Work
Court Representation
Legal Advice
spedvictorThe scope of legal services to be provided by Kingley Napley under this Agreement will be defined as: Administrative Legal Work Court Representation Legal Advice
huddy. 2025-06-11 02:43 a.m.
Which of these did you request?
huddy.Which of these did you request?
spedvictor 2025-06-11 02:48 a.m.
Administrative Legal Work.
spedvictorAdministrative Legal Work.
huddy. 2025-06-11 02:48 a.m.
Could you specify the details of what you requested?
spedvictor 2025-06-11 02:48 a.m.
That was the main thing I needed
huddy.Could you specify the details of what you requested?
spedvictor 2025-06-11 02:49 a.m.
I requested contracts for my business
spedvictorI requested contracts for my business
huddy. 2025-06-11 06:12 a.m.
From 0% to 100%, what percentage of your requested work was completed by Kingley Napley?
ian 2025-06-11 06:30 a.m.
Objection, lack of foundation—he needs to specify what the actual work was for the Court to reasonably infer slapping a percentage on it is proper
ian 2025-06-11 06:30 a.m.@ryan
ian 2025-06-11 06:30 a.m.
Contracts for his business is very vague here
huddy. 2025-06-11 09:23 a.m.
Chat
huddy. 2025-06-11 09:23 a.m.
a contract is a contract
huddy. 2025-06-11 09:23 a.m.
you can clearly tell what percentage of a contract has been completed
huddy. 2025-06-11 09:23 a.m.
by the different sections as outlined
ian 2025-06-11 12:58 p.m.
A simple employment contract is much shorter and easier to complete than a shareholders' agreement, for example
huddy. 2025-06-11 01:44 p.m.
Lmfao actually @ryan I beg you with all my heart to sustain their objection
huddy. 2025-06-11 01:44 p.m.
Defendant is digging himself into his own hole
huddy. 2025-06-11 01:44 p.m.
and I am more than happy to oblige
spedvictor 2025-06-11 02:13 p.m.
Misclick sent something on accident SORRY
ryan 2025-06-15 03:39 a.m.
This still exists.
ianObjection, lack of foundation—he needs to specify what the actual work was for the Court to reasonably infer slapping a percentage on it is proper
ryan 2025-06-15 03:40 a.m.
I am going to presume you object to "From 0% to 100%, what percentage of your requested work was completed by Kingley Napley?"
Please reply to messages that you object to for future reference.
Please reply to messages that you object to for future reference.
ianObjection, lack of foundation—he needs to specify what the actual work was for the Court to reasonably infer slapping a percentage on it is proper
ryan 2025-06-15 03:40 a.m.
I will sustain the objection.
huddy.From 0% to 100%, what percentage of your requested work was completed by Kingley Napley?
ryan 2025-06-15 03:40 a.m.
Please reword.
spedvictorI requested contracts for my business
huddy. 2025-06-15 04:47 a.m.
Tell me more about the contracts requested
huddy.Tell me more about the contracts requested
spedvictor 2025-06-15 04:54 a.m.
I requested contracts that would allow me to bring people to work in and with my business
spedvictorI requested contracts that would allow me to bring people to work in and with my business
huddy. 2025-06-15 05:07 a.m.
How many?
huddy. 2025-06-15 05:07 a.m.
(contracts requested)
huddy.How many?
spedvictor 2025-06-15 05:13 a.m.
I specifically requested two contracts to start, and later on in the conversation between me and Kingley Napely they provided a synopsis that laid out least four different contracts which, ideally I would have also needed done.
spedvictorI specifically requested two contracts to start, and later on in the conversation between me and Kingley Napely they provided a synopsis that laid out least four different contract...
huddy. 2025-06-15 05:23 a.m.
So would that be 4 in total or 6 in total?
huddy. 2025-06-15 05:23 a.m.
or other
huddy.So would that be 4 in total or 6 in total?
spedvictor 2025-06-15 05:27 a.m.
Four
spedvictorFour
huddy. 2025-06-15 05:29 a.m.
And of these four, how many were presented to you?
huddy. 2025-06-15 05:30 a.m.
Withdrawn.
huddy. 2025-06-15 05:30 a.m.
And of these four, how many completed contracts were presented to you?
huddy.And of these four, how many completed contracts were presented to you?
spedvictor 2025-06-15 05:30 a.m.
Zero
spedvictorZero
huddy. 2025-06-15 05:31 a.m.
And of these four, how many incomplete contracts were presented to you?
huddy.And of these four, how many incomplete contracts were presented to you?
spedvictor 2025-06-15 05:31 a.m.
One
spedvictorOne
huddy. 2025-06-15 05:31 a.m.
And of these four, how many contracts were failed to be submitted to you?
spedvictor 2025-06-15 05:32 a.m.
Can you clarify, completed or incomplete
spedvictorCan you clarify, completed or incomplete
huddy. 2025-06-15 05:32 a.m.
How many of the four requested contracts were not even submitted to you for review?
huddy.How many of the four requested contracts were not even submitted to you for review?
spedvictor 2025-06-15 05:32 a.m.
Three
spedvictorThree
huddy. 2025-06-15 05:33 a.m.
Let's circle back to the one singular attempted submission. Did you inform Kingley Napley that it was not complete?
huddy.Let's circle back to the one singular attempted submission. Did you inform Kingley Napley that it was not complete?
spedvictor 2025-06-15 05:34 a.m.
Kingley Napely were the ones who informed me that it was not complete
spedvictorKingley Napely were the ones who informed me that it was not complete
huddy. 2025-06-15 05:34 a.m.
And were any further submissions of an attempted completion, submitted to you?
huddy.And were any further submissions of an attempted completion, submitted to you?
spedvictor 2025-06-15 05:34 a.m.
No
huddy. 2025-06-15 05:35 a.m.
Alright, let's turn towards your business.
huddy. 2025-06-15 05:35 a.m.@spedvictor Do you own a business?
huddy.spedvictor 2025-06-15 05:35 a.m.
Yes
spedvictorYes
huddy. 2025-06-15 05:35 a.m.
What is the registered title of your business?
huddy.What is the registered title of your business?
spedvictor 2025-06-15 05:35 a.m.
Ultimate Fighting of Columbia
spedvictorUltimate Fighting of Columbia
huddy. 2025-06-15 05:35 a.m.
What are the operations carried out in your business?
huddy.What are the operations carried out in your business?
spedvictor 2025-06-15 05:37 a.m.
It aims to bring and showcase top fighters on a platform where they can compete against each other to achieve feats and to win championships
spedvictorIt aims to bring and showcase top fighters on a platform where they can compete against each other to achieve feats and to win championships
huddy. 2025-06-15 05:37 a.m.
When was your business registered?
huddy.When was your business registered?
spedvictor 2025-06-15 05:39 a.m.
November 30th, 2024.
spedvictorNovember 30th, 2024.
huddy. 2025-06-15 05:51 a.m.
Is that the same or different date that you approached Kingley Napley?
huddy.Is that the same or different date that you approached Kingley Napley?
spedvictor 2025-06-15 05:52 a.m.
The same date
spedvictorThe same date
huddy. 2025-06-15 05:52 a.m.
Were these contracts important for the operation of your business?
huddy.Were these contracts important for the operation of your business?
spedvictor 2025-06-15 05:53 a.m.
Yes, they were required for my business to even be able to function
spedvictor 2025-06-15 05:54 a.m.
Without them I'm not able to operate my business
spedvictorWithout them I'm not able to operate my business
huddy. 2025-06-15 05:55 a.m.
How long did you wait for these contracts?
huddy.How long did you wait for these contracts?
spedvictor 2025-06-15 05:57 a.m.
I waited the entire time the retainer contract between me and Kingley Napely was active, which was a period of two months.
spedvictorI waited the entire time the retainer contract between me and Kingley Napely was active, which was a period of two months.
huddy. 2025-06-15 05:57 a.m.
Was your business able to operate at all during these two months?
huddy.Was your business able to operate at all during these two months?
spedvictor 2025-06-15 05:59 a.m.
No, and it's still not able to operate as I'm speaking.
spedvictorNo, and it's still not able to operate as I'm speaking.
huddy. 2025-06-15 06:00 a.m.
How many months have passed since you signed your retainer contract with Kingley Napely?
huddy.How many months have passed since you signed your retainer contract with Kingley Napely?
spedvictor 2025-06-15 06:03 a.m.
It's been over six months
spedvictorIt's been over six months
huddy. 2025-06-16 06:14 a.m.
Do you control the financial operations of your business?
huddy.Do you control the financial operations of your business?
spedvictor 2025-06-17 12:42 a.m.
Yes
spedvictorYes
huddy. 2025-06-17 08:21 a.m.
Do you produce financial monthly estimates for your business?
huddy.Do you produce financial monthly estimates for your business?
spedvictor 2025-06-18 04:12 a.m.
I've produced a financial estimate in the past before. But because my business has been inoperable for the past six and a half months, I haven't produced any since the initial one.
spedvictorI've produced a financial estimate in the past before. But because my business has been inoperable for the past six and a half months, I haven't produced any since the initial one.
huddy. 2025-06-18 06:48 a.m.
What were the results of your initial estimate?
huddy.What were the results of your initial estimate?
spedvictor 2025-06-19 08:59 a.m.
I estimated revenue ranging from $650,000 to $1,150,000 over a six week period
spedvictorI estimated revenue ranging from $650,000 to $1,150,000 over a six week period
Evexom 2025-06-19 11:49 a.m.
Objection, lack of foundation
@ryan
huddy. 2025-06-21 09:13 a.m.@ryan I have no words because I literally cannot get where they are coming from
huddy. 2025-06-21 09:13 a.m.
we urge the court to encourage fliply27 to expand further on his objection basis
ian 2025-06-21 09:14 a.m.
there is nothing else to be said
ian 2025-06-21 09:14 a.m.
that statement lacks foundation
ryan 2025-06-22 01:55 a.m.
Okay
ryan 2025-06-22 01:56 a.m.
I am going to overrule the objection, I believe that sufficient foundation exists prior in the line of questioning.
ryan 2025-06-22 01:56 a.m.
This is not the objection I'd use in this instance
ryan 2025-06-22 01:56 a.m.@ian @Evexom
huddy. 2025-06-23 04:07 a.m.@spedvictor How much money did you actually make in that six week period?
huddy.spedvictor 2025-06-23 04:10 a.m.
My business made $0.00
spedvictorMy business made $0.00
huddy. 2025-06-23 04:11 a.m.
Why was that?
huddy.Why was that?
spedvictor 2025-06-23 04:11 a.m.
Because business was and still is inoperable
spedvictor 2025-06-23 04:12 a.m.
Because my business*
spedvictorBecause business was and still is inoperable
huddy. 2025-06-23 04:12 a.m.
Why was it inoperable?
huddy.Why was it inoperable?
spedvictor 2025-06-23 04:14 a.m.
Because Kingley Napely didn't make any of the contracts that I needed for my business to be able to operate while the contract between me and them was active
ryan 2025-06-25 03:04 p.m.@huddy.
huddy. 2025-06-25 03:08 p.m.@ryan No further questions
huddy. 2025-06-25 03:08 p.m.
sorry for not letting you know earlier
huddy. 2025-06-25 03:08 p.m.
fun fact i was rowing and then there was a wasp underneath my boxers
ian 2025-06-25 03:09 p.m.@Evexom
huddy.fun fact i was rowing and then there was a wasp underneath my boxers
ryan 2025-06-25 03:09 p.m.
awesome
ryan 2025-06-25 03:09 p.m.
thanks for sharing
ryan 2025-06-25 03:09 p.m.
you get a gold star
ryan used /add
clerkFlow Bot2025-06-25 03:13 p.m. @ryan has added @Offer to the case channel.
Case Modified
huddy.fun fact i was rowing and then there was a wasp underneath my boxers
Offer 2025-06-25 03:18 p.m.
I don't think this is very appropriote to share, do not let me see you posting such foolery within the Judge's Chambers.
ryan 2025-06-25 03:18 p.m.
Thank you, this is why I hired you
Offer 2025-06-25 03:19 p.m.
No worries, Judge.
huddy. 2025-06-25 05:00 p.m.
LMFAO WHAT IS THIS
huddy. 2025-06-25 05:00 p.m.
IM SO SORRY BAILIFF SPOKESPERSON 
huddy.IM SO SORRY BAILIFF SPOKESPERSON
ryan 2025-06-25 05:58 p.m.
Do not diss the chamber ret*rd
huddy.IM SO SORRY BAILIFF SPOKESPERSON
Offer 2025-06-25 06:27 p.m.
Cease thine jests with me, forsooth, I am indeed of a band of ruffians.
Offer 2025-06-25 06:29 p.m.This tune was published in Thomas D'Urfey's Pills to Purge Melancholy (Originally in 1706). It appeared in The Recruiting Officer, a comedy by George Farquhar and in John Gay's The Beggar's Opera (1728). The lyrics refer to the War of the Spanish Succession (1701--1714), the Duke of Marlborough, and Queen Anne of England (1665 --1714).
The pain... 
The pain...
Offer 2025-06-25 06:30 p.m.
Moving on, please keep this chatroom to its original purpose, over the hills and far away.
Offer 2025-06-30 03:24 a.m.@huddy. Morning.
huddy. 2025-06-30 09:49 a.m.
sup
spedvictorBecause Kingley Napely didn't make any of the contracts that I needed for my business to be able to operate while the contract between me and them was active
ryan 2025-07-10 01:11 a.m.@ian @Evexom cross
huddy. 2025-07-12 05:08 a.m.@ryan It’s been 48 hours and no attempt to cross
huddy. 2025-07-12 05:09 a.m.
we move the court to take this as a waiver of cross
huddy. 2025-07-12 05:09 a.m.
and allow us to move to the next witnesss
huddy. 2025-07-12 05:10 a.m.
and zero attempt of communication with the court for example to request an extension or explain their absence, has been made
huddy.and allow us to move to the next witnesss
ryan 2025-07-12 10:31 a.m.
Sure
ryan 2025-07-22 02:17 a.m.
You have 24 hours before sanctions are instituted.
ian 2025-07-22 08:52 a.m.@ryan I have a new co counsel his name is tobyfartts4568
ian 2025-07-22 08:53 a.m.
Please add him @Toby
Evexom 2025-07-22 03:17 p.m.
i thought he was still tortfeasor
ian 2025-07-22 06:25 p.m.
tortfeasorfartts4568
Nicklaus 2025-07-22 07:29 p.m.
A stakeholder in Kingley Napley
ryan 2025-07-22 07:29 p.m.@Nicklaus It's your ass if he's added
Nicklaus 2025-07-22 07:29 p.m.
So sad
NicklausSo sad
ian 2025-07-22 07:40 p.m.
It isn't responding for me either
ian 2025-07-22 07:40 p.m.
Surely, it's down
ian 2025-07-22 07:40 p.m.
Bots never ignore me
ian 2025-07-22 07:40 p.m.
I'm the bot whisperer
ian 2025-07-22 07:41 p.m.
Thats my brother Timmy he is quite stupid they call him the dog whisperer
ian 2025-07-22 07:41 p.m.
I'm the bot whisperer
ian 2025-07-22 07:41 p.m.
Much smarter and intelligenter
ryan 2025-07-22 07:42 p.m.
sis stop with the fufu
ryansis stop with the fufu
ian 2025-07-22 07:43 p.m.
I've told all the bots to watch you closely because of this comment
ian 2025-07-22 07:43 p.m.
They will report back .
huddy. 2025-07-22 08:45 p.m.@ryan no further witnesses actually
ian 2025-07-22 08:50 p.m.@ryan my attorney isnt here
ian 2025-07-22 08:50 p.m.
I dont understand what is happening
ian 2025-07-22 08:50 p.m.
Im only an ordinary citizen I have no idea how courts wor
ian 2025-07-22 08:50 p.m.
please wait for him to be back Im supposed to have rights or something
ianryan 2025-07-22 08:51 p.m.
You may begin your presentation of evidence
ryanYou may begin your presentation of evidence
ian 2025-07-22 08:51 p.m.
what does this mean
ian 2025-07-22 08:51 p.m.@Toby what does this mean my lawyer pls help
ryan 2025-07-22 08:52 p.m.
Stop playing all the time
ryan 2025-07-22 08:52 p.m.
I will have jabronis invade my docket
ryan 2025-07-22 08:52 p.m.
not
ryan 2025-07-22 08:52 p.m.
Quit your jabronism this instant
Kezzera used /add
clerkFlow Bot2025-07-27 12:33 a.m. @Kezzera has added @ian to the case channel.
Case Modified
Kezzera 2025-08-04 03:32 a.m.
Case to be reassigned
Xerxy 2025-08-13 03:12 p.m.
Reassigned to mag @Ocazius
Xerxy used /add
clerkFlow Bot2025-08-13 03:18 p.m. @Xerxy has added @Ocazius to the case channel.
Case Modified
Ocazius 2025-08-13 03:18 p.m.
Alright
Ocazius 2025-08-13 03:19 p.m.@ian @Evexom @huddy. @spedvictor
Ocazius 2025-08-13 03:19 p.m.
Would I be correct in asserting that @Toby is no longer a defendant in this case?
Ocazius used /add
clerkFlow Bot2025-08-13 03:23 p.m. @Ocazius has added @Toby to the case channel.
Case Modified
Ocazius 2025-08-13 03:24 p.m.
I mean if you weren't in the case until I added you I don't know why you would still be a defendant
Ocazius 2025-08-13 03:24 p.m.
Can you answer @Toby ?
OcaziusI mean if you weren't in the case until I added you I don't know why you would still be a defendant
Toby 2025-08-13 03:24 p.m.
I'm not
Toby 2025-08-13 03:24 p.m.
I'm appearing as counsel for the Defendant
Ocazius 2025-08-13 03:25 p.m.
Alright, and is Fliply27 still cocounsel?
Toby 2025-08-13 03:25 p.m.@ian owns Clifford Chance (Kingley Napley) now
Toby 2025-08-13 03:25 p.m.
no
Ocazius used /remove
clerkFlow Bot2025-08-13 03:25 p.m. @Ocazius has removed @Evexom from the case channel.
Case Modified
Ocazius 2025-08-13 03:25 p.m.
Alright
Ocazius 2025-08-13 03:25 p.m.
So it seems that the previous judge has been catapulting this between questionings due to inactivity from counsels and witnesses
Toby 2025-08-13 03:25 p.m.
Due to the immense delays, can we have this dismissed without prejudice
Toby 2025-08-13 03:26 p.m.
this case hasnt had activity in weeks
Ocazius 2025-08-13 03:26 p.m.
No
Ocazius 2025-08-13 03:26 p.m.
There hasn't been an active Judge presiding over this
Ocazius 2025-08-13 03:26 p.m.
I think the clerk office forgot about HRR's cases
Toby 2025-08-13 03:26 p.m.
ok
Ocazius 2025-08-13 03:27 p.m.
I think we can all agree that this has been incredibly muddled with the extensive pretrial motion ping pong and then a bunch of different witness questionings
Ocazius 2025-08-13 03:27 p.m.
Do any counsel object to restarting this trial?
Ocazius 2025-08-13 03:27 p.m.@Toby @huddy.
Toby 2025-08-13 03:28 p.m.
no objection
huddy. 2025-08-13 03:32 p.m.
no objection
ian 2025-08-13 03:33 p.m.@Ocazius clifford chance is merging
ian 2025-08-13 03:33 p.m.
With another law firm
Ocazius 2025-08-13 03:33 p.m.
Good to know?
Ocazius 2025-08-13 03:35 p.m.
Alright I want this over quick, we aren't going to hop around for months.
When objections are issued by either party, questioning must cease until I rule on the objection. Each witness' questioning from a side will take place within a maximum of a 96 hour (four day) timeframe, unless I see that it is the witness who is delaying these proceedings.
When objections are issued by either party, questioning must cease until I rule on the objection. Each witness' questioning from a side will take place within a maximum of a 96 hour (four day) timeframe, unless I see that it is the witness who is delaying these proceedings.
Ocazius 2025-08-13 03:35 p.m.
No cross talking or arguing in absence of my presence.
Ocazius 2025-08-13 03:36 p.m.@huddy. @Toby Is this understood?
Toby 2025-08-13 03:37 p.m.
Yes
huddy. 2025-08-13 03:53 p.m.
Your Honor
huddy. 2025-08-13 03:53 p.m.
I am resigning as counsel
huddy. 2025-08-13 03:54 p.m.
I believe Xolaz is my replacement
Ocazius 2025-08-13 03:56 p.m.@spedvictor Can you confirm this?
Ocazius used /add
clerkFlow Bot2025-08-13 03:57 p.m. @Ocazius has added @k to the case channel.
Case Modified
Ocazius used /remove
clerkFlow Bot2025-08-13 03:57 p.m. @Ocazius has removed @huddy. from the case channel.
Case Modified
Ocaziusspedvictor 2025-08-13 03:57 p.m.@k is my lawyer
k 2025-08-13 03:57 p.m.
Hi all
Ocazius 2025-08-13 03:57 p.m.
Wonderful
k 2025-08-13 03:57 p.m.
from my recent readings we are restarting trial?
OcaziusAlright I want this over quick, we aren't going to hop around for months. When objections are issued by either party, questioning must cease until I rule on the objection. Each w...
Ocazius 2025-08-13 03:57 p.m.@k Read and respond with 'Understood'
Ocazius 2025-08-13 03:57 p.m.
Correct
k 2025-08-13 03:58 p.m.
4 days works for me!
Ocazius 2025-08-13 03:58 p.m.
I don't care
k 2025-08-13 03:58 p.m.
Understood
Ocazius 2025-08-13 03:58 p.m.@k 12 hours for your opening statement.
k 2025-08-13 03:58 p.m.
Sounds good. We'll present it today
k 2025-08-13 11:23 p.m.
Good evening your honor, we the plaintiff bring forth a contract case, a very straightforward agreement by two parties, that was paid IN FULL, that was never HONORED by the defendant.
On November 30th, 2024, my client, kingvictor1000, had looked-for representation from Kingley Napley. One of the more sizable law firms in the State of Mayflower. The goal my client had set in place was very simple, to secure legal representation for a certain amount of time to launch his business, the Columbia Fighting Championship. The terms that were set in the agreement between my client and Kingley Napley were very clear, administrative legal work, court representation and legal advice, all for the retaining price of $50,000. Which my client paid in full.
From the first day of the agreement between my client and the defendant, my client upheld his end of the agreement to the fullest. However, the defendant did not uphold their conditions of the agreement whatsoever. Three weeks after payment from my client, of $50,000 dollars, putting the retainer into effect, my client was waiting for over three weeks for contracts, he was given a singular, generic fighter contract template. When my client requested five fighter contracts tailored with specific details, he was met with silence from Kingley Napley, despite being a client on their retainer. That silence would go for an entire month. An ENTIRE month! Despite being a PAYING client!(edited)
On November 30th, 2024, my client, kingvictor1000, had looked-for representation from Kingley Napley. One of the more sizable law firms in the State of Mayflower. The goal my client had set in place was very simple, to secure legal representation for a certain amount of time to launch his business, the Columbia Fighting Championship. The terms that were set in the agreement between my client and Kingley Napley were very clear, administrative legal work, court representation and legal advice, all for the retaining price of $50,000. Which my client paid in full.
From the first day of the agreement between my client and the defendant, my client upheld his end of the agreement to the fullest. However, the defendant did not uphold their conditions of the agreement whatsoever. Three weeks after payment from my client, of $50,000 dollars, putting the retainer into effect, my client was waiting for over three weeks for contracts, he was given a singular, generic fighter contract template. When my client requested five fighter contracts tailored with specific details, he was met with silence from Kingley Napley, despite being a client on their retainer. That silence would go for an entire month. An ENTIRE month! Despite being a PAYING client!(edited)
k 2025-08-13 11:23 p.m.
Your Honor, the evidence we will present to you will prove that the actions by Kingley Napley were nothing short of a breach of contract, a breach of duty of care, and a clear act of negligence. A law firm failing to meet even the most BASIC necessities a client requests, is utterly unprofessional and unreasonable. As a result of the defendant’s actions, my client’s business launch stalled completely, costing him an estimated $650,000 to $1,150,000 in lost revenue.
Four points I will make throughout this trial, is that
A VALID, ENFORCEABLE contract existed between my client and the defendant.
My client upheld his obligations as written as such in the agreement.
The defendant failed to perform their duties, breaching both contract and duty of care.
This unethical failure by the defendant caused detrimental financial harm.
This is not a case of a minor delay or some large request sent to one of the bigger law firms in the State of Mayflower, this is a case of simple requests, where my client put his hardworking money into a law firm, a law firm he thought was reputable. What did he walk away with? Virtually NOTHING.
At the end of this trial, we ask the court to hold the defendant accountable, not only to my client, but to send a message that neglect is not something a person seeking legal representation should have to deal with.
We the plaintiff, put our trust in you, your honor.
Thank you.
Four points I will make throughout this trial, is that
A VALID, ENFORCEABLE contract existed between my client and the defendant.
My client upheld his obligations as written as such in the agreement.
The defendant failed to perform their duties, breaching both contract and duty of care.
This unethical failure by the defendant caused detrimental financial harm.
This is not a case of a minor delay or some large request sent to one of the bigger law firms in the State of Mayflower, this is a case of simple requests, where my client put his hardworking money into a law firm, a law firm he thought was reputable. What did he walk away with? Virtually NOTHING.
At the end of this trial, we ask the court to hold the defendant accountable, not only to my client, but to send a message that neglect is not something a person seeking legal representation should have to deal with.
We the plaintiff, put our trust in you, your honor.
Thank you.
k 2025-08-13 11:23 p.m.@Ocazius
Ocazius 2025-08-14 04:29 a.m.
Thank you. @Toby Opening Statement please.
Ocazius used /timer
clerkFlow Bot2025-08-14 05:19 a.m. Thursday, August 14, 2025 at 5:19 p.m. (6 months ago )
Timer
Toby 2025-08-14 02:27 p.m.@Ocazius We reserve our opening statement.
Toby 2025-08-14 02:28 p.m.@k Can I just ask if you're using the same discovery materials James submitted?
k 2025-08-14 02:31 p.m.
correct
Toby 2025-08-14 02:35 p.m.
ok
TobyOcazius 2025-08-14 02:43 p.m.
How kind of you to inform the court 9 hours later
Ocazius 2025-08-14 02:44 p.m.@k Call your first witness please.
OcaziusHow kind of you to inform the court 9 hours later
Toby 2025-08-14 02:44 p.m.
Kinda forgot
Toby 2025-08-14 02:44 p.m.
my bad
Ocazius 2025-08-14 02:45 p.m.
That's fine
Ocazius 2025-08-14 02:45 p.m.@k Who will you be calling?
Ocazius 2025-08-14 02:58 p.m.
By the way, both of you provide me your timezones please, so I can understand when to expect inactivity.
Ocaziusk 2025-08-14 03:31 p.m.
lets start with tobyrulles4568 your honor
Ocazius 2025-08-14 03:36 p.m.@Toby
Ocazius used /administeroath
clerkFlow Bot2025-08-14 03:36 p.m.@Toby (edited)Which type of oath would you like to swear to?
Religious - Involves swearing to god that your testimony is, or will be, truthful.
Non-Religious - Solemnly affirms that your testimony is, or will be, truthful, under the pains and penalties of perjury. Religious Oath Non-Religious Oath
Oath Selection
BotclerkFlowclerkFlow Bot2025-08-14 03:36 p.m.@Toby Do you solemnly affirm that you will tell the truth, the whole truth, under the pains and penalties of perjury?
Non-Religious Oath
Toby 2025-08-14 03:37 p.m.
I do
OcaziusBy the way, both of you provide me your timezones please, so I can understand when to expect inactivity.
Toby 2025-08-14 03:37 p.m.
BST
Ocazius 2025-08-14 03:39 p.m.@k All yours.
Ocazius 2025-08-14 03:39 p.m.
Note: The witness on the stand may raise objections.
OcaziusBy the way, both of you provide me your timezones please, so I can understand when to expect inactivity.
k 2025-08-14 03:43 p.m.
CST
k 2025-08-14 03:43 p.m.@Toby Good evening
Toby 2025-08-14 03:43 p.m.
Oh god
Toby 2025-08-14 03:43 p.m.
I forgot I was a witness in this
Toby 2025-08-14 03:44 p.m.@Ocazius In order to abide by my ethical obligations, I will be withdrawing as counsel. @ian will still be able to represent the Defendant seeing as he is the legal owner of Clifford Chance (formally Kingley Napley)
Toby 2025-08-14 03:45 p.m.
So nothing materially has changed with the trial
k 2025-08-14 03:45 p.m.@Toby are you a state resident?
kToby 2025-08-14 03:45 p.m.
Yes
k 2025-08-14 03:47 p.m.
are you currently bar certified in the state of mayflower?
k 2025-08-14 03:48 p.m.@Toby
kare you currently bar certified in the state of mayflower?
Toby 2025-08-14 03:49 p.m.
I am yeah
Toby 2025-08-14 03:49 p.m.
(please ping me with each question, I wont be looking)
k 2025-08-14 03:49 p.m.
are you actively practicing law?
Toby 2025-08-14 03:49 p.m.
To some degree
k 2025-08-14 03:49 p.m.
how long have you been practicing law?
khow long have you been practicing law?
Toby 2025-08-14 03:50 p.m.
As a whole across other ro-states or in Clark?(edited)
k 2025-08-14 03:50 p.m.
let me rephrase
k 2025-08-14 03:50 p.m.
how long have you been practicing law in the state of mayflower?
Toby 2025-08-14 03:50 p.m.
Erm
Toby 2025-08-14 03:51 p.m.
September maybe, do you want me to check the bar database(edited)
k 2025-08-14 03:51 p.m.@Ocazius your honor will you allow me to present the state bar database?
k 2025-08-14 03:51 p.m.
its already authenticated material
Ocazius 2025-08-14 03:52 p.m.
Yes but ensure a full screenshot of the screen so that I can see the link, because the state bar database is a copiable google sheet
Ocazius 2025-08-14 03:52 p.m.
cc @k
k 2025-08-14 03:52 p.m. 
Toby 2025-08-14 03:53 p.m.
Ok yeah then from last September
k 2025-08-14 03:53 p.m.
for the record the witness has been bar certified since september 16th
k 2025-08-14 03:54 p.m.@Toby while maintaining your bar license, have you ever worked for a law firm?
k 2025-08-14 03:54 p.m.
in the state of mayflower
kToby 2025-08-14 03:55 p.m.
I've owned one, so I suppose so
k 2025-08-14 03:55 p.m.
can I have a yes or no response to the question please?
Toby 2025-08-14 03:55 p.m.
yes
Tobyyes
k 2025-08-14 03:55 p.m.
yes you have worked for a law firm in the state of mayflower?
k 2025-08-14 03:55 p.m.
or were you responding to my question of asking for a yes/no
k 2025-08-14 03:56 p.m.@Toby
kyes you have worked for a law firm in the state of mayflower?
Toby 2025-08-14 03:57 p.m.
Yes
k 2025-08-14 03:57 p.m.
ok.
k 2025-08-14 03:57 p.m.
which law firm?
Toby 2025-08-14 03:57 p.m.
I owned Kingley Napley
k 2025-08-14 03:57 p.m.
you owned kingley napley.
k 2025-08-14 03:57 p.m.
what was your official position in kingley napley?
Toby 2025-08-14 03:57 p.m.
Managing Partner
k 2025-08-14 03:58 p.m.
what are the duties of a "managing partner"?
Toby 2025-08-14 03:58 p.m.
To manage the firms overall business and conduct hirings
k 2025-08-14 04:00 p.m.
okay.
k 2025-08-14 04:00 p.m.
were there other managing partners?
Ocazius 2025-08-14 04:01 p.m.
Get into the habit of pinging him every question, as he requested.
Ocazius 2025-08-14 04:01 p.m.@k
kwere there other managing partners?
k 2025-08-14 04:03 p.m.
rephrasing
k 2025-08-14 04:03 p.m.
were there other managing partners in your firm? @Toby
kwere there other managing partners in your firm? @Toby
Toby 2025-08-14 04:09 p.m.
No just one
k 2025-08-14 04:29 p.m.@Toby was there a kingley napley discord server?
Ocazius 2025-08-14 05:45 p.m.Note:
Due to the fact that this case has been going on for 5 months and 11 days and that we are only just beginning the official trial, witnesses who do not respond to a question within18 hours will be sanctioned (unless a valid excuse is provided).
Due to the fact that this case has been going on for 5 months and 11 days and that we are only just beginning the official trial, witnesses who do not respond to a question within
Ocazius pinned a message to this channel.2026-01-18 03:00 p.m.
Ocazius 2025-08-14 05:46 p.m.
I will reduce that to 12 hours if it gets out of hand, as the previous Judge did.
OcaziusI will reduce that to 12 hours if it gets out of hand, as the previous Judge did.
Toby 2025-08-14 07:35 p.m.
Please be aware of times when we're asleep
kToby 2025-08-14 07:35 p.m.
Yes
TobyYes
k 2025-08-14 08:31 p.m.
what system do you have setup that allows you to communicate to current, upcoming clients?
kwhat system do you have setup that allows you to communicate to current, upcoming clients?
Toby 2025-08-14 08:41 p.m.
We dont have any current system as I no longer own the firm
TobyWe dont have any current system as I no longer own the firm
k 2025-08-14 08:46 p.m.
How long did you own your firm? @Toby
kHow long did you own your firm? @Toby
Toby 2025-08-14 08:47 p.m.
I dont know off the top of my head
k 2025-08-14 08:47 p.m.
from the first day to when you let go of the company
Toby 2025-08-14 08:47 p.m.
I genuinely dont know
k 2025-08-14 08:47 p.m.
you dont know how long you owned your own company for?
k 2025-08-14 08:52 p.m.@Toby well here, let me narrow this down
k 2025-08-14 08:52 p.m.
did you own your law firm before and after 11/30/2024?
kdid you own your law firm before and after 11/30/2024?
Toby 2025-08-14 09:00 p.m.
I dont know
Toby 2025-08-14 09:00 p.m.
Im not being obstructive, I genuinely do not know the time frame
k 2025-08-14 09:01 p.m.
how do you not know? you were the managing partner for one of the biggest law firms in mayflower
k 2025-08-14 09:01 p.m.
and owned it
Ocazius 2025-08-14 09:11 p.m.@Toby Please utilize any verifiable resources available to you to check and competently answer the question.
Ocazius 2025-08-14 09:11 p.m.
I instruct/allow you to do so.
Ocazius 2025-08-14 09:12 p.m.
It really takes less than a minute.
Toby 2025-08-14 09:12 p.m.
Ok
Toby 2025-08-14 09:12 p.m.
I believe from about October time to about may
Toby 2025-08-14 09:12 p.m.
Not 100% sure
Toby 2025-08-14 09:12 p.m.
There's no sure way to verify 100%
Ocazius 2025-08-14 09:13 p.m.@k That's a reasonable answer, please move on from dwelling on this (you can establish ownership on dates through your exhibits when you introduce them later).
k 2025-08-15 12:09 a.m.@Toby While you said you didn't have a 'current' system, what was the system you WERE using around november 30th, 2024?
kk 2025-08-15 12:09 a.m.
The system, how clients would contact you and future clients would ask for representation
kToby 2025-08-15 06:42 a.m.
A ticket system
TobyA ticket system
k 2025-08-15 03:40 p.m.
Can you describe how the ticket system functioned for client requests and client communication? @Toby
kCan you describe how the ticket system functioned for client requests and client communication? @Toby
Toby 2025-08-15 05:15 p.m.
If a client wanted to use our services, they'd click a button in a channel called "consultations" whereby clicking on the button would open a ticket channel where they could talk to us privately about using our services.
k 2025-08-15 05:48 p.m.
Who monitored the ‘consultations’ channel for new ticket requests? @Toby
kWho monitored the ‘consultations’ channel for new ticket requests? @Toby
k 2025-08-15 05:48 p.m.
*'consultations' category
kWho monitored the ‘consultations’ channel for new ticket requests? @Toby
Toby 2025-08-15 05:58 p.m.
Pretty much everyone who worked at the firm
k 2025-08-15 05:59 p.m.@Toby Were staff members assigned to specific tickets?
kToby 2025-08-15 06:27 p.m.
They were either assigned or they took their own initiative to assign themselves.
TobyThey were either assigned or they took their own initiative to assign themselves.
k 2025-08-15 06:35 p.m.
If no one assigned themselves to a ticket, what would happen to it?
kIf no one assigned themselves to a ticket, what would happen to it?
Toby 2025-08-15 06:51 p.m.
I'd assign an attorney to it
k 2025-08-15 06:59 p.m.
When you say you would assign an attorney, how would you decide who to assign?
kWhen you say you would assign an attorney, how would you decide who to assign?
Toby 2025-08-16 07:47 a.m.
Id assign based on who had the expertise if required or who had the lowest case load
Ocazius 2025-08-16 06:42 p.m.@k
Ocaziusk 2025-08-16 06:44 p.m.
sorry he responded very early and i haven’t been home
k 2025-08-16 06:44 p.m.
will ask now
Ocazius 2025-08-16 06:44 p.m.
Don't apologise, was just reminding you.
ian 2025-08-16 11:10 p.m.
wait lowk
ian 2025-08-16 11:10 p.m.
if toby is testifying
ian 2025-08-16 11:10 p.m.@Ocazius
ian 2025-08-16 11:10 p.m.
who is my lawyer
ian 2025-08-16 11:10 p.m.
LOL
ian 2025-08-16 11:10 p.m.
Fliply withdrew
ian 2025-08-16 11:10 p.m.
does clifford chance just. not have a lawyer
Tobyian 2025-08-16 11:11 p.m.
I see
ian 2025-08-16 11:11 p.m.
uhh
ian 2025-08-16 11:11 p.m.@Ocazius we've kind of
ian 2025-08-16 11:11 p.m.
Clfiford chance has merged with hamilton & wexler to make clerion legal
ian 2025-08-16 11:11 p.m.
I'm not sure if you'd care about that
ian 2025-08-16 11:11 p.m.
or what exactly happens
ian 2025-08-16 11:11 p.m.
ig I'm repping clerion? uhh
ian 2025-08-16 11:12 p.m.
I'm not part of clerion anymore ...
ian 2025-08-16 11:12 p.m.
can we take a moment to pause and see what we're gonna do about this bc it's late for me but this makes no sense
TobyI'd assign an attorney to it
k 2025-08-17 02:15 p.m.
do you know who kingvictor1000 is?
Ocazius 2025-08-17 02:29 p.m.@ian
Ocazius 2025-08-17 02:29 p.m.
This will continue
Ocazius 2025-08-17 02:29 p.m.
once I speak to Singhski
Ocazius 2025-08-17 02:29 p.m.
as he is the presiding DC Judge
kdo you know who kingvictor1000 is?
Toby 2025-08-17 02:51 p.m.
Yes
OcaziusThis will continue
k 2025-08-17 03:01 p.m.
your honor the defense has had ample time to gather counsel
k 2025-08-17 03:01 p.m.
any delay now would just be ridiculous
kyour honor the defense has had ample time to gather counsel
Ocazius 2025-08-17 03:07 p.m.
It’s not regarding that
Ocazius 2025-08-17 03:07 p.m.
It’s regarding the fact that Kingley Napley/Clifford Chance doesn’t exist
Ocazius 2025-08-17 03:07 p.m.
Obviously the trial will continue but I need confirmation from Singhski on who will be the rep
Ocazius 2025-08-17 03:08 p.m.
Robert or Npz
Ocazius 2025-08-17 03:10 p.m.@ian Would you be willing to forward me the merger document?
Ocaziusian 2025-08-17 03:21 p.m.
I'd rather not
ian 2025-08-17 03:21 p.m.
I do think Robert should be the rep though because he is now the principal managing partner at Clerion legal
ian 2025-08-17 03:21 p.m.
so it makes sense
ian 2025-08-17 03:21 p.m.
I retain partial ownership but don't actually work there at the moment
ian 2025-08-17 03:22 p.m.
if you need a paper trail that Clerion legal exists you can check the DOS database
ianI do think Robert should be the rep though because he is now the principal managing partner at Clerion legal
Ocazius 2025-08-17 03:46 p.m.
I understand that, but I wanted to review the contract to see if perhaps there were any clauses regarding you maintianing management of a special clifford division or something
Ocazius 2025-08-17 03:46 p.m.
But I do agree that Robert should be the new defendant
Ocazius 2025-08-17 03:46 p.m.
I have contacted the Judge and I will await his approval
OcaziusI understand that, but I wanted to review the contract to see if perhaps there were any clauses regarding you maintianing management of a special clifford division or something
ian 2025-08-17 03:46 p.m.
nah
OcaziusIt’s regarding the fact that Kingley Napley/Clifford Chance doesn’t exist
k 2025-08-17 04:24 p.m.
pretty sure there would be successor liability
Ocazius 2025-08-17 05:14 p.m.
Agreed, hence why I recommended Bob.
Ocazius 2025-08-18 08:58 a.m.@robert
Ocazius 2025-08-18 09:00 a.m.
Under the de facto merger doctrine (a transaction effectively merges two companies, resulting in the successor assuming the liabilities of the predecessor) and the fact that you failed to include a clause stating otherwise in your merger contract, you are now the defendant representative in this case.
Ocazius used /add
clerkFlow Bot2025-08-18 09:00 a.m. @Ocazius has added @robert to the case channel.
Case Modified
Ocazius 2025-08-18 09:04 a.m.@robert
OcaziusUnder the de facto merger doctrine (a transaction effectively merges two companies, resulting in the successor assuming the liabilities of the predecessor) and the fact that you fa...
robert 2025-08-18 09:08 a.m.
Your Honor, respectuflly have you actually seen the contract when you made this statement?
robertYour Honor, respectuflly have you actually seen the contract when you made this statement?
Ocazius 2025-08-18 09:12 a.m.
No. I specifically asked the managing partner of the merged firm, npz_v, to forward me a copy of the merger document so that I may review the terms and assess whether anything included contradicts the de facto merger doctrine. However, he informed me that he was not willing to do so and failed to provide any information backing up an argument that there would be anything contradicting successor liability.
OcaziusNo. I specifically asked the managing partner of the merged firm, npz_v, to forward me a copy of the merger document so that I may review the terms and assess whether anything incl...
robert 2025-08-18 09:12 a.m.
understood
Ocazius 2025-08-18 09:12 a.m.
Would you be willing to provide me the document or notify me of any clauses?
OcaziusWould you be willing to provide me the document or notify me of any clauses?
robert 2025-08-18 09:13 a.m.
in that case i request an in camera review of the merger agreement, as it contains sensitive governance and financial details not relevant beyond the liability allocation clause
Ocazius 2025-08-18 09:13 a.m.
You mean a voice call screen share?
robert 2025-08-18 09:13 a.m.
whatever you'd prefer
Ocazius 2025-08-18 09:13 a.m.
What's an in camera review
robert 2025-08-18 09:14 a.m.
in camera is a latin legal phrase that literally means “in chambers” or “in private.”
robert 2025-08-18 09:14 a.m.
usually in this case, dms probably?
robertin camera is a latin legal phrase that literally means “in chambers” or “in private.”
Ocazius 2025-08-18 09:14 a.m.
Yes but I mean what is this in the functionality of roblox and discord
robertusually in this case, dms probably?
Ocazius 2025-08-18 09:14 a.m.
I don't think that would be appropiate
Ocazius 2025-08-18 09:14 a.m.
I have an idea - I will create a private channel
Ocazius 2025-08-18 09:14 a.m.
However all clerks would still have access
robert 2025-08-18 09:15 a.m.
just means you personally review the document privately, rather than in open court, so that sensitive information isn’t unnecessarily disclosed
robert 2025-08-18 09:15 a.m.
sure no objections from me
robertjust means you personally review the document privately, rather than in open court, so that sensitive information isn’t unnecessarily disclosed
Ocazius 2025-08-18 09:15 a.m.
I understand that, my confusion is in terms of application to discord
Ocazius 2025-08-18 09:15 a.m.
Actually, I will allow you to personally forward me the document in my direct messages.
Ocazius 2025-08-18 09:16 a.m.
Do you agree to that @robert ?
OcaziusDo you agree to that @robert ?
robert 2025-08-18 09:16 a.m.
Sure, as long as it's not disclosed in an open corut
robert 2025-08-18 09:16 a.m.
court*
Ocazius 2025-08-18 09:16 a.m.
of course.
Ocaziusof course.
robert 2025-08-18 09:18 a.m.
accodingly, I ask the court to recognise that Clerion Legal, and I as its current managing partner, should not be designated the defendant for pre-closing liabilities
Ocazius 2025-08-18 09:20 a.m.
Disclosure
Ocazius 2025-08-18 09:21 a.m.@ian I am disappointed in you.
Ocazius 2025-08-18 09:21 a.m.
Either you didn't read your own merger contract in which you signed your own company away, or you knowingly concealed the truth to this court.
robert 2025-08-18 09:22 a.m.
I'm sure he didn't mean it, Your Honor. Mistakes do happen.
Ocazius 2025-08-18 09:22 a.m.
I note that there is a literal entire section on liabilities, in which it is stated in a clear subsection clause that "Pre-Closing liabilities remain the responsibility of the originating Party unless assumed in a signed amendment."
Ocazius 2025-08-18 09:25 a.m.
I will not be holding you in contempt, however I would like it noted and branded in your brain that I am disappointed.
Ocazius used /remove
clerkFlow Bot2025-08-18 09:25 a.m. @Ocazius has removed @robert from the case channel.
Case Modified
Ocazius 2025-08-18 09:25 a.m.
Thank you for your confirmation and assistance Mr. Sabbatini.
TobyYes
Ocazius 2025-08-18 09:25 a.m.@k Continue your questioning.
k 2025-08-18 09:33 a.m.
after school
Ocazius 2025-08-18 09:33 a.m.
ok
OcaziusI understand that, my confusion is in terms of application to discord
ian 2025-08-18 10:14 a.m.
Most judges make a thread
OcaziusEither you didn't read your own merger contract in which you signed your own company away, or you knowingly concealed the truth to this court.
ian 2025-08-18 10:21 a.m.
No I read it but I just didn't remember it
ian 2025-08-18 10:22 a.m.
At the time I reviewed several documents a day from my subordinates to ensure they were up to our standards, and logically forgot them after that because it served no purpose to remember them
ian 2025-08-18 10:23 a.m.
The contract was something like that, I read it initially to ensure everything was okay and when I saw it was I said it and then eventually forgot it
ian 2025-08-18 10:23 a.m.
I thought I was most likely not going to have to use it because I was leaving for public service for a considerable time
ian 2025-08-18 10:24 a.m.
I forgot to take into account this case though, which you'll have to forgive me for because it started when I wasn't even a lawyer and has kind of just been going on in the background for ages
TobyId assign based on who had the expertise if required or who had the lowest case load
k 2025-08-18 11:47 p.m.
+backtracking -
k 2025-08-18 11:47 p.m.
Did you have a time limit set by which attorney had to be assigned? @Toby
kDid you have a time limit set by which attorney had to be assigned? @Toby
ian 2025-08-19 01:22 a.m.
Objection lack of foundation
ian 2025-08-19 01:24 a.m.
You're implying time limits are commonly used and the absence thereof constitutes recklessness, but you have yet to establish that common practice actually exists
k 2025-08-19 01:24 a.m.
what..?
kwhat..?
ian 2025-08-19 01:24 a.m.
You heard me
k 2025-08-19 01:25 a.m.
im just trying to comprehend this objection
k 2025-08-19 01:25 a.m.
lack of foundation..?
ian 2025-08-19 01:25 a.m.
I explained it
ian 2025-08-19 01:25 a.m.
I think I explained myself well
ian 2025-08-19 01:25 a.m.
I'm going to sleep
k 2025-08-19 01:25 a.m.
please go to sleep and think about it
k 2025-08-19 01:26 a.m.
ill let the judge rule i wont even respond to this
ian 2025-08-19 01:27 a.m.
Uhm
ian 2025-08-19 01:27 a.m.
I sure love ad hominem dismissives bro
ian 2025-08-19 01:28 a.m.
Me too
ian 2025-08-19 01:28 a.m.
Very honest and intellectual way to represent a client's stance in court buddy
ian 2025-08-19 01:29 a.m.
Instead of addressing the very obviously well-placed objection
ian 2025-08-19 01:29 a.m.@Ocazius Im going to sleep please rule on the objection
ian 2025-08-19 01:31 a.m.
More ad hominem dismissives
ian 2025-08-19 01:31 a.m.
Left and right
ian 2025-08-19 01:31 a.m.
You may have a problem dude
Ocazius 2025-08-19 05:10 a.m.
I was asleep, apologies for the wait.
ianObjection lack of foundation
Ocazius 2025-08-19 05:12 a.m.
Overruled….
kDid you have a time limit set by which attorney had to be assigned? @Toby
Ocazius 2025-08-19 05:12 a.m.@Toby Answer the question
OcaziusOverruled….
ian 2025-08-19 06:15 a.m.
Where's the foundation
ian 2025-08-19 06:16 a.m.
He's trying to establish that we engaged in a pattern of negligence by asking whether we did certain things without telling the court whether any other person does those things
ian 2025-08-19 06:16 a.m.
That's a textbook lack of foundation objection
ian 2025-08-19 06:18 a.m.
If you sue somebody for negligence obviously you could not just go to trial and, there, ask the person "did you have a time limit on my ticket", because it'll mean nothing if they answer no—you haven't established that it does
ian 2025-08-19 06:22 a.m.
I urge the court to reconsider
Ocazius 2025-08-19 07:23 a.m.
This is a bench trial, there is no jury to be misled here. I’ll give the testimony only whatever weight it deserves in light of whether a foundation is later established, which I urge you to do so soon @k .
Ocazius 2025-08-19 07:24 a.m.
The court awaits tobyrulles4568's response to the question.
OcaziusThis is a bench trial, there is no jury to be misled here. I’ll give the testimony only whatever weight it deserves in light of whether a foundation is later established, which I u...
ian 2025-08-19 08:46 a.m.
I doubt he will establish a foundation
ian 2025-08-19 08:46 a.m.
Because there isn't anything in discovery that could be used to do so
ian 2025-08-19 08:46 a.m.
So I believe the question to be inappropriate
Ocazius 2025-08-19 08:52 a.m.
I don't care what you doubt
Ocazius 2025-08-19 08:52 a.m.
Unless you doubt that you should be interrupting examination
Ocazius 2025-08-19 08:52 a.m.
In which case you'd be correct.
TobyYes
k 2025-08-19 04:46 p.m.
Who is he? @Toby
k 2025-08-19 04:46 p.m.
how do you know who he is.
khow do you know who he is.
Toby 2025-08-19 05:01 p.m.
Because hes the plaintiff in this case(edited)
TobyBecause hes the plaintiff in this case(edited)
k 2025-08-19 05:13 p.m.
To your knowledge, Was kingvictor1000 ever a client for your law firm that you owned? @Toby
kTo your knowledge, Was kingvictor1000 ever a client for your law firm that you owned? @Toby
Toby 2025-08-19 05:14 p.m.
Yes
ian 2025-08-19 07:47 p.m.@Ocazius witness replied a minute later but counsel ceased asking questions
ian 2025-08-19 07:47 p.m.
can we continue
ian 2025-08-19 07:47 p.m.@k
k 2025-08-19 09:35 p.m.
yea it'll continue once i ask the question
TobyYes
k 2025-08-19 09:36 p.m.
To your knowledge, did kingvictor1000 open a ticket in your law firm requesting legal services?
kyea it'll continue once i ask the question
ian 2025-08-19 10:28 p.m.
Really
ian 2025-08-19 10:28 p.m.
You learn something new everyday
ianYou learn something new everyday
Ocazius 2025-08-20 05:12 a.m.
You’re going to stop being so sarcastic especially during other people’s examination
Ocazius 2025-08-20 05:12 a.m.
It’s mildly irritating
Ocazius 2025-08-20 05:12 a.m.
And I typically wish to maintain a state of inert coolness.
ian 2025-08-20 06:17 a.m.
I replied with sarcasm to plaintiff counsel's original sarcastic comment
ianI replied with sarcasm to plaintiff counsel's original sarcastic comment
Ocazius 2025-08-20 06:23 a.m.
Don’t make me send a GIF.
Ocazius 2025-08-20 06:24 a.m.
Now hush up for examination unless you have an objection.
kTo your knowledge, did kingvictor1000 open a ticket in your law firm requesting legal services?
Toby 2025-08-21 06:37 p.m.
Its possible
ian 2025-08-21 06:39 p.m.@k are you recusing
ian 2025-08-21 06:39 p.m.
I assume you are because DOJ internally prohibits outside practice in a document they make quite public
ian 2025-08-21 06:40 p.m.
Assuming you did get permission to go around that, because it'd be a violation if you hadn't, it would be wise for your honor @Ocazius to require that the plaintiff's attorney certify he informed his client
ian 2025-08-21 06:40 p.m.
because this seems like quite a conflict of interest and your client is entitled to know
k 2025-08-21 06:41 p.m.
doj policies have no bearing on this court
k 2025-08-21 06:42 p.m.
and i am grandfathered so i do have permission
kdoj policies have no bearing on this court
ian 2025-08-21 06:42 p.m.
ethical policies do
ian 2025-08-21 06:42 p.m.
which is why I didnt ask the court to require you certify on DOJ policies
k 2025-08-21 06:42 p.m.
if you have a concern, please submit a doj report 
ian 2025-08-21 06:42 p.m.
I asked it certify on your ethical policies to inform your client
kif you have a concern, please submit a doj report
ian 2025-08-21 06:42 p.m.
again that's not what I am
ian 2025-08-21 06:42 p.m.
talking about
ian 2025-08-21 06:42 p.m.
are we fr
ian 2025-08-21 06:43 p.m.
did you tell your client that you are in violation of your DOJ policies and that engaging in private practice could create a conflict of interest for him
ian 2025-08-21 06:43 p.m.
and, knowing this, did he waive any such conflict
k 2025-08-21 06:43 p.m.
I am not in violation of doj ethics
k 2025-08-21 06:43 p.m.
why are you so worried if you have an issue make a motion big dog
k 2025-08-21 06:43 p.m.
theres also a doj report tipline
ian 2025-08-21 06:43 p.m.
this is the third time Im telling you that Im not talking about DOJ
ian 2025-08-21 06:43 p.m.
handbook
k 2025-08-21 06:43 p.m. 
ian 2025-08-21 06:43 p.m.
Im talking about your ethical, professional requirements
ian 2025-08-21 06:44 p.m.
as an attorney
kClick to see attachment.
ian 2025-08-21 06:44 p.m. 
ian 2025-08-21 06:44 p.m.
reading is essential
ian 2025-08-21 06:44 p.m.
since you clearly must I implore you to re-read
k 2025-08-21 06:44 p.m.
in violation of your doj policies
k 2025-08-21 06:44 p.m.
are you like?
ian 2025-08-21 06:44 p.m.
yes
ian 2025-08-21 06:44 p.m.
Im not asking the court to verify you arent violating DOJ policies
ian 2025-08-21 06:44 p.m.
like I said, now, 4 times
k 2025-08-21 06:44 p.m.
there is no conflict of interest
ian 2025-08-21 06:44 p.m.
Im asking it to verify that you completed your ETHICAL AND PROFESSIONAL DUTY, as an ATTORNEY , to inform your client
k 2025-08-21 06:44 p.m.
have an issue? make a motion
k 2025-08-21 06:45 p.m.
or contact the judge
ian 2025-08-21 06:45 p.m.
I am contacting the judge
ian 2025-08-21 06:45 p.m.
did you not see me ping him
k 2025-08-21 06:45 p.m.
why are you so mad all the time
k 2025-08-21 06:45 p.m.
good for you bd
ian 2025-08-21 06:45 p.m.
Im easily ragebaited
ian 2025-08-21 06:45 p.m.
Im working on it
k 2025-08-21 06:45 p.m.
something is clearly wrong up there
k 2025-08-21 06:45 p.m.
ill be asking my questions, done talking to you, any issues make a motion
ian 2025-08-21 06:46 p.m.
uhm
ian 2025-08-21 06:46 p.m.@Ocazius
Ocazius 2025-08-22 06:22 a.m.@ian It is not the court's duty to affirm that counsel has completed his ethical duty to inform his client that he is in violation of DoJ policies, because it isn't the court's place to judge whether or not he is in violation of DoJ policies. Counsel has just told the court that he isn't, and has received an exemption, and therefore he has no duty to inform his client anything.
Ocazius 2025-08-22 06:22 a.m.@k Continue questioning.
Ocaziusian 2025-08-22 06:40 a.m.
Are you really asserting that it isn't the court's place to ensure attorneys abide by their ethical obligations
ianAre you really asserting that it isn't the court's place to ensure attorneys abide by their ethical obligations
Ocazius 2025-08-22 06:49 a.m.
Which ethical obligation do you believe is specific to this incident?
Ocazius 2025-08-22 06:49 a.m.
(s)
ian 2025-08-22 07:09 a.m.
Ethical Rules of Professional Conduct 1.4(a)(1) and 1.7
ian 2025-08-22 07:09 a.m.@Ocazius
ian 2025-08-22 07:10 a.m.
Working for an employer that explicitly prohibits you as an attorney from representing somebody creates a conflict of interest for the attorney(edited)
ian 2025-08-22 07:10 a.m.
Because in one hand they want you to win but in the other they want to not be fired
ian 2025-08-22 07:11 a.m.
I don't care if he's in violation of DOJ policy or not, even though I've already consulted with them and it seems that he is. I care that his client was informed, as per counsel's duty to inform him.
Ocazius 2025-08-22 07:25 a.m.
Counsel has informed the court that he is exempted.
Ocazius 2025-08-22 07:25 a.m.
it is not your place to decide ethical violations.
Ocazius 2025-08-22 07:25 a.m.
Counsel is not required ethically to inform his client that he is exempted from a rule that could cause a conflict of interest, because an exemption literally means that the rule does not apply.
Ocazius 2025-08-22 07:26 a.m.
Bring it up with the state bar if you feel so strongly about this, however questioning will continue.
Ocazius 2025-08-22 07:26 a.m.@k continue.
OcaziusCounsel has informed the court that he is exempted.
ian 2025-08-22 08:09 a.m.
Given it gives substantial weight to a likelihood that he has an ethical obligation which this court should ensure is adhered to, in my opinion you should make sure he is
ian 2025-08-22 08:10 a.m.
DOJ's Inspector General's Office has indicated that he was not given an exception to me in a ticket
ian 2025-08-22 08:10 a.m.
Which is why this court should analyze his conduct
ian 2025-08-22 08:10 a.m.
All I am asking is that you make sure he abides by his ethical obligations, as you are encouraged and arguably ethically required to do
k 2025-08-22 08:12 a.m.
ianDOJ's Inspector General's Office has indicated that he was not given an exception to me in a ticket
Ocazius 2025-08-22 08:25 a.m.
Excuse me?
Ocazius 2025-08-22 08:26 a.m.
DOJ's Inspector General's Office either said that he was or wasn't exempted. What do you mean by indicated?
Ocazius 2025-08-22 08:26 a.m.
Please provide a screenshot of this.
Ocazius 2025-08-22 08:26 a.m.@k Similarly, provide a screenshot to prove that you are exempted.
Ocaziusk 2025-08-22 08:30 a.m.
The rule in DOJ is if you have pending cases open before you were hired they are grandfathered from the rule
k 2025-08-22 08:30 a.m.
doj policies should not have any bearing on this court
kThe rule in DOJ is if you have pending cases open before you were hired they are grandfathered from the rule
Ocazius 2025-08-22 08:30 a.m.
Is this a written policy or announcement or just unwritten social rule?
k 2025-08-22 08:30 a.m.
this is a rule that all leadership have considered and given to their members even me
k 2025-08-22 08:31 a.m.
but yet i’ll confirm with the attorney general for my exception
k 2025-08-22 08:31 a.m.
if it makes the defense counselor really feel better(edited)
Ocazius 2025-08-22 08:31 a.m.
Please do, and forward that here.
OcaziusPlease do, and forward that here.
k 2025-08-22 08:42 a.m.
he’s a pretty busy guy so am i allowed to resume questioning
Ocazius 2025-08-22 08:57 a.m.
No, npz_v will crash out
Ocazius 2025-08-22 08:57 a.m.
I cannot allow that
OcaziusNo, npz_v will crash out
ian 2025-08-22 10:01 a.m.
Indeed
ian 2025-08-22 10:02 a.m.
I'm at an important event right now but I'll resume later
OcaziusDOJ's Inspector General's Office either said that he was or wasn't exempted. What do you mean by indicated?
ian 2025-08-22 11:56 a.m.
The person that answered my ticket said he assumes that Xoolaz was not exempted
ian 2025-08-22 11:56 a.m.
I don't suppose he would assume something based off nothing
ianThe person that answered my ticket said he assumes that Xoolaz was not exempted
Ocazius 2025-08-22 12:06 p.m.
That's so helpful
Ocazius 2025-08-22 12:06 p.m.
Ocazius 2025-08-22 12:06 p.m.
Who was it?
OcaziusWho was it?
ian 2025-08-22 12:52 p.m.
EffortlessBrit
Ocazius 2025-08-22 12:53 p.m.@k Who gave you the exemption?
Ocazius 2025-08-22 12:53 p.m.
The AG?
ianEffortlessBrit
k 2025-08-22 12:53 p.m.
I am not employed under effortlessbrit
ian 2025-08-22 12:54 p.m.
EffortlessBrit is a high-ranking member of the DOJ your honor
Ocaziusk 2025-08-22 12:54 p.m.
this is a given. if you have active civil cases you can finish them while you are employed
ian 2025-08-22 12:54 p.m.
And he has access to Inspector General tickets
Ocaziusian 2025-08-22 12:54 p.m.
The concern isn't this, your honor
ian 2025-08-22 12:54 p.m.
It's whether he informed his client
k 2025-08-22 12:54 p.m.
who are you to question doj leaderships
k 2025-08-22 12:54 p.m.
just cause he has access doesn’t mean he’s in that rank to do something
k 2025-08-22 12:55 p.m.
leadership role gives access to all tickets
ian 2025-08-22 12:55 p.m.
How am I questioning DOJ leadership
ian 2025-08-22 12:55 p.m.
I'm questioning you
k 2025-08-22 12:55 p.m.
because effortless brit is not my boss(edited)
ian 2025-08-22 12:55 p.m.
He is a high ranking member of DOJ who indicated to me that you did not receive an exemption
ian 2025-08-22 12:55 p.m.
Please don't edit messages
ianHe is a high ranking member of DOJ who indicated to me that you did not receive an exemption
ian 2025-08-22 12:55 p.m.
How am I "questioning" DOJ leadership?
k 2025-08-22 12:56 p.m.
Because he’s an aag
k 2025-08-22 12:56 p.m.
not a dag or ag
ian 2025-08-22 12:56 p.m.
Okay
ian 2025-08-22 12:56 p.m.
How am I "questioning" DOJ leadership?
k 2025-08-22 12:56 p.m.
what permission does he have to answer the question of how i got permission
k 2025-08-22 12:56 p.m.
if he’s not oag
ian 2025-08-22 12:56 p.m.
Because, like you said, he has thorough access to everything DOJ-related and is knowledgeable about DOJ
ian 2025-08-22 12:57 p.m.@Ocazius Plaintiff's counsel is not making sense
ian 2025-08-22 12:57 p.m.
All I want is that we establish his client gave informed consent to the representation—that comes as him knowing that Xolaaz works for DOJ, which has a no-private-practice rule
Ocazius 2025-08-22 12:58 p.m.@spedvictor
ian 2025-08-22 12:59 p.m.
Counsellor himself could just tell you
Ocazius 2025-08-22 12:59 p.m.
Did you give Xolaaz consent to his representation of yourself in this courtroom, whilst understanding that Xolaaz is Deputy Solicitor General of the Mayflower Justice Department which typically enforces a no-private practice rule for cases commencing post-initation of employment?
Ocazius 2025-08-22 12:59 p.m.@spedvictor
k 2025-08-22 12:59 p.m.
I don’t think he’s home at the moment
kI don’t think he’s home at the moment
Ocazius 2025-08-22 01:00 p.m.
Can you inform the court as to whether or not he gave consent?
k 2025-08-22 01:04 p.m.
Yes he gave consent
k 2025-08-22 01:04 p.m.
I informed him too
k 2025-08-22 01:04 p.m.
I’m not sure why this is such a big issue
k 2025-08-22 01:05 p.m.
You’ve halted my questioning for this interrogation
kI informed him too
ian 2025-08-22 01:05 p.m.
You wouldn't mind showing a screenshot of your message to him to the court
kI’m not sure why this is such a big issue
ian 2025-08-22 01:06 p.m.
Absolutely, I too think ethical violations are no biggie!
ianAbsolutely, I too think ethical violations are no biggie!
Ocazius 2025-08-22 01:07 p.m.
I am reporting this.
Ocazius 2025-08-22 01:08 p.m.@k Are you willing to provide a screenshot to the court?
ian 2025-08-22 01:18 p.m.@k
k 2025-08-22 01:55 p.m.
I’m at school relax
OcaziusToby 2025-08-22 02:08 p.m.
Just gonna say, that'd violate attorney client privilege
TobyJust gonna say, that'd violate attorney client privilege
Ocazius 2025-08-22 02:10 p.m.
Attorney-Client privilege is on the client, not the attorney.
Ocazius 2025-08-22 02:10 p.m.
Therefore, the client can waive his right to the privilege to allow a screenshot of a statement to be shown to the court
OcaziusAttorney-Client privilege is on the client, not the attorney.
Toby 2025-08-22 02:10 p.m.
Help?
Ocazius 2025-08-22 02:10 p.m.
Hence why I asked, 'would you be willing'
Toby 2025-08-22 02:11 p.m.
The client has to consent fitst
Toby 2025-08-22 02:11 p.m.
First
Ocazius 2025-08-22 02:11 p.m.
Oh really it's almost like I just stated that
Toby 2025-08-22 02:11 p.m.
Well you asking if hes willing implies that its up to him to decide if he wants to send it
Ocazius 2025-08-22 02:12 p.m.
I agree, I should have pinged Mr. Kingvictor1000 for better clarification
Ocazius 2025-08-22 02:13 p.m.@spedvictor Per MSBEC Rule 1.6 (a), would you like to consent to Mr. Xolaaz providing a screenshot to the court? Or would you like to provide a screenshot to the court?
Ocazius 2025-08-22 02:14 p.m.
If the first, please inform to Mr. Xolaaz on the specific limitation of the screenshot you would like taken, privately, and inform the court of your waiving here.
ian 2025-08-22 02:50 p.m.@Ocazius you can require proof of him having consented
ian 2025-08-22 02:50 p.m.
it wouldn't break attorney client privilege
ian 2025-08-22 02:50 p.m.
because it's insignificant and doesn't say anything about the case
ian 2025-08-22 02:50 p.m.
he can black out everything else
Ocazius 2025-08-22 02:51 p.m.
Thank you counsellor.
TobyJust gonna say, that'd violate attorney client privilege
k 2025-08-22 03:54 p.m.
OcaziusI agree, I should have pinged Mr. Kingvictor1000 for better clarification
k 2025-08-22 04:38 p.m.
my client has informed me he doesn’t want anything released!
kmy client has informed me he doesn’t want anything released!
ian 2025-08-22 04:45 p.m.
It's not protected
ian 2025-08-22 04:45 p.m.
The judge can order you to show you complied with ethical obligations
ianIt's not protected
Toby 2025-08-22 05:59 p.m.
Help yes it is
Toby 2025-08-22 05:59 p.m.
Any communication between an attorney and his client is privileged
ian 2025-08-22 06:09 p.m.
Hm
ian 2025-08-22 06:09 p.m.
Ok maybe it is
Ocazius 2025-08-23 07:35 a.m.@ian Are you prepared to move on now?
Ocazius 2025-08-23 07:35 a.m.
Mr. Xolaaz has confirmed orally that he definitely warned his client.
Ocazius 2025-08-23 07:35 a.m.
I'd like to continue with trial.
OcaziusI'd like to continue with trial.
ian 2025-08-23 09:08 a.m.
Ok
Ocazius 2025-08-23 11:42 a.m.@k
Ocaziusk 2025-08-23 11:54 a.m.
I can resume?
kI can resume?
Ocazius 2025-08-23 11:56 a.m.
You may.
TobyIts possible
k 2025-08-23 11:58 a.m.
What records did your law firm keep to track tickets opened by clients?
kWhat records did your law firm keep to track tickets opened by clients?
Toby 2025-08-23 11:59 a.m.
Closed tickets or open tickets?
k 2025-08-23 12:00 p.m.
Any records. did your law firm keep closed or open tickets?
k 2025-08-23 12:01 p.m.
records of those tickets being closed, opened
k 2025-08-23 12:02 p.m.@Toby
kAny records. did your law firm keep closed or open tickets?
Toby 2025-08-23 12:04 p.m.
No, they were closed and went into a transcript channel
k 2025-08-23 12:05 p.m.
what do you mean "no,"?
k 2025-08-23 12:05 p.m.
did your firm keep records of tickets, yes or no? @Toby
kwhat do you mean "no,"?
Toby 2025-08-23 12:15 p.m.
No we dont keep tickets open
k 2025-08-23 12:25 p.m.
I asked for a yes or no response
k 2025-08-23 12:25 p.m.
and that isnt even the question I asked
k 2025-08-23 12:25 p.m.@Ocazius can you direct him to respond to my question
k 2025-08-23 12:26 p.m.
two were asked
ktwo were asked
Ocazius 2025-08-23 12:45 p.m.
Just treat him as a hostile witness and I will permit you to ask leading questions
Ocazius 2025-08-23 12:45 p.m.
he pretty clearly said no, I don’t get what you are looking for
Ocaziushe pretty clearly said no, I don’t get what you are looking for
k 2025-08-23 12:45 p.m.
his response is ambiguous
k 2025-08-23 12:46 p.m.
no we dont keep "tickets open"
k 2025-08-23 12:46 p.m.
that can mean that when they close a ticket, it isnt open thats stupid
k 2025-08-23 12:46 p.m.
can i have a more clear response,
k 2025-08-23 12:46 p.m.
did your firm keep records of tickets, yes or no.
k 2025-08-23 12:46 p.m.
I need a reponse to this question ^
kdid your firm keep records of tickets, yes or no.
k 2025-08-23 12:46 p.m.@Toby
Ocazius 2025-08-23 01:03 p.m.
you asked that question and he said no, how is that ambiguous
kthat can mean that when they close a ticket, it isnt open thats stupid
Ocazius 2025-08-23 01:03 p.m.@Toby Clarify this please
Ocaziusyou asked that question and he said no, how is that ambiguous
k 2025-08-23 01:03 p.m.
he answered my question the first time and said no,
k 2025-08-23 01:04 p.m.
but said they have a transcript channel
k 2025-08-23 01:04 p.m.
..? they are conflicting statements
kbut said they have a transcript channel
Toby 2025-08-23 02:47 p.m.
What's difficult to understand? We dont keep tickets open because they get closed, when they're closed the transcript gets sent to a channel, that's how ticket bots work
k 2025-08-23 02:50 p.m.
You answered no to me asking did you keep records.
k 2025-08-23 02:50 p.m.
So you don't keep records of tickets with clients? @Toby
kYou answered no to me asking did you keep records.
Toby 2025-08-23 02:51 p.m.
No i answered no to having tickets opened
kSo you don't keep records of tickets with clients? @Toby
Toby 2025-08-23 02:51 p.m.
We do
k 2025-08-23 02:51 p.m.
thank you for clarifying
Toby 2025-08-23 02:52 p.m.
No problem
ian 2025-08-23 03:19 p.m.
Ocazius 2025-08-24 08:43 a.m.@k
Ocazius 2025-08-24 08:43 a.m.
Continue if you have anything else please
Ocazius 2025-08-25 02:34 p.m.@k
Ocazius 2025-08-25 02:34 p.m.
Continue if you have anything else please
Ocazius used /add
clerkFlow Bot2025-08-25 02:36 p.m. @Ocazius has added @Ian to the case channel.
Case Modified
Ocazius 2025-08-25 02:46 p.m.@Ian
Ian 2025-08-25 03:04 p.m.@Ocazius hi
Ian 2025-08-25 03:05 p.m.
Been 48 hours since the last question
Ian 2025-08-25 03:05 p.m.
Can I present the defense
Ocazius 2025-08-25 03:08 p.m.
I will allow Xolaaz a further two hours to say anything.
Ocazius used /timer
clerkFlow Bot2025-08-25 03:08 p.m. Monday, August 25, 2025 at 5:08 p.m. (5 months ago )
Timer
OcaziusI will allow Xolaaz a further two hours to say anything.
k 2025-08-25 03:58 p.m.
just getting out of school. been busy
k 2025-08-25 03:58 p.m.
will question once i get home.
Ian 2025-08-25 04:31 p.m.@Ocazius it's been 48 hrs y'r h'n'r
Ocazius 2025-08-25 04:35 p.m.@k Have you had straight school for the past 48 hours
Ocaziusk 2025-08-25 04:45 p.m.
we all have important life issues 365 days a year and the last 48 hours have been pretty important
k 2025-08-25 04:45 p.m.
I am free to resume questioning now
kI am free to resume questioning now
Ocazius 2025-08-25 05:13 p.m.
Then why don’t you?
k 2025-08-25 05:16 p.m.@Toby since you had access to tickets, have records of them, did kingvictor1000 ever open a ticket in your discord server for your lawfirm?
kToby 2025-08-25 05:17 p.m.
I don't know
k 2025-08-25 05:17 p.m.
how dont you know?
k 2025-08-25 05:17 p.m.
you had access to tickets, and kept records of them?
TobyI don't know
k 2025-08-25 05:18 p.m.
so you don't know who you had as clients?
k 2025-08-25 05:18 p.m.
because if i recall the primary source of communication between you and your clients were through the ticket system
Toby 2025-08-25 05:18 p.m.
We've had hundreds of clients, and a lot of the time our consultations were closed, so if we got dms and the case was important enough then we'd open it for them
Toby 2025-08-25 05:19 p.m.
so no I do not remember who opened it or if it was victor
Ian 2025-08-25 05:24 p.m.
also
Ian 2025-08-25 05:24 p.m.
this was like
Ian 2025-08-25 05:24 p.m.
so many months ago
Ian 2025-08-25 05:24 p.m.
I didnt even work at clifford chance when this happened so it's like
Ian 2025-08-25 05:24 p.m.
I dont know why you cant believe it when somebody tells you that they dont remember something about an alleged ticket from 6 months ago
k 2025-08-25 05:24 p.m.
you are not testifying, stop typing
Ian 2025-08-25 05:25 p.m.
you cant order me
Ian 2025-08-25 05:25 p.m.
but yes i will stop typing
k 2025-08-25 05:25 p.m.@Ocazius He is interrupting my questioning without an actual objection
k 2025-08-25 05:25 p.m.
I ask for sanctions next time this happens, this is not the first time it's occurred.
Ian 2025-08-25 05:26 p.m.
Besides the time you interrupted yourself for 48 hours, when else has this happened?
k 2025-08-25 05:26 p.m.
Your Honor.
Ian 2025-08-25 05:26 p.m.
You cite a prior occurrence
Ian 2025-08-25 05:26 p.m.
I ask you elaborate
Ian 2025-08-25 05:27 p.m.@Ocazius Like I said I will stop typing but I don't exactly deserve sanctions ..?
OcaziusUnless you doubt that you should be interrupting examination
k 2025-08-25 05:27 p.m.
k 2025-08-25 05:27 p.m.
Now, let me try to resume.
k 2025-08-25 05:29 p.m.@Toby you stated you operate a ticket system, contact clients through that system, lets take a look at this video found in the plaintiff discovery, which can be referred to as exhibit a
https://medal.tv/games/requested/clips/jG0DTY0dygXszuj8R?invite=cr-MSxDUm0sMTg1MzQzMzM0LA78 Views - Watch RIP 50K by spvickta and millions of other Requested videos on Medal. Tags: #requested 
https://medal.tv/games/requested/clips/jG0DTY0dygXszuj8R?invite=cr-MSxDUm0sMTg1MzQzMzM0LA
kk 2025-08-25 05:30 p.m.@Toby go ahead and watch the entire video, let me know once you have.
Toby 2025-08-25 05:32 p.m.
I've watched it
TobyI've watched it
k 2025-08-25 05:33 p.m.
Ok.
TobyI've watched it
k 2025-08-25 05:33 p.m.
given you used tickets, you would know what a ticket looks like, right?
k 2025-08-25 05:33 p.m.
specifically in your lawfirm, your lawfirm tickets.
kgiven you used tickets, you would know what a ticket looks like, right?
Toby 2025-08-25 05:34 p.m.
Yes
k 2025-08-25 05:34 p.m.
ok,
k 2025-08-25 05:34 p.m.
The video I’m showing you depicts the Discord interface for a client ticket, right? @Toby
Toby 2025-08-25 05:34 p.m.
I'm not sure what you mean
k 2025-08-25 05:34 p.m.
?
Toby 2025-08-25 05:34 p.m.
Are you implying that the ticket looks like what it should when a client opens it?
Toby 2025-08-25 05:34 p.m.
or rather asking
k 2025-08-25 05:35 p.m.
I can rephrase it for you
Toby 2025-08-25 05:35 p.m.
please
k 2025-08-25 05:35 p.m.
is this how client tickets looked when opened in your firms discord server?
Toby 2025-08-25 05:35 p.m.
yes
k 2025-08-25 05:35 p.m.
okay, and what is the title of the ticket?
k 2025-08-25 05:35 p.m.
the ticket that is visible in the video.
Toby 2025-08-25 05:35 p.m.
kingvictor ticket
k 2025-08-25 05:36 p.m.
can you say the entire name?
k 2025-08-25 05:36 p.m.
how it's depicted in the video?
Toby 2025-08-25 05:36 p.m.
must i
k 2025-08-25 05:36 p.m.
please, for the record
Toby 2025-08-25 05:36 p.m.
kingvictor1000-ticket
Toby 2025-08-25 05:36 p.m.
retained channel
Toby 2025-08-25 05:36 p.m.
*
k 2025-08-25 05:36 p.m.
Can you put it all together? sorry
Toby 2025-08-25 05:36 p.m.
oml
Toby 2025-08-25 05:36 p.m.
Kingvictor1000-retained-channel
k 2025-08-25 05:37 p.m.
can you identify the discord username of the individual taking the video? from the discord interface? @Toby
kcan you identify the discord username of the individual taking the video? from the discord interface? @Toby
Toby 2025-08-25 05:38 p.m.
Kingvictor1000
k 2025-08-25 05:38 p.m.
Okay, was kingvictor1000 ever employed in your firm? Or had access to view any tickets other then the one in the video?
Toby 2025-08-25 05:38 p.m.
thats compound(edited)
Toby 2025-08-25 05:38 p.m.
but no
k 2025-08-25 05:39 p.m.
let me rephrase so its not incase its objected
k 2025-08-25 05:39 p.m.@Toby was kingvictor1000 ever employed in your firm?
Toby 2025-08-25 05:39 p.m.
no
k 2025-08-25 05:39 p.m.
do people other then employees have access to client tickets?
k 2025-08-25 05:39 p.m.
did*
Toby 2025-08-25 05:39 p.m.
if need be
k 2025-08-25 05:40 p.m.
lets go to 00:02 on exhibit a
k 2025-08-25 05:40 p.m.
scratch that
Toby 2025-08-25 05:40 p.m.
im going to bed
Toby 2025-08-25 05:40 p.m.
gn
kk 2025-08-25 05:41 p.m.@Toby is this ticket from your discords lawfirm?
kClick to see attachment.
Ian 2025-08-25 06:45 p.m.
I was objecting ...
Ian 2025-08-25 06:45 p.m.
holy
kOkay, was kingvictor1000 ever employed in your firm? Or had access to view any tickets other then the one in the video?
Ian 2025-08-25 06:48 p.m.
objection compound
Ian 2025-08-25 06:48 p.m.
for the record, since it was never withdrawn
Ian 2025-08-25 06:48 p.m.@Ocazius
Ianobjection compound
Ocazius 2025-08-26 04:46 a.m.
Sustained for the record, but nothing needs to be amended in his line of questioning as it was rephrased.
kOcazius 2025-08-26 04:46 a.m.@Toby You may answer
OcaziusIan 2025-08-26 06:14 a.m.
Objection
Ian 2025-08-26 06:14 a.m.
Leading
Ian 2025-08-26 07:35 p.m.@Ocazius
IanLeading
Ocazius 2025-08-27 04:08 a.m.
eh
Ocazius 2025-08-27 04:09 a.m.
sustained
Ocazius 2025-08-27 04:09 a.m.@k rephrase
Ocaziusk 2025-08-27 10:27 a.m.
was under the impression you were letting me treat the witness as hostile
OcaziusJust treat him as a hostile witness and I will permit you to ask leading questions
k 2025-08-27 10:27 a.m.
we move to mark the witness as hostile
kwe move to mark the witness as hostile
Ocazius 2025-08-27 10:28 a.m.
You may do so
kOcazius 2025-08-27 10:28 a.m.@Toby Answer the question
OcaziusYou may do so
Toby 2025-08-27 11:03 a.m.
under what grounds lol
Ocazius 2025-08-27 11:17 a.m.
You are a former Defendant in this trial, making you adverse in interest, and your continued relationship with Defendant only furthers that. You have also displayed attempted uncooperativeness fairly often in your answers. The court has the broad power/discretion to exercise reasonable control over the examination of witnesses, and if I deem it fit for you to be treated as a hostile witness (called by the Plaintiff to the stand), in the interest of making these procedures more effective, then so be it.
@k The court allows you to proceed with leading questions in treating the witness as hostile, per FRE 611c.
OcaziusYou are a former Defendant in this trial, making you adverse in interest, and your continued relationship with Defendant only furthers that. You have also displayed attempted uncoo...
Toby 2025-08-27 11:28 a.m.
I haven't once been uncooperative, and Fed Rules aren't binding either, but ok
TobyI haven't once been uncooperative, and Fed Rules aren't binding either, but ok
Ocazius 2025-08-27 11:33 a.m.
I know they aren't, they are used as a guide. If you wish to find me something on the Mayflower Rules of Evidence on hostile witnesses, feel free to do so, however I don't believe something exists.
Ocazius 2025-08-27 11:34 a.m.
And as far as I understand, something that is in reasonable practice in real life per the FRE, however is absent from our rules of procedure, can be put into practice by a Judge. Correct me if you feel that I am wrong or unreasonable to do so.
Ocazius 2025-08-27 11:35 a.m.
Furthermore, need I say anything?
Counsel: "Can you say the entire name?"
Witness: "Must i"
Counsel: "Can you say the entire name?"
Witness: "Must i"
Ocazius 2025-08-27 11:35 a.m.@k Continue with questioning.
kk 2025-08-27 12:39 p.m.@Toby is this ticket from your discords lawfirm?
Ian 2025-08-27 12:59 p.m.
Objection lack of foundation @Ocazius
Ian 2025-08-27 12:59 p.m.
Before this question there should be a “can you read the server name,” “it reads X” to establish a foundation
Ocazius 2025-08-27 01:02 p.m.@k Please identify the discord server
Ocazius 2025-08-27 01:02 p.m.
Sustained for the record
k 2025-08-27 10:03 p.m.@Toby given you watched the video, please read the discord server name. what does it say?
kk 2025-08-27 10:04 p.m.
the server name in which the channel for the ticket we are viewing
kthe server name in which the channel for the ticket we are viewing
k 2025-08-27 10:04 p.m.
*is visible in
Ian 2025-08-27 10:06 p.m.
Uhh what
Ian 2025-08-27 10:06 p.m.@k can you withdraw and rephrase coherently
Ian 2025-08-27 10:06 p.m.
Pls
Ian 2025-08-27 10:06 p.m.
Otherwise I have to object
Ian 2025-08-27 10:07 p.m.
Bc the question makes no sense you clarified a million times and the actual meaning was left stranded
k 2025-08-27 10:07 p.m.
there is one question in that entire line of text
Ian 2025-08-27 10:07 p.m.
Just say I withdraw and then ask again this time with your clarifications in mind
k 2025-08-27 10:08 p.m.
here let me put it into smooth brain context:
Ian 2025-08-27 10:08 p.m.
Withdraw first
kk 2025-08-27 10:08 p.m.
I withdraw this question
Ian 2025-08-27 10:08 p.m.
Thank u
Ian 2025-08-27 10:08 p.m.
I appreciate
Ian 2025-08-27 10:08 p.m.
Go ahead
k 2025-08-27 10:08 p.m.
Make an actual objection. Then you can interrupt my questioning.
k 2025-08-27 10:08 p.m.
We went over this.
Ian 2025-08-27 10:08 p.m.
Yes I objected on grounds that the question made no sense
k 2025-08-27 10:09 p.m.
there was no official objection
Ian 2025-08-27 10:09 p.m.
You were getting to the part where you friendily re-asked
k 2025-08-27 10:09 p.m.
you are just typing, so stop typing while i write these questions out
Ian 2025-08-27 10:09 p.m.
Ok
k 2025-08-27 10:09 p.m.
Thanks.
k 2025-08-27 10:09 p.m.@Toby please read to the court the name of the discord server that we are currently viewing in the video
Ian 2025-08-27 10:10 p.m.
Ty
Ocazius 2025-08-31 08:18 a.m.@Toby You’ve had 82 hours to answer…
Ocazius 2025-08-31 08:18 a.m.
I am not being a jerk, but it is totally unfair towards the Defendant and the Plaintiff to have stalled.
Ocazius 2025-08-31 08:19 a.m.
If this happens again, or you don’t answer in the next 12 hours, I will begin fining you.
OcaziusToby 2025-08-31 08:28 a.m.
Woops, was busy with work these last few days
kToby 2025-08-31 08:29 a.m.
Kingvictor100 retained channel
TobyKingvictor100 retained channel
Ocazius 2025-08-31 08:49 a.m.
Please read counsel’s question again
Toby 2025-08-31 08:53 a.m.
Oh
Toby 2025-08-31 08:53 a.m.
Kingley Napley Ltd/LLC
TobyKingley Napley Ltd/LLC
k 2025-08-31 09:30 a.m.
So was that your discord server?
kSo was that your discord server?
Toby 2025-08-31 09:49 a.m.
Yes
TobyYes
k 2025-08-31 10:24 a.m.
so is it safe to say the ticket in the exhibit a is from your discord server?
Ian 2025-08-31 10:27 a.m.
Objection leading
Ian 2025-08-31 10:28 a.m.
So much leading coming from mr Xolaaz
Ian 2025-08-31 10:28 a.m.
I’m being lead so much …
Ian 2025-08-31 10:28 a.m.@Ocazius
Ocazius 2025-08-31 10:37 a.m.
Please stop making baseless and frivolous objections. Overruled. @Toby Answer the question.
OcaziusPlease stop making baseless and frivolous objections. Overruled. @Toby Answer the question.
Ian 2025-08-31 11:01 a.m.
It’s a direct examination and he’s leading the witness
Ian 2025-08-31 11:01 a.m.
How is it frivolous
Ian 2025-08-31 11:02 a.m.
“Is it safe to say that …” is not appropriate in a direct
Ocazius 2025-08-31 11:13 a.m.
Is this a joke?
Ocazius 2025-08-31 11:13 a.m.
Counsel moved to question the witness as a hostile witness and I approved...??
Ocazius 2025-08-31 11:14 a.m.
A hostile witness can be questioned in a leading manner...??
Ocazius 2025-08-31 11:15 a.m.
Interrupt again with this nonesense and I will sanction you.
kso is it safe to say the ticket in the exhibit a is from your discord server?
Toby 2025-08-31 11:17 a.m.
Yes
OcaziusCounsel moved to question the witness as a hostile witness and I approved...??
Ian 2025-08-31 11:18 a.m.
oh that's right
Ian 2025-08-31 11:18 a.m.
my apologies
k 2025-08-31 12:07 p.m.@Toby move to admit exhibit a (video of ticket)
kToby 2025-08-31 12:07 p.m.
So admitted
k 2025-08-31 12:07 p.m.
accurate depiction of events
Toby 2025-08-31 12:07 p.m.
LOL
k 2025-08-31 12:08 p.m.
Thanks your fonor (fake honor)
kk 2025-08-31 12:08 p.m.@Ocazius *
kThanks your fonor (fake honor)
Toby 2025-08-31 12:08 p.m.
Anymore of the cheek and I'll hold you in contempt boy
TobySo admitted
Ian 2025-08-31 12:08 p.m.
Did u take ur dementia meds
Ocazius 2025-08-31 12:09 p.m.
Chat who let this guy out of the hospital
IanDid u take ur dementia meds
Toby 2025-08-31 12:09 p.m.
Who are you again
Ian 2025-08-31 12:09 p.m.
Does Toby rule? Four five six eight.
Ocazius 2025-08-31 12:09 p.m.
k 2025-08-31 12:09 p.m.
Toby 2025-08-31 12:10 p.m.
Ian 2025-08-31 12:11 p.m.
Ian 2025-08-31 12:11 p.m.
We’re all gonna get held in contempt
Ian 2025-08-31 12:11 p.m.
Ocazius 2025-08-31 12:12 p.m.@Ian Do you have an objection to the admittance of this exhibit into evidence?
Ian 2025-08-31 12:13 p.m.
Hm
Ian 2025-08-31 12:13 p.m.
Let me think….
Ocazius 2025-08-31 12:14 p.m.
I guess there's a first time for everything
Ian 2025-08-31 12:14 p.m.
HA
Ian 2025-08-31 12:15 p.m.
Ian 2025-08-31 12:15 p.m.
Objection
IanObjection
Ocazius 2025-08-31 12:16 p.m.
Continue
Ian 2025-08-31 12:16 p.m.
One sec Ill turn on my pc
Ian 2025-08-31 12:17 p.m.
so
Ian 2025-08-31 12:18 p.m.
to properly authenticate this evidence, because it is not self authenticating, it must be proven to be genuine
Ocazius 2025-08-31 12:18 p.m.
Agreed
Ian 2025-08-31 12:18 p.m.
asking a witness who was not involved in the taking or recollection of this exhibit to read a few
Ian 2025-08-31 12:18 p.m.
texts
Ian 2025-08-31 12:18 p.m.
from it
Ian 2025-08-31 12:18 p.m.
isn't really authenticating
Ocazius 2025-08-31 12:18 p.m.
It cannot be 100% authenticated as the witness is not the owner or taker of the exhibit (struggling to understand the strategy of this stand order...)
Ian 2025-08-31 12:18 p.m.
yes
Ocazius 2025-08-31 12:19 p.m.@k I'm not entirely sure why you did this or what you hoped to gain from it
Ocazius 2025-08-31 12:20 p.m.
It will be difficult for you to fully authenticate the exhibit with this witness, however nevertheless I implore you to ask some more questions regarding the exhibit in order to build more ground to your motion.
k 2025-08-31 12:20 p.m.
i am not done questioning
Ian 2025-08-31 12:20 p.m.
I also dont understand this direct strategy
Ocazius 2025-08-31 12:21 p.m.
I will be denying its admittance into evidence at this moment, please continue trying to authenticate it with the witness and then I will reconsider once you move to have it admitted again.
IanI also dont understand this direct strategy
k 2025-08-31 12:21 p.m.
nobody asked
k 2025-08-31 12:21 p.m.
when you have 6 other cases along with a last second call to stand you don’t need to understand
k 2025-08-31 12:21 p.m.
so yes it’s entirely my fault. however
k 2025-08-31 12:21 p.m.
im not done questioning
Ian 2025-08-31 12:21 p.m.
your honor the plaintiff counsel has insulted me in open court
Ian 2025-08-31 12:21 p.m.
that's in the official record
Ian 2025-08-31 12:21 p.m.
can he be sanctioned
k 2025-08-31 12:21 p.m.
interrupt my questioning and we can talk about sanctions
Ian 2025-08-31 12:22 p.m.
ive only interrupted you with non-frivolous objections
k 2025-08-31 12:22 p.m.
done talking to you
Ian 2025-08-31 12:22 p.m.
and that's irrelevant
k 2025-08-31 12:22 p.m.
i’ll question later once i get off the plane
Ian 2025-08-31 12:22 p.m.
you just insulted me
k 2025-08-31 12:22 p.m.
Thanks your honor.
Ocazius 2025-08-31 12:22 p.m.
Shut up
Ocazius 2025-08-31 12:22 p.m.
Holy f word
OcaziusHoly f word
Ian 2025-08-31 12:22 p.m.
Hey
Ocazius 2025-08-31 12:22 p.m.@Ian I am 100% tired of your yap
Ocazius 2025-08-31 12:22 p.m.
All you do is talk when I'm trying to communicate with Mr. Xolaaz
Ocazius 2025-08-31 12:22 p.m.
Please hush and stop inciting fury within him
Ian 2025-08-31 12:22 p.m.
understood
Ian 2025-08-31 12:22 p.m.
I love talking
Ocazius 2025-08-31 12:23 p.m.
Who would have guessed
Ian 2025-08-31 12:23 p.m.
Right??
k 2025-08-31 12:23 p.m.
Your honor if i may request complete silence unless an official objection is made
k 2025-08-31 12:23 p.m.
I have to constantly scroll
IanRight??
Ocazius 2025-08-31 12:23 p.m.
See, nobody invited you to speak here but you just keep continuing the line
k 2025-08-31 12:23 p.m.
Same may apply to when he is cross
Ocazius 2025-08-31 12:23 p.m.
it clogs up the channel, is unrelated to the case, and hinders my ability to communicate with Mr. Xolaaz
Ian 2025-08-31 12:23 p.m.
ok I will shut up
Ocazius 2025-08-31 12:23 p.m.
STOP TYPING
Ocazius 2025-08-31 12:23 p.m.
AHHHHH
k 2025-08-31 12:24 p.m.
Can you respond to request your honor
k 2025-08-31 12:24 p.m.
It goes both ways
k 2025-08-31 12:24 p.m.
i have many cases to manage and do not like my case channels being blown
kYour honor if i may request complete silence unless an official objection is made
Ocazius 2025-08-31 12:24 p.m.
This has always been in place, however Mr. Defendant chooses to continually violate this rule.
Ocazius 2025-08-31 12:24 p.m.@Ian One more and I begin issuing fines.
k 2025-08-31 12:24 p.m.
Thanks, and i’ll resume questioning later today
Ocazius 2025-08-31 12:25 p.m.
Now, @k , as previously ruled, please continue questionin when you can to fully authenticate the evidence before once again requesting it to be admitted to evidence.
kThanks, and i’ll resume questioning later today
Ocazius 2025-08-31 12:25 p.m.
Thank you.
Ocazius 2025-08-31 12:26 p.m.
I will, from now on, be enforcing silence during questioning, and 24 hour periods between a question and its next, and 24 hour periods between an answer and its next.
Ocazius 2025-08-31 12:26 p.m.
Please emulate the conduct of attorneys in the British justice system and quit rabbling each other like wild prairie dogs.
Ian 2025-08-31 12:27 p.m.
if I may
Ocazius 2025-08-31 12:27 p.m.
...
Ian 2025-08-31 12:27 p.m.
I swear it is pertinent
Ocazius 2025-08-31 12:27 p.m.
You may...
Ian 2025-08-31 12:28 p.m.
I believe that system of examinations will be largely inefficient, perhaps we could schedule for a non-asynchronous trial in-game
Ian 2025-08-31 12:28 p.m.
continuing from where we've left off here obviously
Ian 2025-08-31 12:28 p.m.
and if it's not enough, then we schedule a subsequent one
Ocazius 2025-08-31 12:29 p.m.
At this rate, I am inclined to allow an in-game trial per witness questioning...
Ocazius 2025-08-31 12:29 p.m.@Ian @Toby @k Please drop your available time periods tomorrow in GMT timezone.
Ocazius 2025-08-31 12:30 p.m.
I will not be utilizing whentomeet as it disgusts me.
Ocazius 2025-08-31 12:30 p.m.
Note that tomorrow refers to Monday 1st September.
OcaziusAt this rate, I am inclined to allow an in-game trial per witness questioning...
k 2025-08-31 12:31 p.m.
in game requires further coordination whereas a witness can just easily reply in this channel
Ocazius 2025-08-31 12:32 p.m.
Easily?
k 2025-08-31 12:32 p.m.
also i am majority of the time unable to in game as i handle most of this stuff out of the house
Ocazius 2025-08-31 12:32 p.m.
Took 82 hours last question
kin game requires further coordination whereas a witness can just easily reply in this channel
Ian 2025-08-31 12:32 p.m.
We will take months to finish
k 2025-08-31 12:32 p.m.
that witness i can’t tell you what he was doing
kalso i am majority of the time unable to in game as i handle most of this stuff out of the house
Ocazius 2025-08-31 12:32 p.m.
Are you never home?
k 2025-08-31 12:32 p.m.
i don’t know his timezone
OcaziusAre you never home?
k 2025-08-31 12:32 p.m.
i’ve been out of state for majority of this entire case
Ocazius 2025-08-31 12:32 p.m.
And when are you in state?
k 2025-08-31 12:32 p.m.
i’m flying back today
ki’ve been out of state for majority of this entire case
Ian 2025-08-31 12:32 p.m.
if I may
k 2025-08-31 12:33 p.m.
are you going to challenge that i haven’t been out of state
k 2025-08-31 12:33 p.m.
want to track my flight?
Ian 2025-08-31 12:33 p.m.
may I @Ocazius
Ian 2025-08-31 12:33 p.m.
that's not it
Ianmay I @Ocazius
Ocazius 2025-08-31 12:39 p.m.
You may
ki’m flying back today
Ocazius 2025-08-31 12:40 p.m.
So, excuse me if I'm wrong, but therefore your point that you haven't been home for a long time as an argument for why the trial shouldn't be held in-game, is completely invalid... because you will now be home and thus available to be in-game from tomorrow...?
kare you going to challenge that i haven’t been out of state
Ian 2025-08-31 12:43 p.m.
it's ok that you're out of state
Ian 2025-08-31 12:43 p.m.
obviously you can't be at fault for being out of state
Ian 2025-08-31 12:43 p.m.
but a diligence concern for you as an attorney arises when you can't complete your necessary duties and yet you continue representing the client
Ian 2025-08-31 12:44 p.m.
you've demonstrated that you cannot duly and diligently examine witnesses timely, instead often taking very long periods to do so, which means that the only thing we can do is a non-asynchronous trial
Ian 2025-08-31 12:45 p.m.
if you can't do a non-asynchronous trial, that means that every single course of action you can take will result in undue delay to the proceedings, meaning you should ethically recuse and have your client find another attorney
Ian 2025-08-31 12:46 p.m.
unless, of course, he waives that undue lack of diligence on your part and gives his informed consent, but in that case it'd still be in the court's inherent power to have you appoint somebody else to take care of trial given your non-diligent nature
Ian 2025-08-31 12:46 p.m.
tldr if you cant attend ingame trial bc youre out of state, you should either recuse on your own or the court should appoint somebody beside you who can
Ian 2025-08-31 12:47 p.m.@Ocazius
OcaziusToby 2025-08-31 12:48 p.m.
Im free all week sis
Toby 2025-08-31 12:48 p.m.
Except from Thursday onwards
Ian 2025-08-31 12:55 p.m.
Im generally available 17:00–00:30 on weekdays and 13:00–2:00 on weekends
Ianbut a diligence concern for you as an attorney arises when you can't complete your necessary duties and yet you continue representing the client
k 2025-08-31 01:07 p.m.
You should refrain from calling me a concerning attorney
k 2025-08-31 01:07 p.m.
Furthermore, it was your client that failed to respond in 2-3 days when I asked him a question, even pingingh im
Iantldr if you cant attend ingame trial bc youre out of state, you should either recuse on your own or the court should appoint somebody beside you who can
k 2025-08-31 01:08 p.m.
ingame trials are not a priority in this court
k 2025-08-31 01:09 p.m.
majority if not 80% of these cases are held by discord where both parties are in agreement to conduct these proceedings over discord
kYou should refrain from calling me a concerning attorney
Ian 2025-08-31 01:09 p.m.
I said diligence concerned you
Ian 2025-08-31 01:09 p.m.
?
k 2025-08-31 01:09 p.m.
you are suing us, we arent suing you
kFurthermore, it was your client that failed to respond in 2-3 days when I asked him a question, even pingingh im
Ian 2025-08-31 01:10 p.m.
1. I don't have a client, I'm the defendant in this case and I'm pro se
2. The WITNESS, toby, was acting as a witness, and not as an attorney that necessarily has to be diligent
2. The WITNESS, toby, was acting as a witness, and not as an attorney that necessarily has to be diligent
Ianyou've demonstrated that you cannot duly and diligently examine witnesses timely, instead often taking very long periods to do so, which means that the only thing we can do is a no...
k 2025-08-31 01:10 p.m.
Please demonstrate and provide an example where I take "very long periods"
vloqsouls 2025-08-31 01:10 p.m.
kyou are suing us, we arent suing you
Ian 2025-08-31 01:10 p.m.
Dude
Ian 2025-08-31 01:10 p.m.
what
Ian 2025-08-31 01:10 p.m.
You're hte plaintiff's counsel in this case
Ian 2025-08-31 01:10 p.m.
What are you talking about
k 2025-08-31 01:10 p.m.
I rephrased that wrong
Ian 2025-08-31 01:10 p.m.@Ocazius ???
k 2025-08-31 01:10 p.m.
Can you like stop typing for one second
k 2025-08-31 01:10 p.m.
You did this last time I mistyped something and didn't let me explain
kPlease demonstrate and provide an example where I take "very long periods"
Ian 2025-08-31 01:10 p.m.
I don't believe I need to because the judge is aware of it but I will if needed, @Ocazius
k 2025-08-31 01:10 p.m.
but you type like a kid in the candy store just blabbering ur mouth
k 2025-08-31 01:11 p.m.
Just literally stop typing and let me explain
k 2025-08-31 01:11 p.m.
If that's not too hard
Ian 2025-08-31 01:11 p.m.
OK make your point
k 2025-08-31 01:11 p.m.
This witness is in GMT correct?
Ian 2025-08-31 01:11 p.m.
Are you asking me
Ian 2025-08-31 01:12 p.m.
I think he is
k 2025-08-31 01:12 p.m.
hes in BST
k 2025-08-31 01:12 p.m.
so theres a 6 hour time differntial between my time and histie
k 2025-08-31 01:12 p.m.
What timezone are you?
Ian 2025-08-31 01:17 p.m.
utc-3
Ian 2025-08-31 01:20 p.m.@k
Ian 2025-08-31 01:20 p.m.
what's the problem
vloqsoulsOcazius 2025-08-31 01:24 p.m.
The one channel on discord where I get work experience for babysitting pre-schoolers
Ocazius 2025-08-31 01:25 p.m.@k Please answer my question as to what times tomorrow you are available.
Ocazius 2025-08-31 01:25 p.m.
If I find that no time can accommodate all three of you, we will continue asynchronously with time limits.
Ocazius 2025-08-31 01:25 p.m.
However I have not witnessed activity so excessive that it warrants a disqualification of counsel.
Ocaziusk 2025-08-31 03:46 p.m.
tomorrow is a holiday, i celebrate labor day every year so im likely unavailable
Ocazius 2025-09-01 12:22 p.m.@k Continue with questioning then.
Ian 2025-09-02 05:54 p.m.@Ocazius ?
Ian 2025-09-02 05:54 p.m.
It keeps happening
kPlease demonstrate and provide an example where I take "very long periods"
Ian 2025-09-02 05:55 p.m.
This is ironically one of the messages last sent by xolaaz it’s not even funny anymore
Ian 2025-09-02 05:55 p.m.@Ocazius can you just waive their presentation
Ian 2025-09-02 05:56 p.m.
He’s refused to try to do other things to keep the pace going and at this rate trial will never end
k 2025-09-02 06:04 p.m.
It was a holiday yesterday and I just got home from school.
k 2025-09-02 06:04 p.m.
Relax.
k 2025-09-02 06:05 p.m.@Ocazius Your Honor, the witness has confirmed this is from his law firm’s Discord server, that it uses their system, and that the ticket naming convention matches their practice. I will later have my client testify to the creation and accuracy of the video, but at this stage I ask that the exhibit be conditionally admitted, subject to that testimony.
kk 2025-09-02 06:05 p.m.
witness has confirmed exhibit a is from-*
k 2025-09-02 06:07 p.m.@Toby Your firm entered into a retainer agreement with my client, kingvictor1000, correct?
k 2025-09-02 06:07 p.m.
That agreement required my client to pay $50,000, correct?
Toby 2025-09-02 06:08 p.m.
Compound much
Ian 2025-09-02 06:08 p.m.
Im objecting please let me type
Ian 2025-09-02 06:08 p.m.
No type
Ian 2025-09-02 06:08 p.m.
NO TYPE
k 2025-09-02 06:08 p.m.
Im typing.
TobyCompound much
k 2025-09-02 06:09 p.m.
This is not compound. Should you see how I separated my messages, I am asking my questions in a format to avoid the whole waiting a day to respond.
k 2025-09-02 06:09 p.m.
They are stacked ontop of each other. Not asked together.
kThis is not compound. Should you see how I separated my messages, I am asking my questions in a format to avoid the whole waiting a day to respond.
Toby 2025-09-02 06:09 p.m.
You asked 2 questions assuming one led on from the other while both were related
kIan 2025-09-02 06:09 p.m.
I would object to this. The court has already overruled objections on my part of the plaintiff’s questions even though they lacked a foundation, because it trusted that plaintiff would later establish a foundation. A foundation was never established. Counsel should be expected to just do things as is procedurally proper from now
kThat agreement required my client to pay $50,000, correct?
Ian 2025-09-02 06:09 p.m.
Objection
Ian 2025-09-02 06:09 p.m.
Compound
Ian 2025-09-02 06:09 p.m.
Also lack of foundation
k 2025-09-02 06:10 p.m.
Lack of foundation...
k 2025-09-02 06:10 p.m.@Toby Stop typing while I handle this
Toby 2025-09-02 06:10 p.m.
Im just a witness not gonna argue 
Ian 2025-09-02 06:10 p.m.
You havent shown the agreement
Ian 2025-09-02 06:10 p.m.
Or authenticated it
k 2025-09-02 06:11 p.m.
Retard
k 2025-09-02 06:11 p.m.
how am I supposed to confirm the existance of the document without asking the witness about it first
Toby 2025-09-02 06:11 p.m.
k 2025-09-02 06:11 p.m.
please someone find him a nursing home
Ian 2025-09-02 06:11 p.m.@Ocazius this is simply unacceptable at this point. This is the second time plaintiff’s counsel insults me directly on the record, and I’ve only made two, good-faith objections, while all he did was cross-talk mindlessly with the witness
Ian 2025-09-02 06:12 p.m.
I move for sanctions formally and, if you’d wish, I’ll have a paper motion to submit
Ian 2025-09-02 06:12 p.m.
I insist on that the plaintiff have their presentation waived
k 2025-09-02 06:12 p.m.
No sorry
k 2025-09-02 06:12 p.m.
Your the one the judge has a problem with, not me
Ian 2025-09-02 06:12 p.m.
We’re crosstalking now?
Ian 2025-09-02 06:12 p.m.
Ok
k 2025-09-02 06:12 p.m.
Also should you file a paper motion, I have sanctions ready to file for everything you've done so we can just double it.
Ian 2025-09-02 06:13 p.m.
This is a courtroom
k 2025-09-02 06:13 p.m.
Done talking to you
k 2025-09-02 06:13 p.m.@Ocazius Rule on the objections, make a ruling on my oral request
k 2025-09-02 06:13 p.m.
Please and thank you!
Toby 2025-09-02 06:13 p.m.
Ian 2025-09-02 06:13 p.m.
LOL
Ian 2025-09-02 06:13 p.m.
??
Ian 2025-09-03 02:36 p.m.@Ocazius
Ocazius 2025-09-03 02:54 p.m.
I've been advised to restrain my contempt gavel
Ocazius 2025-09-03 02:55 p.m.
But holy cow
Ocazius 2025-09-03 02:57 p.m.GOING FORWARD
1. Npz_v may file a paper motion regarding his sanctions or removal of counsel or whatever he wishes to do, during questioning, as he has notified.
2. Xolaaz will continue questioning. If a 24 hour period passes between an answer and a question, I will not be happy.
3. Xolaaz may file for sanctions against npz_v as he has notified.
1. Npz_v may file a paper motion regarding his sanctions or removal of counsel or whatever he wishes to do, during questioning, as he has notified.
2. Xolaaz will continue questioning. If a 24 hour period passes between an answer and a question, I will not be happy.
3. Xolaaz may file for sanctions against npz_v as he has notified.
Ocazius 2025-09-03 02:57 p.m.@k Ask your question.
Ocaziusk 2025-09-03 03:02 p.m.
To avoid all of the sheer crying
k 2025-09-03 03:03 p.m.
May i move my questioning format to stacked on top of each other to reduce the time between questions.
k 2025-09-03 03:03 p.m.
Not asked together but posted above or below
k 2025-09-03 03:03 p.m.
As other judges allow
Ocazius 2025-09-03 03:05 p.m.
No, I personally find that absolutely repulsive. Each question should be formed upon and tailored upon the previous' answer, for efficient questioning.
Ocazius 2025-09-03 03:05 p.m.
Please begin asking your questions ASAP so that we may get moving.
Ian 2025-09-03 03:47 p.m.@Ocazius Surely this is not the stage for it
Ian 2025-09-03 03:47 p.m.
But,
Ian 2025-09-03 03:48 p.m.
Clifford Chance is dissolved while its liabilities stay at Clifford Chance
Ian 2025-09-03 03:48 p.m.
which is kind of confusing
Ian 2025-09-03 03:48 p.m.
I guess it'd make sense if it was a sole proprietorship, because the person 'doing business as' would keep the debts
Ian 2025-09-03 03:48 p.m.
but I'm explicitly separate from clifford chance because it was an LLC
Ian 2025-09-03 03:48 p.m.
it doesn't really . . . have any money
Ian 2025-09-03 03:49 p.m.
and the corporate veil is there so really I can't be asked for it either
Ocazius 2025-09-03 04:01 p.m.
Wasn’t this already covered?
Ocazius 2025-09-03 04:01 p.m.
If you want to file a written motion then do so, but I’d like to continue questioning in the meantime.
OcaziusWasn’t this already covered?
Ian 2025-09-03 04:11 p.m.
Not quite
Ian 2025-09-03 04:15 p.m.
Perhaps we should explore it at the end of trial though
Ian 2025-09-03 04:15 p.m.
He can continue questioning
Ocazius 2025-09-03 04:24 p.m.
This isn’t forest school, there is no collective exploration at the end of trial. If you want to submit a motion, submit a motion.
Ian 2025-09-03 04:24 p.m.
What’s forest school got to do with it
Ian 2025-09-03 04:24 p.m.
The question is about damages
Ian 2025-09-03 04:24 p.m.
Damages aren’t determined during trial
k 2025-09-03 04:34 p.m.@Toby Since you didn't answer my question i will reask
k 2025-09-03 04:34 p.m.
Your firm entered into a retainer agreement with my client, kingvictor1000, correct?
IanThe question is about damages
Ocazius 2025-09-03 04:37 p.m.
Oh I misunderstood, I thought you were bringing back the liability discussion
Ocazius 2025-09-03 04:37 p.m.
If it’s about damages, then if you aren’t found liable it doesn’t matter. If you are found liable, I will hold a damages hearing so I’ll let you speak in the event that that happens.
Ocazius 2025-09-03 04:37 p.m.
Now please cease discussion of the matter in the meantime.
Ian 2025-09-03 05:30 p.m.
alright
kYour firm entered into a retainer agreement with my client, kingvictor1000, correct?
Ian 2025-09-03 05:30 p.m.
objection @Ocazius lack of foundation
k 2025-09-03 05:31 p.m.
brochacho
Ian 2025-09-03 05:31 p.m.
also
k 2025-09-03 05:31 p.m.
that is not a foundational objection
Ian 2025-09-03 05:31 p.m.
legal conclusion
Ian 2025-09-03 05:31 p.m.
Are you going to start referring to me respectfully
kYour firm entered into a retainer agreement with my client, kingvictor1000, correct?
Ian 2025-09-03 05:33 p.m.
objection for lack of foundation, lack of specificity, and legal conclusion
k 2025-09-03 05:35 p.m.
he either entered a retainer or he did not.. this is NOT a legal conclusion
Ian 2025-09-03 05:36 p.m.
Whether a contract is "entered" into or not is a matter of law and a legal conclusion
k 2025-09-03 05:36 p.m.
lord guide me and bless me for these future messages
Ian 2025-09-03 05:37 p.m.
let the judge decide
kYour firm entered into a retainer agreement with my client, kingvictor1000, correct?
Toby 2025-09-03 06:33 p.m.
yes
Toby 2025-09-03 06:34 p.m.
oh wait theres objections
Toby 2025-09-03 06:34 p.m.
oops
Ian 2025-09-03 06:37 p.m.@Ocazius
Ian 2025-09-03 06:37 p.m.
lack of foundation, lack of specificity and legal onclusion
Ocazius 2025-09-04 11:15 a.m.
Will review later
IanWhether a contract is "entered" into or not is a matter of law and a legal conclusion
Ian 2025-09-04 12:56 p.m.
You would ask “did you sign this” for example
k 2025-09-04 01:04 p.m.
no...
Ian 2025-09-04 01:05 p.m.
Let the judge rule
k 2025-09-04 01:05 p.m.
right, let the judge rule, didn't ask you to rephrase my questioning to an incorrect way
k 2025-09-04 01:05 p.m.
my version of questioning is not objectable to
kright, let the judge rule, didn't ask you to rephrase my questioning to an incorrect way
Ian 2025-09-04 01:05 p.m.
What
Ian 2025-09-04 01:05 p.m.
I suggested how you coukd rephrase
Ian 2025-09-04 01:06 p.m.
I didn’t myself rephrase because I never said it in the first place
k 2025-09-04 01:06 p.m.
right, nobody asked you to
k 2025-09-04 01:06 p.m.
let the judge rule.
Ian 2025-09-04 01:06 p.m.
They hired a ragebaiter for a solicitor general
Ocazius 2025-09-04 03:42 p.m.@k I don't like the 'you entered into a retainer agreement'. Establish this first by displaying signing, facts related to that etc. Objection sustained, please rephrase
k 2025-09-04 03:42 p.m.
Dear god
Ian 2025-09-04 03:42 p.m.
Duh
OcaziusIan 2025-09-04 03:42 p.m.
Thanks your honor
UserMessage could not be loaded.
Ian 2025-09-04 03:43 p.m.
Ian 2025-09-04 03:43 p.m.@Ocazius
Ian 2025-09-04 03:43 p.m.
You would think that a counsellor would take a judge's disagreement with them respectfully, and that they would continue to be professional
k 2025-09-04 03:44 p.m.
Got a request? Submit a motion
Ian 2025-09-04 03:44 p.m.
No, I'm simply bringing it to the attention of the court
k 2025-09-04 03:44 p.m.
Great make a motion
Ian 2025-09-04 03:44 p.m.
No, I'm simply bringing it to the attention of the court
Ian 2025-09-04 03:44 p.m.
I think insulting the court is unconventional and I'm bringing the fact that it happened to its attention
Ian 2025-09-04 03:44 p.m.
But whether or not it wants to sanction you is not something I'm particularly concerned about personally
Ian 2025-09-04 03:45 p.m.
I'll remark you've been similarly disrespectful throughout the proceedings
k 2025-09-04 03:45 p.m.
chatroom is off record
Ocazius 2025-09-04 03:46 p.m.@Ian
IanDuh
Ocazius 2025-09-04 03:46 p.m.
I've repeatedly told you to stop with this conduct.
Ocazius 2025-09-04 03:46 p.m.
I'm not being a jerk but enough is enough...
Ocazius 2025-09-04 03:47 p.m.
You are hereby fined $300 and ordered to pay it to a random person in the next 48 hours, or I will order you to show cause.
Ocazius 2025-09-04 03:48 p.m.@k Quit whining and rephrase your questions. Not sure how you can not know how to ask proper questions in the court of law and then complain when somebody calls you out for it...
k 2025-09-04 03:48 p.m.
This was the most incorrect way to rule
OcaziusI've repeatedly told you to stop with this conduct.
Ian 2025-09-04 03:48 p.m.
I was replying to plaintiff counsellor's "dear god" statement, which arguably is much more impertinent
k 2025-09-04 03:48 p.m.
for the record, what objection is sustained
k 2025-09-04 03:48 p.m.
he madee three
Ian 2025-09-04 03:48 p.m.
I disagree with that I'm being fined and not him
Ian 2025-09-04 03:49 p.m.
I would ask you reconsider
kThis was the most incorrect way to rule
Ocazius 2025-09-04 03:50 p.m.
It's on the record, appeal if you wish.
IanI would ask you reconsider
Ocazius 2025-09-04 03:50 p.m.
No. If this happens again, I will keep fining. I think I have been incredibly lenient with this.
Ocazius 2025-09-04 03:51 p.m.
I come on here to enjoy myself, not to babysit two neckbearded beasts...
Ocazius 2025-09-04 03:51 p.m.@k Continue questioning. I am sustaining the first objection
k 2025-09-04 03:52 p.m.
Lack of foundation?
OcaziusNo. If this happens again, I will keep fining. I think I have been incredibly lenient with this.
Ian 2025-09-04 03:52 p.m.
I'm referring to the fact that plaintiffs counsel has been considerably more disruptve
Ocazius 2025-09-04 03:52 p.m.
I believe he rephrased the objection to legal conclusion
IanI'm referring to the fact that plaintiffs counsel has been considerably more disruptve
Ocazius 2025-09-04 03:53 p.m.
And he will be fined if he chooses to continue in such a manner.
Ocazius 2025-09-04 03:53 p.m.
What if you both just stopped attacking eachother and displayed some respect in my robloxian court channel? I mean it cannot be that difficult can it
k 2025-09-04 03:54 p.m.
Your honor if I may request a side hearing for reconsideration on the objection, wont take long
Ocazius 2025-09-04 03:55 p.m.
What is so pressing about this objection
Ocazius 2025-09-04 03:55 p.m.
Just make your arguments here
OcaziusAnd he will be fined if he chooses to continue in such a manner.
Ian 2025-09-04 03:55 p.m.
Yes, but I was fined first when my conduct was proportionally less inappropriate
Ian 2025-09-04 03:55 p.m.
You can see where I'm going with this
OcaziusWhat is so pressing about this objection
k 2025-09-04 03:55 p.m.
You ruled on a legal conclusion objection correct?
k 2025-09-04 03:55 p.m.
That's what you said his first was
Ocazius 2025-09-04 03:57 p.m.
Witness is a lay witness, not an expert witness. A retainer agreement is an official legal document. Entering into an official legal agreement in an official legal document is a legal action.
k 2025-09-04 03:57 p.m.
What?
k 2025-09-04 03:58 p.m.
the question was a yes or no question, I’m not asking the witness to interpret the law or determine liability. I’m asking whether his firm, as a matter of fact, entered into a retainer agreement with my client. He either did or didn’t, and he has personal knowledge of that fact.
k 2025-09-04 03:59 p.m.
he testified he was the managing partner for his law firm,
k 2025-09-04 03:59 p.m.
he has direct knowledge of the retainer agreements and his entirety of his clients,
k 2025-09-04 03:59 p.m.
its within the scope of testimony
k 2025-09-04 04:00 p.m.
We’re not asking for legal interpretation, just confirmation of a transaction he was responsible for
Ocazius 2025-09-04 04:02 p.m.
Counsel, I hear your argument. Even if he has personal knowledge, ‘enter into a retainer agreement’ is a legal characterization. You are free to ask him whether his firm signed a written contract with your client, whether payment was made, and what the terms were, but the witness won't answer a question framed in terms of whether there was a legal retainer agreement - you're meant to be presenting facts. Please rephrase.
k 2025-09-04 04:02 p.m.
this is not -
Ocazius 2025-09-04 04:02 p.m.
If you wish to appeal the objection ruling, then do so.
Ocazius 2025-09-04 04:02 p.m.
But just use different language...
k 2025-09-04 04:05 p.m.
ok..
k 2025-09-04 04:05 p.m.@Toby You signed a written document with my client, correct?
Ian 2025-09-04 04:06 p.m.
objection
Ian 2025-09-04 04:06 p.m.
lack of foundation, lack of specificity
Ian 2025-09-04 04:06 p.m.@Ocazius
Ian 2025-09-04 04:06 p.m.
Im paying the fine rn Ill send a ss
Ian 2025-09-04 04:07 p.m.
I realized when I joined the game that I forgot to renew my house and in those short few hours it got sniped and now somebody else owns it
Ian 2025-09-04 04:07 p.m.
Im pretty devastated
k 2025-09-04 04:07 p.m.@Ocazius for every objection that is made, I ask you carefully consider it and if it's frivolous
Ian 2025-09-04 04:08 p.m.
It's the same objection I made before just without the legal conclusion part, because that's all that was fixed
Ian 2025-09-04 04:08 p.m.
?
Ian 2025-09-04 04:08 p.m. 
Ocazius 2025-09-04 04:10 p.m.@k As frivolous as you may think the last one was, your current question is the vaguest and most absurd question ever. You cannot simply assume that I know that you are specifically referring to this alleged retainer agreement. Please, at least include a date on your question and then it will be a valid question!
Ocazius 2025-09-04 04:10 p.m.
I understand that this is frustrating but please put more thought into making these questions specific
Ocazius 2025-09-04 04:10 p.m.
This is not a berating, this is a learning moment - always be as specific as possible
Ian 2025-09-04 04:11 p.m.
can I just say
Ian 2025-09-04 04:11 p.m.
Im not being frivolous
OcaziusIan 2025-09-04 04:12 p.m.
lack of foundation too right
k 2025-09-04 04:13 p.m.
no there is no lack of foundation
Ian 2025-09-04 04:13 p.m.
did you mean to say there's no foundation
Ian 2025-09-04 04:13 p.m.
because there isn't
k 2025-09-04 04:15 p.m.@Toby Around early December 2024, your firm prepared a written document regarding legal services for my client, correct?
Ian 2025-09-04 04:16 p.m.
objection
Ian 2025-09-04 04:16 p.m.
lack of foundation
Ian 2025-09-04 04:16 p.m.
and vague
Ian 2025-09-04 04:17 p.m.
a "written document regarding legal services" could be anything. Defendant is a law firm, they literally write "document[s] regarding legal services" for a living
Ian 2025-09-04 04:18 p.m.
also there's no foundation as to the existence of that document whatsoever because it's not been ascertained so there's no foundation
Ocazius 2025-09-04 04:18 p.m.
I shouldn't have to struggle to look back at previous questions and identify what is on the record.
Ocazius 2025-09-04 04:18 p.m.
From now on, all objections and cross talk will be made in <#1413256687405764658>
Ocazius 2025-09-04 04:18 p.m.
Any word in this channel which isn't a question or an answer will make me crash out.
k 2025-09-04 04:18 p.m.@Ocazius we narrow it to december 2024
k 2025-09-04 04:19 p.m.@Toby
k 2025-09-04 04:19 p.m.
As managing partner in December 2024, you oversaw agreements with clients, correct?
kAs managing partner in December 2024, you oversaw agreements with clients, correct?
Toby 2025-09-04 04:19 p.m.
Yes
kToby 2025-09-04 04:19 p.m.
Do I asnwer this
Toby 2025-09-04 04:19 p.m.
*answer
Ian 2025-09-04 04:19 p.m.
No
Ocazius 2025-09-04 04:19 p.m.
No
k 2025-09-04 04:19 p.m.@Toby
k 2025-09-04 04:19 p.m.
One of those clients was my client, kingvictor1000, correct?
Ian 2025-09-04 04:20 p.m.
Objection
Toby 2025-09-04 04:20 p.m.
Were one of what?
Ian 2025-09-04 04:20 p.m.
Lodged in other channel
Ocazius 2025-09-04 04:25 p.m.
Objection for Foundation is Sustained.
Ocazius 2025-09-04 04:25 p.m.
Will I reason why?
Ocazius 2025-09-04 04:25 p.m.
No.
Ocazius 2025-09-04 04:25 p.m.
Counsel is not interested in finding out why or receiving a crash course in establishing foundation.
Ocazius 2025-09-04 04:25 p.m.@k Rephrase.
k 2025-09-04 04:30 p.m.
Rephrasing
Toby 2025-09-04 04:30 p.m.
what happened
k 2025-09-04 04:30 p.m.
Do not blow the channel up
Tobywhat happened
Ian 2025-09-04 04:30 p.m.
Idk
Ocazius 2025-09-04 04:30 p.m.
My attempt to send the monkeys to sleep failed
Ocazius 2025-09-04 04:30 p.m.@k Rephrase.
OcaziusMy attempt to send the monkeys to sleep failed
Toby 2025-09-04 04:31 p.m.@k is black...
Ocazius 2025-09-04 04:31 p.m.
From now on, for an objection to be made, it must be made in one message and the response must consist of one message.
Toby
Ocazius 2025-09-04 04:31 p.m.
Mock racism isn't funny, by the way.
IanOcazius 2025-09-04 04:31 p.m.
You are hereby fined $300 and ordered to pay it to a random person in the next 48 hours, or I will order you to show cause.
Ian 2025-09-04 04:31 p.m.
Ok my bad for the gif your honor
Ocazius 2025-09-04 04:32 p.m.
I am now going to Rudy Giuliani the shit out of this channel. NO SPEAKING WHEN NOT ASKED TO SPEAK.
Ocazius 2025-09-04 04:32 p.m.@vloqsouls Can you assert your authority please
Ocazius 2025-09-04 04:32 p.m.
I literally cannot handle this zoo
vloqsouls 2025-09-04 04:32 p.m.
?order
Dyno Bot2025-09-04 04:32 p.m.
Order!
“Judicial officers are officers of unwavering authority and impartiality.” Minute Order to Hold Defendant in Civil Contempt, at ¶ 1,Kingley Napley v. Adolobee , No. CV-0068-24, (Mayfl. Dist. Ct. Feb. 19 2025) (citing Zrihem, et al. v. TDark99 , 1 Mayfl. ___, ___ (2024) (slip op., at 11) (Cabot, J., dissenting)) (internal quotation marks omitted).
The Court will not tolerate any further disruptions!
“Judicial officers are officers of unwavering authority and impartiality.” Minute Order to Hold Defendant in Civil Contempt, at ¶ 1,
The Court will not tolerate any further disruptions!
k 2025-09-04 04:32 p.m.@Toby Your firm used written contracts for clients seeking legal services, correct?
Ocazius 2025-09-04 04:32 p.m.
That exists???
BotDynoOrder! “Judicial officers are officers of unwavering authority and impartiality.” Minute Order to Hold Defendant in Civil Contempt, at ¶ 1, Kingley Napley v. Adolobee , No. CV-00...
Toby 2025-09-04 04:33 p.m.
so true... so true...
kToby 2025-09-04 04:33 p.m.
depends, because typically no
k 2025-09-04 04:34 p.m.
However in some cases, your firm did use written contracts, correct?
kIan 2025-09-04 04:34 p.m.
Objection
Ian 2025-09-04 04:34 p.m.
Speculation, lack of foundation
k 2025-09-04 04:34 p.m.
Speculation
kHowever in some cases, your firm did use written contracts, correct?
Toby 2025-09-04 04:34 p.m.
I'm not sure what you mean, because we only use contracts for retainers
Toby 2025-09-04 04:34 p.m.
we have an engagement agreement whereby they automatically agree to when they open a ticket, si taht what you mean?
Toby 2025-09-04 04:34 p.m.
*is that
Ian 2025-09-04 04:34 p.m.
Can you not answer that question
Ian 2025-09-04 04:34 p.m.
There’s an objection
Toby 2025-09-04 04:35 p.m.
That felt hostile...
Ian 2025-09-04 04:35 p.m.
I respectfully request
IanSpeculation, lack of foundation
Ian 2025-09-04 04:35 p.m.@Ocazius
Ian 2025-09-04 04:36 p.m.
If sustained the consecutive question and answer should also be stricken bc they’re a follow up established from the foundation of this question
k 2025-09-04 04:36 p.m.
we were getting to establishing the differential
Ocazius 2025-09-04 04:37 p.m.
It's cross-examination, and the witness is being asked something directly in their knowledge. Phrasing is objectionable, but I will overrule the objection, @Toby can confirm or deny or expand.
Ian 2025-09-04 04:37 p.m.
It’s not cross
Ian 2025-09-04 04:37 p.m.
It’s direct examination
Ocazius 2025-09-04 04:37 p.m.
Ok that was terrible wording LOL
Toby 2025-09-04 04:37 p.m.
help
IanIt’s not cross
Ocazius 2025-09-04 04:37 p.m.
I meant
Ocazius 2025-09-04 04:37 p.m.
Direct hostile
OcaziusOk that was terrible wording LOL
Ocazius 2025-09-04 04:37 p.m.
When I said 'phrasing is objectionable', I meant 'questionable'
Ocazius 2025-09-04 04:37 p.m.
Phrasing is not objectionable as I have denied the objection
Toby 2025-09-04 04:37 p.m.
what does that even mean
Ocazius 2025-09-04 04:37 p.m.
It means it's odd
Ocazius 2025-09-04 04:37 p.m.
and I don't like it
Ian 2025-09-04 04:37 p.m.
Ok so
Ian 2025-09-04 04:37 p.m.
Wait so then
Ocazius 2025-09-04 04:38 p.m.@Toby Answer the question.
Ian 2025-09-04 04:38 p.m.
Hostile is overruled
Toby 2025-09-04 04:38 p.m.
I did sis
Ian 2025-09-04 04:38 p.m.
What about foundation and speculation
Ian 2025-09-04 04:38 p.m.
Are those overruled too
Ocazius 2025-09-04 04:38 p.m.
I overruled speculation...?
Ian 2025-09-04 04:38 p.m.
You didn’t specifically name anything
Ocazius 2025-09-04 04:38 p.m.
As for foundation, not much required in my view for that question, ties in with the first claim.
Ian 2025-09-04 04:38 p.m.
I thought you referred to hostile
Ian 2025-09-04 04:39 p.m.
Alr
Ocazius 2025-09-04 04:39 p.m.
I said the witness is hostile
Ocazius 2025-09-04 04:39 p.m.
Apologies for my confusing language
Ocazius 2025-09-04 04:39 p.m.
One too few frappucinos
Toby 2025-09-04 04:39 p.m.@Ocazius some advice, you have discretion (within reason) when ruling on objections, just saying
Ian 2025-09-04 04:39 p.m.
Yea he can
Ocazius 2025-09-04 04:39 p.m.
Ian 2025-09-04 04:39 p.m.
Keep going and stuff
TobyIan 2025-09-04 04:39 p.m.
I almost fainted
k 2025-09-04 04:39 p.m.
Stop typing
Ian 2025-09-04 04:40 p.m.
Toby please don’t say such controversial things that nobody knows about
Ian 2025-09-04 04:40 p.m.
Goodness!
Ocazius 2025-09-04 04:40 p.m.@Toby Witness, I would advise you to stray away from such contentious and disputed topics and suggestions.
Ocazius 2025-09-04 04:40 p.m.@k Next question.
Ocazius 2025-09-04 04:40 p.m.
I will allow the witness' previous response on the record despite it being in the middle of the objection.
Ian 2025-09-04 04:40 p.m.
I believe the witness asked xolaaz to clarify on a question
Toby 2025-09-04 04:40 p.m.
ok
vloqsouls 2025-09-04 04:41 p.m.
What is going onm
Ian 2025-09-04 04:41 p.m.
Im kind of getting lost
Ian 2025-09-04 04:41 p.m.
But
vloqsouls 2025-09-04 04:41 p.m.
on*
vloqsoulsWhat is going onm
Toby 2025-09-04 04:41 p.m.
help idk
Toby 2025-09-04 04:41 p.m.
whos the presiding DCJ
Ocazius 2025-09-04 04:41 p.m.
Someone get me a DCJ who can do the ?order command
Tobywhos the presiding DCJ
Ian 2025-09-04 04:41 p.m.
Oh idk actually
vloqsouls 2025-09-04 04:41 p.m.
This is on Ocazius' docket, he's the presiding judge
k 2025-09-04 04:41 p.m.
Stop typing please
vloqsoulsThis is on Ocazius' docket, he's the presiding judge
Toby 2025-09-04 04:41 p.m.
hes needs supervised
Toby 2025-09-04 04:41 p.m.
thats how mags work
Ocazius 2025-09-04 04:41 p.m.@singhski Can you please instil the fear of the lord in these rambunctious civilians?
Ocazius 2025-09-04 04:42 p.m.
I am struggling to hold in my contempt stick.
k 2025-09-04 04:42 p.m.@Ocazius Can I start asking my questions without the channel being blown up
Ocazius 2025-09-04 04:42 p.m.
You may.
OcaziusIan 2025-09-04 04:42 p.m.
This sentence could’ve been in the bible
Tobyhes needs supervised
vloqsouls 2025-09-04 04:42 p.m.
I'm not his supervising DCJ
Ocazius 2025-09-04 04:42 p.m.
Why don't you stop typing all of you?
vloqsoulsI'm not his supervising DCJ
Toby 2025-09-04 04:42 p.m.
kk
vloqsouls 2025-09-04 04:42 p.m.@Ocazius Please maintain decorum thx
Ocazius 2025-09-04 04:42 p.m.
This case is a clusterfuck as it is
vloqsoulsOcazius 2025-09-04 04:42 p.m.
Not an option
Ocazius 2025-09-04 04:42 p.m.
when somebody is abusing their permissions to avoid muting
Singhski 2025-09-04 04:42 p.m.
Stop speaking, all of you.
Singhski 2025-09-04 04:42 p.m.
Now.
Singhski 2025-09-04 04:43 p.m.
Let me review the record and see if anyone needs to be issued a contempt notice.
IanSinghski 2025-09-04 04:45 p.m.@Ian Why
TobySinghski 2025-09-04 04:45 p.m.@Toby Why
SinghskiToby 2025-09-04 04:45 p.m.
Sorry got too excited
TobySinghski 2025-09-04 04:45 p.m.
Why
Toby 2025-09-04 04:45 p.m.
Sorry got too excited
SinghskiIan 2025-09-04 04:46 p.m.
‘Twas a humorous response to toby’s first humorous comment, I apologize
Singhski Server2025-09-04 04:47 p.m.
Singhski Server2025-09-04 04:47 p.m.
Singhski Server2025-09-04 04:47 p.m.
Singhski Server2025-09-04 04:47 p.m.
Toby 2025-09-04 04:47 p.m.
Can I just say, this whole time I was just spectating
Toby 2025-09-04 04:47 p.m.
I did not take part in anything
Toby 2025-09-04 04:47 p.m.
and answering questions
Singhski 2025-09-04 04:48 p.m.@Ian @Toby The above messages are orders from Magistrate Ocazius you have failed to follow. I'm sure you both know the statutory definition of contempt.
SinghskiToby 2025-09-04 04:49 p.m.
Your Honour, in my belief, I did nothing that wrong other than send gifs, I was just answering questions and spectating, though I apologise for the gifs
Singhski 2025-09-04 04:49 p.m.
I'm going to be lenient this time, however, @Ian I understand Toby is just a witness, if you incite fury within him as the Magistrate pointed out, this is largely on you
SinghskiI'm going to be lenient this time, however, @Ian I understand Toby is just a witness, if you incite fury within him as the Magistrate pointed out, this is largely...
Ian 2025-09-04 04:49 p.m.
That’s not what the magistrate meant
Singhski 2025-09-04 04:49 p.m.
What did he mean
Ian 2025-09-04 04:49 p.m.
Well I objected to some of Xolaaz’s stuff and he didn’t like it
Ocazius 2025-09-04 04:50 p.m.
Witness Toby is fuelling anger between Mr. Xolaaz and Mr. npz_v.
Ian 2025-09-04 04:50 p.m.
In explaining my suggestions, though I honestly did not try to rage bait, Xolaaz became very angry
Ian 2025-09-04 04:50 p.m.
So the magistrate saw it as intentional
Ian 2025-09-04 04:50 p.m.
But it wasnt
Ocazius 2025-09-04 04:50 p.m.
Why they are so susceptible to falling for it, despite being adults, I cannot fathom.
Ian 2025-09-04 04:50 p.m.
Wasnt about the witness entirely tho
OcaziusWitness Toby is fuelling anger between Mr. Xolaaz and Mr. npz_v.
Toby 2025-09-04 04:50 p.m.
I wasn't your Honour, I was answering questions
Toby 2025-09-04 04:50 p.m.
and sent 2 gifs
OcaziusWitness Toby is fuelling anger between Mr. Xolaaz and Mr. npz_v.
Ian 2025-09-04 04:50 p.m.
Uhhh
IanBut it wasnt
Ocazius 2025-09-04 04:50 p.m.
You know what you are doing, don't pretend to be oblivious to your actions.
Ocazius 2025-09-04 04:51 p.m.
I have been incredibly lenient and kind when I should be regularly issuing contempt for your conduct. I have explored avenues separate from contempt such as fines and instructions, for your own benefit , yet I have received no respect or silence, but instead continued mockery of eachother and savagery in my court room.
Singhski 2025-09-04 04:51 p.m.
Yeah next time I will issue a fine
Ocazius 2025-09-04 04:51 p.m.
Fines have been issued, and have not been taken seriously.
OcaziusYou know what you are doing, don't pretend to be oblivious to your actions.
Ian 2025-09-04 04:52 p.m.
Respectfully, no, if anything Xolaaz is ragebaiting me I’ve tried to be completely honest and bona fide throughout the trial
Singhski 2025-09-04 04:52 p.m.@Ocazius DMs
Singhski 2025-09-04 04:52 p.m.
Then I'm considering jail time possibly
Ian 2025-09-04 04:53 p.m.
Are we not considering that xolaaz has been significantly more disrespectful
Ian 2025-09-04 04:53 p.m.
I don’t get why I’m being punished
Ian 2025-09-04 04:53 p.m.
My only mistake was talking too much very often and I’m sure ocazius will agree whereas xolaaz actually called me a retard in open court and many more insults
vloqsouls 2025-09-04 04:54 p.m.
Retard? In this House of God??
OcaziusI have been incredibly lenient and kind when I should be regularly issuing contempt for your conduct. I have explored avenues separate from contempt such as fines and instructions,...
k 2025-09-04 04:54 p.m.
if I may, your honor if opposing counsel is not aware of their conduct and what they are doing, which is so plainly clear to the court and myself, then perhaps he ought to be disqualified and brought up on charges with the bar for incompetency
Singhski 2025-09-04 04:55 p.m.
Well that is just completely inflammatory
Singhski 2025-09-04 04:55 p.m.
Shall I record
Ian 2025-09-04 04:55 p.m. 
k 2025-09-04 04:55 p.m.
Fitting for the scenario.
kif I may, your honor if opposing counsel is not aware of their conduct and what they are doing, which is so plainly clear to the court and myself, then perhaps he ought to be disqu...
Ian 2025-09-04 04:55 p.m.
I’ll admit I love talking
Ian 2025-09-04 04:55 p.m.
I talk too much
Ian 2025-09-04 04:55 p.m.
That’s the extent of my unprofessionalism
Ian 2025-09-04 04:56 p.m.
Yours extends far beyond
k 2025-09-04 04:56 p.m.
Also, see both fines that the great magistrate gave mr npz, all in the span of 15 minutes! @singhski
OcaziusYou are hereby fined $300 and ordered to pay it to a random person in the next 48 hours, or I will order you to show cause.
k 2025-09-04 04:56 p.m.
OcaziusYou are hereby fined $300 and ordered to pay it to a random person in the next 48 hours, or I will order you to show cause.
k 2025-09-04 04:56 p.m.
k 2025-09-04 04:56 p.m.
maybe more then 15..
Ian 2025-09-04 04:57 p.m.
That’s a fallacious argument
k 2025-09-04 04:57 p.m.
I leave it all in your hand, mr singhski.
Ian 2025-09-04 04:58 p.m.
Rather than showing how your behavior isn’t bad and actually showing it in contrast to my actions, you look at how I’ve been (inequitably) punished and you haven’t
Ian 2025-09-04 04:58 p.m.
I already showed you did much worse
Ian 2025-09-04 04:58 p.m.
It’s just that they come in a form that is harder to spot because you don’t talk as much as me
Singhski 2025-09-04 04:58 p.m.
Are you really going to argue RIGHT NOW
Ian 2025-09-04 04:58 p.m.
I’ll shut up
Ian 2025-09-04 04:59 p.m.
Second fine paid
Singhski 2025-09-04 04:59 p.m.
There will be sanctions for all of you, I'm liaising with the Chief Judge because I don't expect the punishment to be considered orthodox(edited)
vloqsouls 2025-09-04 04:59 p.m.
Can I have some input too considering I watched this go down first hand?
Singhski 2025-09-04 05:07 p.m.@ColonelCarm
Ian 2025-09-04 05:10 p.m.
Do you think toby could continue testifying @singhski this case has already elapsed more than 6 months
Ian 2025-09-04 05:10 p.m.
It’s ok if no
Ocazius 2025-09-05 11:26 a.m.@singhski
Ocazius 2025-09-07 03:34 p.m.@k Continue questioning in the meantime
k 2025-09-08 08:58 p.m.
will try to resume where ever we left off
kwill try to resume where ever we left off
Ocazius 2025-09-09 11:21 a.m.
Must be one hell of a task to take almost 48 hours...
OcaziusMust be one hell of a task to take almost 48 hours...
k 2025-09-09 12:44 p.m.
Well i’m given short notice to continue questioning after we’re waiting for singhski’s order
Ocazius 2025-09-09 12:48 p.m.
Is this a joke?
Ocazius 2025-09-09 12:49 p.m.
Are you going to continue sending random messages and then just not doing asking questions when you are clearly online?
Ian 2025-09-09 12:58 p.m.@Ocazius need I say anything
OcaziusAre you going to continue sending random messages and then just not doing asking questions when you are clearly online?
k 2025-09-09 05:29 p.m.
"clearly online"
k 2025-09-09 05:29 p.m.
my status has not changed at all in the last 5 years of me being on this app
k 2025-09-09 05:29 p.m.
even when I am dead i will stil be on do not disturb
Ian 2025-09-09 05:31 p.m.
dude just ask your questions
Ian 2025-09-09 05:31 p.m.@k
Ian 2025-09-09 05:31 p.m.
we've been waiting
k 2025-09-09 05:31 p.m.
yeah I am writing my questions now if you don't mind waiting 2 minutes
k 2025-09-09 05:31 p.m.
unless you cant
Ian 2025-09-09 05:32 p.m.
it's been two minutes and the typing indicator wasn't on, so forgive me for assuming that you said that and went away, like you've done so many times
Ian 2025-09-09 05:32 p.m.
just ask your question Im waiting
k 2025-09-09 05:37 p.m.@Toby lets take a look at this document (exhibit B in plaintiff's discovery) https://docs.google.com/document/d/1TbYSJJV5qjmNpKqHG5PVP3YzQxQ9S1QvHxFVzeyhYdU/edit?tab=t.0 RETAINER AGREEMENT This Retainer Agreement ("Agreement") is made between Kingley Napley ("the Firm") and the Ultimate Fighting of Columbia ("the Client"). The terms of this Agreement are as follows: Term and Renewal This Agreement shall be in effect for a period of two (2) months from the date s... 
k 2025-09-09 05:38 p.m.
do you recognize this document?
k"clearly online"
Ocazius 2025-09-10 05:38 a.m.
Yes, you are clearly online if you’ve sent me a message. I am struggling to grasp how you only have time to send a message complaining about short notice but can’t use the same 30 second period it took you to write that, to ask a question instead.
Ocazius 2025-09-10 05:38 a.m.
You didn’t even accompany it with a question
Ocazius 2025-09-10 05:38 a.m.
But thanks for your latest question.
Ian 2025-09-10 06:21 a.m.@Toby
Ian 2025-09-10 06:21 a.m.@Toby
kdo you recognize this document?
Toby 2025-09-10 06:55 a.m.
Yes
Ian 2025-09-10 05:52 p.m.@k
Ian 2025-09-10 05:52 p.m.
You’re not on dnd which is weird because I thought you were always on dnd
Ian 2025-09-10 05:53 p.m.
But can you ask your next question
Ian 2025-09-10 08:32 p.m.@Ocazius
Ian 2025-09-10 08:33 p.m.
he's online again and no questions
Ianhe's online again and no questions
k 2025-09-10 09:03 p.m.
Wasn’t aware you took away my 24 window from when the window responses are
k 2025-09-10 09:03 p.m.
You can keep crying to the judge, but still i was not online.
kmy status has not changed at all in the last 5 years of me being on this app
Ian 2025-09-10 09:27 p.m. 
kYou can keep crying to the judge, but still i was not online.
Ian 2025-09-10 09:27 p.m.
Okay you’re clearly here can you ask the question???
k 2025-09-11 12:45 p.m.@Toby does exhibit b contain your law firms name?
kToby 2025-09-11 12:54 p.m.
Yes
Toby 2025-09-11 12:54 p.m.
But can we fr stop taking so long
Ian 2025-09-11 12:57 p.m.@k we’re all here
Ian 2025-09-11 12:57 p.m.
For the first time
Ian 2025-09-11 12:57 p.m.
It’s amazing
Ian 2025-09-11 12:57 p.m.
Please keep asking the questions let’s not waste it
k 2025-09-11 10:27 p.m.@Toby does exhibit b also bear my clients name, kingvictor1000?
Ian 2025-09-11 10:27 p.m.
No objection
kToby 2025-09-12 03:08 a.m.
Yes
Nicklaus used /add
clerkFlow Bot2025-09-13 10:12 p.m. @Nicklaus has added @Ian to the case channel.
Case Modified
Ocazius 2025-09-14 03:50 a.m.
Stop getting banned bro
Ian 2025-09-14 08:17 a.m.@Ocazius can I move to dismiss for want of prosecution?
Ian 2025-09-14 08:18 a.m.
He’s done this three times now and every time he lied and made up a verifiably false excuse
Ian 2025-09-14 08:18 a.m.
He doesn’t even have a single exhibit admitted into evidence by now, at this rate we’ll finish in february
Ocazius 2025-09-14 08:42 a.m.
According to FRCP 7 (b) (1), you can technically motion for a gender change surgery
Ocazius 2025-09-14 08:42 a.m.
move for whatever you want, but for something like this, do it in writing
Ocazius 2025-09-14 08:42 a.m.
if youd please
Ocazius 2025-09-14 08:43 a.m.@k Out of interest, can I please hear the latest excuse?
Ocaziusmove for whatever you want, but for something like this, do it in writing
Ian 2025-09-14 10:12 a.m.
It’s probably best if it’s “sua sponte”
Ian 2025-09-14 10:13 a.m.
Not really because I asked for it but it’s typically the court that dismisses a case for want of prosecution mid-trial, not by motion
Ocaziusk 2025-09-14 12:33 p.m.
My family is having severe medical issues and i don’t really check the app during times of stress
k 2025-09-14 12:33 p.m.
I’ll do my best to resume
Ian 2025-09-14 01:14 p.m.
An excuse that breeds sympathy is the best one because it can’t be pleasantly scrutinized
Ian 2025-09-14 01:15 p.m.
It can still be scrutinized though
Ian 2025-09-14 01:16 p.m.
You’ve deliberately lied (really there is no other way to put it) to the court before on several occasions
Ian 2025-09-14 01:16 p.m.
If it truly is your situation, I’m sorry for you, but I just don’t think the judge can be expected to believe you
Ian 2025-09-14 01:17 p.m.@Ocazius I urge you to be pragmatic and not leave dismissal off the table
k 2025-09-14 01:47 p.m.
He’s doubting that i am having a family emergency
k 2025-09-14 01:47 p.m.
I won’t be wishing any prayers for you
k 2025-09-14 01:47 p.m.
Also insinuating i lied to the court (when i never was proven wrong)
k 2025-09-14 01:47 p.m.
(Also never held in contempt or issued any fines)
k 2025-09-14 02:14 p.m.@Toby Exhibit B contains signatures from both the defendant and plaintiff, correct?
Toby 2025-09-14 02:35 p.m.
No
kHe’s doubting that i am having a family emergency
Ian 2025-09-14 02:55 p.m.
Yes quite explicitly
kAlso insinuating i lied to the court (when i never was proven wrong)
Ian 2025-09-14 02:55 p.m.
You were proven wrong
Ian 2025-09-14 02:56 p.m.
You contended that you are “always on dnd” and that you never change your status as an excuse for not replying whilst you appeared online
Ian 2025-09-14 02:56 p.m.
And yet …
Ian 2025-09-14 02:56 p.m.@Ocazius
Ian 2025-09-14 02:57 p.m.
That photo was taken one minute ago by the way but when I pointed it out originally I also took one and sent it here
TobyNo
k 2025-09-14 06:51 p.m.@Toby Exhibit B specifies a payment of $50,000, correct?
honkhonk 2025-09-18 03:44 a.m.
Ehem, it would appear one of the parties is missing ?
kToby 2025-09-18 04:38 a.m.
Yea
honkhonkEhem, it would appear one of the parties is missing ?
Toby 2025-09-18 04:38 a.m.
Oop
TobyYea
k 2025-09-18 12:40 p.m.
Thank you for your timely response
kThank you for your timely response
Toby 2025-09-18 01:35 p.m.
Youre one to talk
Ocazius used /add
clerkFlow Bot2025-09-18 02:53 p.m. @Ocazius has added @mantisshrimp69 to the case channel.
Case Modified
kThank you for your timely response
Ocazius 2025-09-18 03:24 p.m.
See I fail to understand how instead of saying 'Thank you for your timely response', you didn't choose to use that time to ask another question
Ocazius 2025-09-18 03:24 p.m.
and you still haven't
Ocazius 2025-09-18 03:24 p.m.
why didn't you just send it whilst you were there
Ocazius 2025-09-18 03:24 p.m.
bro used up his daily six words
mantisshrimp69 2025-09-18 03:40 p.m.@Ocazius
mantisshrimp69 2025-09-18 03:40 p.m.
can I please have dismissal
mantisshrimp69 2025-09-18 03:42 p.m.
this court often accepts paperless motions for dismissal for failure to prosecute when it's very evident that the plaintiff is being very negligent in their pursuing of the case
spedvictor 2025-09-18 03:43 p.m.
Sorry but let me interject after class
mantisshrimp69 2025-09-18 03:43 p.m. 
mantisshrimp69 2025-09-18 03:43 p.m.
this is a case just a few days ago @Ocazius
mantisshrimp69 2025-09-18 03:43 p.m.
it's simply unacceptable how plaintiff is pursuing this case
mantisshrimp69 2025-09-18 03:44 p.m.
it's been going on for months and he CONTINUALLY misses deadlines, deliberately lies to the court, and doesn't ask questions when he is told to
mantisshrimp69 2025-09-18 03:44 p.m.
the court should consider my position
OcaziusSee I fail to understand how instead of saying 'Thank you for your timely response', you didn't choose to use that time to ask another question
k 2025-09-18 03:56 p.m.
Because i was moving periods in between this thing called school
Ocazius 2025-09-18 03:56 p.m.
I see
mantisshrimp69this is a case just a few days ago @Ocazius
k 2025-09-18 03:56 p.m.
Yeah u like the dismissal with prejudice?
Ocazius 2025-09-18 03:56 p.m.
Will you ask a question now?
k 2025-09-18 03:56 p.m.
Yes.
Ocazius 2025-09-18 03:57 p.m.
Yipee
mantisshrimp69this is a case just a few days ago @Ocazius
k 2025-09-18 03:57 p.m.
It’s amazing how there’s a differential between one judge and another judge
Ocazius 2025-09-18 03:57 p.m.
Yeah shut up stop responding to him
k 2025-09-18 03:57 p.m.
Yea idk why i bother
k 2025-09-18 03:57 p.m.
Let me ask my question
Ocazius 2025-09-18 03:57 p.m.
No one is stopping you
Ocazius 2025-09-18 03:57 p.m.
Js don't get distracted by opposing counsels past comments
k 2025-09-18 03:59 p.m.@Toby Does exhibit b provide for a period of two months of legal services?
kmantisshrimp69 2025-09-18 04:00 p.m.
objection for lack of specificity
mantisshrimp69 2025-09-18 04:00 p.m.
also objection on the subsequent answer therefor
mantisshrimp69 2025-09-18 04:00 p.m.
(timely asserted, see https://discord.com/channels/1274202187911790632/1274202189149114407/1416928494427967508)
kmantisshrimp69 2025-09-18 04:01 p.m.
Objection, legal conclusions
mantisshrimp69 2025-09-18 04:01 p.m.
he should instead ask "does exhibit B read that X party will provide legal services..." etc
mantisshrimp69 2025-09-18 04:01 p.m.
not whether it "provides" for something
mantisshrimp69 2025-09-18 04:01 p.m.
because thats a conclusion
mantisshrimp69 2025-09-18 04:01 p.m.
also Id like my motion considered @Ocazius
k 2025-09-18 04:02 p.m.
Reading terms on a document is not a conclusion
mantisshrimp69 2025-09-18 04:02 p.m.
youre not asking to read terms
mantisshrimp69 2025-09-18 04:02 p.m.
asking to read terms would be "does the contract say THIS?"
k 2025-09-18 04:02 p.m.
Ok one sec
mantisshrimp69 2025-09-18 04:02 p.m.
you instead ask "does the contract provide X?" essentially asking if its entered into
mantisshrimp69 2025-09-18 04:02 p.m.
that way
k 2025-09-18 04:03 p.m.
no
k 2025-09-18 04:05 p.m.@Ocazius rule please
mantisshrimp69also Id like my motion considered @Ocazius
k 2025-09-18 04:05 p.m.
Make a paper motion
k 2025-09-18 04:05 p.m.
Also witness took 4 days to respond to the question. Not my fault!
kMake a paper motion
mantisshrimp69 2025-09-18 04:07 p.m.
No
mantisshrimp69 2025-09-18 04:07 p.m.
unless the judge needs me to
mantisshrimp69 2025-09-18 04:07 p.m.
but generally it's not required
kAlso witness took 4 days to respond to the question. Not my fault!
mantisshrimp69 2025-09-18 04:07 p.m.
yeah one time
k 2025-09-18 04:07 p.m.
Typically it’s good faith to have motions on record
mantisshrimp69 2025-09-18 04:07 p.m.
you failed to respond for days on end like 15 times
mantisshrimp69 2025-09-18 04:07 p.m.
since you began
k 2025-09-18 04:08 p.m.
So your just recycling up old arguments that were already addressed by the judge
k 2025-09-18 04:08 p.m.
Ok.
kTypically it’s good faith to have motions on record
mantisshrimp69 2025-09-18 04:08 p.m.
whether a motion is paperless or not is not indicative of whether it's in good faith or not
kSo your just recycling up old arguments that were already addressed by the judge
mantisshrimp69 2025-09-18 04:08 p.m.
?
mantisshrimp69 2025-09-18 04:08 p.m.
lol what
k 2025-09-18 04:08 p.m.
You already addressed what you just said
k 2025-09-18 04:09 p.m.
but now you recycle it whenever the witness takes 4 days to respond
k 2025-09-18 04:09 p.m.
Also it’s standard practice to make motions on paper concerning the integrity of a case.
kbut now you recycle it whenever the witness takes 4 days to respond
mantisshrimp69 2025-09-18 04:43 p.m.
no I'm 'recycling' it because I just got added to the channel
mantisshrimp69 2025-09-18 04:43 p.m.
?
mantisshrimp69 2025-09-18 06:30 p.m.@Ocazius pending rulings; two objections lodged ([lack of specificity](https://discord.com/channels/1274202187911790632/1346251775551996056/1418325799748239680), [legal conclusions](https://discord.com/channels/1274202187911790632/1346251775551996056/1418325978983432334)), and motion to dismiss for want of prosecution
k 2025-09-18 06:33 p.m.
do you know what want of prosecution is
k 2025-09-18 06:34 p.m.
you've been claiming it since this trial has started (denied every time)
mantisshrimp69 2025-09-18 06:35 p.m.
when this trial started, I didnt work at clifford chance
mantisshrimp69 2025-09-18 06:35 p.m.
and it's never been denied
Iank 2025-09-18 06:35 p.m.
k 2025-09-18 06:35 p.m.
not accepted, like i said earlier
k 2025-09-18 06:36 p.m.
(paper motions)
mantisshrimp69 2025-09-18 06:36 p.m. 
mantisshrimp69 2025-09-18 06:36 p.m.
was not accepted because he asked to put it to paper
mantisshrimp69 2025-09-18 06:36 p.m.
he didn't deny it
k 2025-09-18 06:36 p.m.
did you put it into paper?
mantisshrimp69 2025-09-18 06:36 p.m.
no, I explained the reason
k 2025-09-18 06:36 p.m.
oh okay so it wasn't accepted
k 2025-09-18 06:36 p.m.
orally
mantisshrimp69 2025-09-18 06:36 p.m.
I explained the reason why it wasn't put into paper
mantisshrimp69 2025-09-18 06:36 p.m.
and we're waiting on him
mantisshrimp69 2025-09-18 06:36 p.m.
why are you mini-modding me
k 2025-09-18 06:37 p.m.
because ur making egregious claims of dismissal when you cant even type out a paper motion
k 2025-09-18 06:37 p.m.
all of your requests are oral and nothing put into paper
k 2025-09-18 06:37 p.m.
(the judge requested paper motions)
mantisshrimp69 2025-09-18 06:38 p.m.
1. My claims are not egregious. You are incapable of properly prosecuting a case and this is on you, not me.
2. I don't type out a paper motion because I don't have to. I explained my reasoning, and we're waiting on the judge to decide on its sufficiency.
2. I don't type out a paper motion because I don't have to. I explained my reasoning, and we're waiting on the judge to decide on its sufficiency.
k 2025-09-18 06:38 p.m.
You don't have to obey the courts rules?
k 2025-09-18 06:38 p.m.
Pretty sure he said dismissals need to be put into writing.
mantisshrimp69 2025-09-18 06:38 p.m.
The judge did request a paper motion. I explained why I thought it wasn't needed. He, still, hasn't ruled.
mantisshrimp69 2025-09-18 06:38 p.m.
So you should shut up
k 2025-09-18 06:38 p.m.
Interesting.
mantisshrimp69 2025-09-18 06:39 p.m.
You only talk when it's to criticize
mantisshrimp69 2025-09-18 06:39 p.m.
never to ask questions
mantisshrimp69So you should shut up
k 2025-09-18 06:39 p.m.
Wow excuse me?
k 2025-09-18 06:39 p.m.@Ocazius I move for sanctions of a fine or contempt of court, the offender was told by the honorable singhski not to openly disrespect members of the court or of the opposing party. If you need a paper motion I'm more then happy to write one!
k 2025-09-18 06:39 p.m.
Furthermore,
mantisshrimp69 2025-09-18 06:39 p.m.
am I the one who's disrespectful?
k 2025-09-18 06:40 p.m.
Singhski addressed you, you were fined two times!
k 2025-09-18 06:40 p.m.
Unbelievable.
mantisshrimp69 2025-09-18 06:40 p.m.
I think my dog does a better job of ragebaiting
kFurthermore,
k 2025-09-18 06:41 p.m.
Furthermore, we request disqualification of counsel. Counsel has failed to obey this courts rules and even a honorary district court judge. This is a repeat action, at this point it's redundant.
mantisshrimp69 2025-09-18 06:41 p.m.
Disqualification of counsel only applies for conflicts of interest in civil cases
mantisshrimp69 2025-09-18 06:41 p.m.
But okay
kFurthermore, we request disqualification of counsel. Counsel has failed to obey this courts rules and even a honorary district court judge. This is a repeat action, at this point i...
mantisshrimp69 2025-09-18 06:43 p.m.
also Im not counsel
mantisshrimp69 2025-09-18 06:43 p.m.
Im the defendant in this case
mantisshrimp69 2025-09-18 06:43 p.m.
Im pro se
mantisshrimp69 2025-09-18 06:43 p.m.
how are you this clueless about a case you're lead counsel for
k 2025-09-18 06:43 p.m.
Okay! We move for sanctions! Contempt of court - misdemeanor please! @Ocazius
k 2025-09-18 06:43 p.m.
I'll await your ruling and stop typing.
mantisshrimp69 2025-09-18 06:47 p.m.
fun fact contempt of court is a sui generis offense
mantisshrimp69 2025-09-18 06:47 p.m.
so it's only an actual misdemeanor to the extent it practically requires that definition for efficient codification in our state code
mantisshrimp69 2025-09-18 06:48 p.m.
but other states that don't need that don't classify it
mantisshrimp69 2025-09-18 06:48 p.m.
the more you know
mantisshrimp69 2025-09-18 07:01 p.m.
so
mantisshrimp69 2025-09-18 07:02 p.m.@Ocazius pending rulings; two objections lodged ([lack of specificity](https://discord.com/channels/1274202187911790632/1346251775551996056/1418325799748239680), [legal conclusions](https://discord.com/channels/1274202187911790632/1346251775551996056/1418325978983432334)), motion to dismiss for want of prosecution, [motion for sanctions](https://discord.com/channels/1274202187911790632/1346251775551996056/1418365899324260413), and [motion to disqualify](https://discord.com/channels/1274202187911790632/1346251775551996056/1418366261787754599)
Ocazius 2025-09-19 01:53 p.m.
Ocazius 2025-09-19 02:04 p.m.
Neither of you need to motion for sanctions against each other
OcaziusNeither of you need to motion for sanctions against each other
mantisshrimp69 2025-09-19 02:40 p.m.
I didn’t
mantisshrimp69 2025-09-19 02:41 p.m.
I have a motion for dismissal (I was hoping you’d allow it paperless, and I explained why)
mantisshrimp69 2025-09-19 02:41 p.m.
Also two objections
mantisshrimp69 2025-09-19 02:41 p.m.
And plaintiff moved to disqualify me as counsel (even though I’m not an attorney here…I’m the defendant)
mantisshrimp69 2025-09-20 01:24 p.m.@Ocazius
Ocazius 2025-09-20 01:56 p.m.
Before I rule on any motions or disqualifications, I am writing a report to the Chief Judge.
mantisshrimp69 2025-09-20 02:04 p.m.
Alright
Ocazius 2025-09-22 11:39 a.m.
Alrighty
Ocazius 2025-09-22 11:39 a.m.
I'm dismissing any dismissal motions as well as disqualification motions.
Ocazius 2025-09-22 11:39 a.m.
This havoc will continue no longer.
Ocazius 2025-09-22 11:40 a.m.
Testimony will continue, however the next person to begin an argument, speak excessively out of line, insult the other party, or engage in other conduct that I have previously stamped against, will be held in criminal contempt, face a $100,000 fine and be sent to jail for an hour. If a counsel takes more than 36 hours between an answer and a question, I will consider dismissal/disqualification motions.(edited)
mantisshrimp69objection for lack of specificity
Ocazius 2025-09-22 11:41 a.m.
Overruled.
mantisshrimp69Objection, legal conclusions
Ocazius 2025-09-22 11:41 a.m.
Sustained.
Ocazius 2025-09-22 11:41 a.m.@k Continue.
Ocaziusmantisshrimp69 2025-09-22 11:43 a.m.
He’d need to rephrase
mantisshrimp69 2025-09-22 11:43 a.m.
Correct?
Ocazius 2025-09-22 11:45 a.m.
If he would like to ask another question on the same line, correct.
mantisshrimp69 2025-09-22 11:45 a.m.
Alright
k 2025-09-23 08:33 p.m.@Toby In Exhibit B, what length of time is listed for the legal services?
mantisshrimp69 2025-09-23 09:09 p.m.
Objection—lack of specificity
mantisshrimp69 2025-09-23 09:09 p.m.@Ocazius
mantisshrimp69 2025-09-23 09:10 p.m.
should ask "what amount of money is written in line X?"
mantisshrimp69 2025-09-23 09:10 p.m.
length of time* not amount of money
mantisshrimp69 2025-09-23 09:11 p.m.
what does he mean by listed? does he mean something implied, expressed... just ask a more objective question
Ocazius 2025-09-24 02:16 a.m.
Overruled
Ocazius 2025-09-24 02:16 a.m.@Toby
kToby 2025-09-24 04:10 a.m.
2 months
mantisshrimp69 2025-09-25 04:57 p.m.@Ocazius
mantisshrimp69 2025-09-25 09:05 p.m.@k
Toby 2025-09-27 09:09 a.m.
Dismissal speed run
mantisshrimp69 2025-09-27 09:16 a.m.@Ocazius please
Ocazius 2025-09-27 09:41 a.m.
I think he was just appointed AG
OcaziusI think he was just appointed AG
mantisshrimp69 2025-09-27 09:49 a.m.
He was solicitor general before this remember
mantisshrimp69 2025-09-27 09:49 a.m.
We went over it
mantisshrimp69 2025-09-27 09:50 a.m.
He says he informed his client about the risk and DOJ doesn’t care, what’s the difference
mantisshrimp69 2025-09-27 09:50 a.m.
Please dismiss this case it’s been going on since before I even practiced in clark
mantisshrimp69 2025-09-27 09:50 a.m.
It’s insane
mantisshrimp69 2025-09-27 09:51 a.m.
His continued failure to exhibit even an infinitesimally minuscule shred of diligence is unfairly prejudicing me to an unbelievable extent
Ocazius 2025-09-27 10:27 a.m.@spedvictor Hello Plaintiff
Ocazius 2025-09-27 10:27 a.m.
I will make a papered ruling, however I will be disqualifying your counsel from the case.
Ocazius 2025-09-27 10:28 a.m.
Please seek new counsel, or let me know if you'd like to proceed pro se. I will allow you until I make the ruling to find counsel if you want to switch him out instead of his disqualification, or until 48 hours after my ruling. Please let me know if you require any extensions.
mantisshrimp69 2025-09-27 10:28 a.m.
Come on…that only benefits the plaintiff
mantisshrimp69 2025-09-27 10:29 a.m.
Not the defendant who has had their ass dragged to court uselessly for the last 6 months
Ocazius 2025-09-27 10:29 a.m.
The defendant is a law firm, which does not have an ass.
mantisshrimp69 2025-09-27 10:30 a.m.
The defendant is me
mantisshrimp69 2025-09-27 10:30 a.m.
No one else works at clifford chance because it doesn’t exist anymore
mantisshrimp69The defendant is me
Ocazius 2025-09-27 10:30 a.m.
You have not been the defendant for six months...
mantisshrimp69 2025-09-27 10:30 a.m.
I’ve been the defendant for a while, though
Ocazius 2025-09-27 10:31 a.m.
And your ass has not been dragged to court, you've sat behind a computer screen flicking tabs
Ocazius 2025-09-27 10:31 a.m.
You can file a dismissal motion if you feel its necessary
Ocazius 2025-09-27 10:31 a.m.
I will rule on the disqualification later when I regain motivation.
mantisshrimp69 2025-09-27 10:31 a.m.
I will file a motion to dismiss within 24 hours
Ocazius 2025-09-27 10:31 a.m.
I don't know why you say this stuff
Ocazius 2025-09-27 10:32 a.m.
are you going to beat yourself with a whip if you don't file it within 24 hours or something
Ocazius 2025-09-27 10:32 a.m.
you don't need to tell me your own personal timeframes lol
mantisshrimp69 2025-09-27 10:35 a.m.
If you were thinking of doing something in 48 hours
mantisshrimp69 2025-09-27 10:35 a.m.
And I tell you I’ll file within 24
mantisshrimp69 2025-09-27 10:35 a.m.
You might wait to hear what I say
mantisshrimp69 2025-09-27 10:35 a.m.
But if I don’t specify when I’ll file and it could take 6 days for all you know you might just do that then
mantisshrimp69 2025-09-27 10:36 a.m.
To answer your question; yes
Toby 2025-09-27 11:59 a.m.@Ocazius dawg just dismiss. The plaintiff's counsel collectively have had so many chances to present their case, and on multiple occasions have failed to do so in a timely manner, it needs to be dismissed for want of prosecution. I've been on the stand for months now, this is genuinely ridiculous
mantisshrimp69 2025-09-27 12:00 p.m.
^
Ocazius 2025-09-27 12:14 p.m.
I'm not going to respond to this. I have already told you to file if you want to file. I am not making the decision to dismiss a case for want of prosecution unless it is displayed to me that the Plaintiff is not interested in proceeding with this case. Faulty counsel does not count. Furthermore, I am nhot your 'dawg'.
Ocazius 2025-09-27 12:14 p.m.
Also shut up
OcaziusPlease seek new counsel, or let me know if you'd like to proceed pro se. I will allow you until I make the ruling to find counsel if you want to switch him out instead of his disqu...
spedvictor 2025-09-27 07:40 p.m.
Understood, I am currently searching for new counsel.
mantisshrimp69 2025-09-28 12:30 p.m.DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO DISMISS FOR WANT OF PROSECUTION
@Ocazius @spedvictor @Toby
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1bcEM9grb5ifaQ4vHD1sCT8CWnEQU7-b9/view?usp=sharing
mantisshrimp69 2025-09-28 12:30 p.m.
I submitted a little bit later than expected, my apologies
mantisshrimp69I submitted a little bit later than expected, my apologies
Ocazius 2025-09-28 12:30 p.m.
I expect a self whipping
Ocazius 2025-09-28 12:30 p.m.
as you previously pledged to carry out
mantisshrimp69 2025-09-28 12:31 p.m.
I've already carried it out, your honor, right before submitting
Ocazius 2025-09-28 12:32 p.m.
Good lad
Ocazius 2025-09-28 12:32 p.m.@spedvictor How's attorney hunting going
Ocazius 2025-09-28 12:32 p.m.
I remind you that if you don't find a replacement within the timeframe which is rapidly approaching, I will not be granting extensions.
Ocaziusspedvictor 2025-09-28 01:19 p.m.
Open season still but if it comes down to it I’ll just do the questioning myself
mantisshrimp69 2025-09-28 02:16 p.m.@Ocazius when can we expect ruling on MTD
mantisshrimp69Ocazius 2025-09-28 02:20 p.m.
Plaintiff has now reached 24 hours left to find counsel. Once he does so, a 48 hour response timer will begin. if he doesn't succceed, I will still impose the same 48 hour response timer.
OcaziusPlaintiff has now reached 24 hours left to find counsel. Once he does so, a 48 hour response timer will begin. if he doesn't succceed, I will still impose the same 48 hour response...
mantisshrimp69 2025-09-28 02:41 p.m.
Okay
mantisshrimp69 2025-09-28 02:41 p.m.
When can we expect a ruling on the MTD
Ocazius 2025-09-28 02:45 p.m.
After that bud
OcaziusAfter that bud
mantisshrimp69 2025-09-28 02:56 p.m.
So you want the plaintiff to look for counsel first so that he can have a lawyer for when the case is dismissed?
mantisshrimp69 2025-09-28 02:56 p.m.
Wouldn’t it make more sense to rule now on the MTD
mantisshrimp69So you want the plaintiff to look for counsel first so that he can have a lawyer for when the case is dismissed?
Ocazius 2025-09-28 03:03 p.m.
No, I want Plaintiff to look for counsel so that he can have a lawyer to write a blooming response to the motion
Ocazius 2025-09-28 03:03 p.m.
What is so hard about this to understand
OcaziusNo, I want Plaintiff to look for counsel so that he can have a lawyer to write a blooming response to the motion
mantisshrimp69 2025-09-28 03:12 p.m.
Ok
mantisshrimp69 2025-09-28 03:13 p.m.
I can accurately predict for you though what the response, if any, will say
mantisshrimp69 2025-09-28 03:13 p.m.
It will say that xolaaz’ incompetence is inexcusable but it’s not the plaintiff’s fault and he should still get a chance to pursue this with adequate counsel
mantisshrimp69 2025-09-28 03:15 p.m.
And it will be BS because xolaaz didn’t deceive plaintiff. Plaintiff knew the case was going extremely slowly (obviously) and that his counsel was being the opposite of diligent—in light of this, he continued with the same attorney and didn’t get a new one
mantisshrimp69 2025-09-28 03:18 p.m.
The issues here are only of fact (because, obviously, the law as to courts’ power to dismiss for want of prosecution are axiomatic). And, being that you already know the facts because you’ve been presiding over the allegations this entire time, you shouldn’t need a response
mantisshrimp69 2025-09-28 03:18 p.m.
This is an action that you can take sua sponte, the only reason it’s a motion is that you requested it, but there’s no need for anything further
mantisshrimp69 2025-09-28 03:24 p.m.@Toby
Ocazius 2025-09-28 03:25 p.m.
Could I just ask something, out of sheer and utmost curiosity
Ocazius 2025-09-28 03:26 p.m.
What could you have possibly thought was the point in sending the above 'prediction'
Ocazius 2025-09-28 03:26 p.m.
Next time, please save yourself the time of writing it and myself the time of reading it
mantisshrimp69 2025-09-28 03:27 p.m.
I was telling you a response isn’t needed
Ocazius 2025-09-28 03:27 p.m.
Because it's quite odd to be arguing hypothetical points from an opposing side by yourself and then telling yourself that your hypothetical argument is BS and then counterarguing with yourself
mantisshrimp69I was telling you a response isn’t needed
Ocazius 2025-09-28 03:27 p.m.
Really
Ocazius 2025-09-28 03:27 p.m.
You really expect me to waive the Plaintiff's right to a response
Ocazius 2025-09-28 03:27 p.m.
Because you know exactly what they are going to say, which are invalid points in your mind?
Ocazius 2025-09-28 03:27 p.m.
OcaziusYou really expect me to waive the Plaintiff's right to a response
mantisshrimp69 2025-09-28 03:27 p.m.
Yes, because a motion wasn’t needed in the first place
mantisshrimp69 2025-09-28 03:27 p.m.
It could’ve been sue sponte
mantisshrimp69 2025-09-28 03:27 p.m.
Sua sponte*
mantisshrimp69 2025-09-28 03:27 p.m.
it should’ve been actually
Ocazius 2025-09-28 03:28 p.m.
Would you like to withdraw your written motion and move orally for a dismissal for want of prosecution?
Ocazius 2025-09-28 03:28 p.m.
Feel free to do so.
OcaziusWould you like to withdraw your written motion and move orally for a dismissal for want of prosecution?
mantisshrimp69 2025-09-28 03:30 p.m.
I already did that
mantisshrimp69 2025-09-28 03:31 p.m.
You told me to file a written one
mantisshrimp69Please dismiss this case it’s been going on since before I even practiced in clark
mantisshrimp69 2025-09-28 03:31 p.m.
Oral motion
OcaziusYou can file a dismissal motion if you feel its necessary
mantisshrimp69 2025-09-28 03:31 p.m.
You telling me to file written
Ocazius 2025-09-28 03:33 p.m.
I know exactly what I told you to do, and now I've just told you that you can withdraw whatever you want and submit an oral motion instead. You have free will son.
mantisshrimp69 2025-09-28 03:35 p.m.
Okay thank you for telling me that I have free will
mantisshrimp69 2025-09-28 03:35 p.m.
That’s immaterial here though
mantisshrimp69 2025-09-28 03:35 p.m.
You don’t need a response
Ocazius 2025-09-28 03:38 p.m.
Thanks for your much requested opinion
Ocazius 2025-09-28 03:39 p.m.
I shall also let parties know that prior to my dismissal ruling, will come my sanctions ruling on Mr. Xolaaz and Mr. npz_v.
Ocazius 2025-09-28 03:39 p.m.
Coordinated with the higher beings
mantisshrimp69 2025-09-28 03:41 p.m.
Is that seriously still going on
mantisshrimp69 2025-09-28 03:41 p.m.
All I did was speak too much or speak out of turn sometimes
mantisshrimp69 2025-09-28 03:41 p.m.
I was fined twice for it
mantisshrimp69 2025-09-28 03:41 p.m.
Meanwhile xolaaz called me a retard and insulted me like 5 other times why am I still the one who’s up for sanctions
Ocazius 2025-09-28 03:44 p.m.
K
Ocazius 2025-09-29 03:39 p.m.@spedvictor ?
spedvictor 2025-09-29 03:41 p.m.
In class but still searching for lawyer, if deadline comes and I have to go pro-se I will
Ocazius 2025-09-29 04:36 p.m.
Alright, in five hours time, you will then have 48 hours to respond to the motion
Ocazius 2025-09-29 04:36 p.m.
i think i’ve been very fair
mantisshrimp69 2025-09-30 02:23 p.m.4 months ago
Ocazius 2025-09-30 02:45 p.m.@spedvictor
Ocaziusspedvictor 2025-09-30 03:17 p.m.
It’s to my understanding that I have a little over 29 hours to respond, and I plan to respond within the allotted time.
Ocazius 2025-09-30 03:18 p.m.
Ok, just confirming you didn't find counsel
mantisshrimp69 2025-09-30 03:54 p.m.@Ocazius who is supervising you
Ocazius 2025-09-30 04:18 p.m.
It's complicated
Ocazius 2025-09-30 04:18 p.m.
But I write the suggested recommendation ruling since they are busy
OcaziusBut I write the suggested recommendation ruling since they are busy
mantisshrimp69 2025-09-30 05:37 p.m.
Who is
mantisshrimp69 2025-09-30 05:38 p.m.
I think they themselves should see my motion and too consider whether a response is necessary
mantisshrimp69 2025-09-30 05:38 p.m.
In the first place
Ocazius 2025-10-01 02:15 a.m.@Kezzera Mr. Npz would like you to return from Korea to quickly check whether a pro se defendant should be allowed to respond to a motion to dismiss 
Ocaziusspedvictor 2025-10-01 02:19 a.m.
Can I still submit my response
spedvictor 2025-10-01 06:13 a.m.PLAINTIFF’S OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS FOR WANT OF PROSECUTION
@Ocazius @mantisshrimp69
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1pulNC-Zp0OJbUSD25txUpCJ2lUZkw0O5/view?usp=sharing
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-01 06:16 a.m.
1. You didn’t act negligently
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-01 06:16 a.m.
Your counsel didn’t ask questions for days on end whilst he was your attorney
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-01 06:16 a.m.
That lasted literally months
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-01 06:16 a.m.
You did not care to check up on him or didn’t care what he was doing
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-01 06:16 a.m.
2. There was prejudice
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-01 06:16 a.m.@Toby has been on the stand since we started this trial
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-01 06:17 a.m.
I have not been able to defend myself from these accusations that haunt my reputation in six months
mantisshrimp69You did not care to check up on him or didn’t care what he was doing
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-01 06:17 a.m.
I’ll remind you that your past counsels acted very similarly, you’re only showing interest now to claim you’ve been diligent and avoid dismissal
Toby 2025-10-01 06:34 a.m.
holy yap just declare a mistrial or smth
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-01 06:36 a.m.
Dude do something
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-01 06:36 a.m.
This should’ve been dismissed ages ago it’s insane
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-01 06:36 a.m.
Or at least something
spedvictor 2025-10-01 06:44 a.m.@Ocazius Oral motion to give sur-reply in order to address the arguments and claims raised by the Defendant in their reply to my response. Including new claims raised by the Defendant for the first time in their reply.
honkhonk 2025-10-01 06:44 a.m.
-Twirls bailiff baton casually while watching the scene unfold-
spedvictorOcazius 2025-10-01 08:37 a.m.
Denied
Ocazius 2025-10-01 08:38 a.m.
Because I am not recognizing any of their continued outofline speaking.
OcaziusDenied
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-01 01:11 p.m.
Uhm
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-01 01:11 p.m.
You cant do that
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-01 01:12 p.m.
And you don’t need to recognize anything because you cant rule on MTDs
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-01 01:12 p.m.
Or any subreply or reply or anything like that
Ocazius 2025-10-01 02:35 p.m.
Don't remember ruling on an MTD
Ocazius 2025-10-01 02:35 p.m.
But yes, I can do that son.
Ocazius 2025-10-01 02:36 p.m.
What you don't have the right to do, is continue speaking out of line. However, you will soon be addressed, alongside Mr. Xolaaz.
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-01 02:38 p.m.
What would be speaking in line
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-01 02:39 p.m.
Do I need to ask permission to speak
Ocazius 2025-10-01 03:25 p.m.
Yes, you need permission to start complaining about people's documents and providing counter arguments and starting a debate.
Ocazius 2025-10-01 03:26 p.m.
Either you suffer from severe verbal diarrhea or you take things way too heated.
Ocazius 2025-10-01 03:26 p.m.
I'm not inviting you to keep talking
Ocazius 2025-10-01 03:26 p.m.
So I don't know why you're still typing and clogging up my transcript
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-01 03:26 p.m.
You don’t choose to recognize a certain dismissal argument or not because you can’t rule on dismissal altogether
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-01 03:26 p.m.
If I want to make that argument, the one who will decide will be a judge
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-01 03:28 p.m.
Likewise as long as we’re at dismissal you aren’t the one who will choose what arguments can be made or when
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-01 03:29 p.m.
Which is why I’ve already asked who the presiding DC judge is…to no avail
Ocazius 2025-10-01 03:31 p.m.
So what exactly don't you understand from 'I'm not inviting you to keep talking'?
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-01 03:35 p.m.
Everything
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-01 03:35 p.m.
Because like I already said we’re at dismissal and you can’t preside over this kind of thing
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-01 03:36 p.m.
I’d like to know who the DC judge supervising is @Ocazius
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-01 03:36 p.m.
And I will move to disqualify soon
Ocazius 2025-10-01 03:38 p.m.
I don't care if you'd like to know who the DC judge supervising is. You don't ask me that question, receive a response, and then ignore the response and ask me again. If you'd like to know the name of somebody already told to you, scroll up.
OcaziusI don't care if you'd like to know who the DC judge supervising is. You don't ask me that question, receive a response, and then ignore the response and ask me again. If you'd like...
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-01 04:19 p.m. 
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-01 04:19 p.m.
You didn’t answer
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-01 04:19 p.m.
You said it’s complicated and ignored me when I asked again
Ocazius 2025-10-01 04:27 p.m.
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-01 05:09 p.m.@Xerxy @Doogy Can you guys tell me who’s supervising magistrate Ocazius
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-01 05:09 p.m.
He won’t tell me and he apparently insists on ruling on the motion to dismiss himself, which is obviously beyond his authority
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-01 05:10 p.m.
I already stated I’ll move for disqualification but I need the MTD ruled on by the presiding DCJ first
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-02 10:46 a.m.@Xerxy @Doogy
Doogy 2025-10-02 10:52 a.m.
I believe @honkhonk is
Doogy 2025-10-02 10:52 a.m.
for this case
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-02 10:52 a.m.
Alright
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-02 10:52 a.m.@honkhonk I’m moving to disqualify magistrate ocazius soon, meanwhile can you rule on my MTD
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-02 10:53 a.m.
The magistrate doesn’t seem to understand that he has no authority to hear or decide on such motions
mantisshrimp69The magistrate doesn’t seem to understand that he has no authority to hear or decide on such motions
Ocazius 2025-10-02 01:42 p.m.
Could you quickly pull any evidence of this up?
mantisshrimp69He won’t tell me and he apparently insists on ruling on the motion to dismiss himself, which is obviously beyond his authority
Ocazius 2025-10-02 01:42 p.m.
And evidence of this
OcaziusCould you quickly pull any evidence of this up?
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-02 01:43 p.m. 
Ocazius 2025-10-02 01:45 p.m.
Very helpful screenshot
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-02 01:48 p.m.
". . . prior to my dismissal ruling " . . . ."
"I am not making the decision to dismiss a case for want of prosecution unless . . . ."
". . .I will consider dismissal /disqualification . . . ."
"I'm dismissing any dismissal motions . . . ."(edited)
"
". . .
"
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-02 01:48 p.m.
Is that enough evidence your honor
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-02 01:48 p.m.
Im not sure why youre asking me for this
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-02 02:43 p.m.DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO DISQUALIFY AND AFFIDAVIT IN SUPPORT OF MOTION TO DISQUALIFY
@Ocazius @honkhonk @Xerxy
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1L7T7QM0vUniqiYunTkCRgR0JcGiii9NN/view?usp=sharing
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-02 02:44 p.m.DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR CLARIFICATION
@Ocazius @honkhonk @Xerxy
https://drive.google.com/file/d/19xv8wJLHiJ0Tw2A-eT_vHfAUzX3SQhw3/view?usp=sharing
Xerxy 2025-10-02 02:57 p.m.
Sir
spedvictor 2025-10-02 02:57 p.m.
Okay this is ridiculous I will file my opposition within 72 hours the Defendant has just willfully or unknowingly just perjured themselves and/or ignored the Magistrate telling him who the supervising Judge was
spedvictorOkay this is ridiculous I will file my opposition within 72 hours the Defendant has just willfully or unknowingly just perjured themselves and/or ignored the Magistrate telling him...
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-02 03:03 p.m.
Can you show me where the magistrate told me who the supervising judge is
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-02 03:03 p.m.
Not that it matters
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-02 03:03 p.m.
It’s not the point of the motion
spedvictorOkay this is ridiculous I will file my opposition within 72 hours the Defendant has just willfully or unknowingly just perjured themselves and/or ignored the Magistrate telling him...
spedvictor 2025-10-02 03:03 p.m.
cc: @Ocazius @mantisshrimp69
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-02 03:03 p.m.
Just reply to the message
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-02 03:03 p.m.
All he said was “it’s complicated”
spedvictorOkay this is ridiculous I will file my opposition within 72 hours the Defendant has just willfully or unknowingly just perjured themselves and/or ignored the Magistrate telling him...
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-02 03:05 p.m.
I submitted timely. I stated reasonable grounds and showed good cause.
Recusal is not discretionary. Ocaziushas to recuse. What exactly is your response going to add?
Recusal is not discretionary. Ocazius
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-02 03:06 p.m.
You’ll have us wait 72 more hours, delaying this even more, as if the 6+ months weren’t enough
mantisshrimp69Is that enough evidence your honor
Ocazius 2025-10-02 03:25 p.m.
Nope, you have failed to provide me with a statement declaring that I have insisted on ruling on a motion to dismiss.
Ocazius 2025-10-02 03:25 p.m.
Furthermore, I hope you realise that everybody here knows you enough to not take your comments on face value, and actually research the transcripts of what people say, so I'd quit trying to cut statement short out of context, if I were you...
OcaziusNope, you have failed to provide me with a statement declaring that I have insisted on ruling on a motion to dismiss.
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-02 03:32 p.m.
". . . prior to my dismissal ruling " . . . ."
"I am not making the decision to dismiss a case for want of prosecution unless . . . ."
". . .I will consider dismissal /disqualification . . . ."
"I'm dismissing any dismissal motions . . . ."
"
". . .
"
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-02 03:32 p.m.
Does that not say “my dismissal ruling”?
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-02 03:32 p.m.
Are you being for real?
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-02 03:32 p.m.
I’m not cutting anything out of context, these are things you said
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-02 03:33 p.m.
What context would make “I will consider dismissal” not mean “I am going to decide whether to dismiss the case”
OcaziusNope, you have failed to provide me with a statement declaring that I have insisted on ruling on a motion to dismiss.
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-02 03:33 p.m.
Ok well I don’t need one
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-02 03:33 p.m.
I submitted my affidavit
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-02 03:34 p.m.
Again I don’t know why you asked me to do that
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-02 03:34 p.m.
You’re shifting the goalpost but it’s irrelevant to any of my two motions
Ocazius 2025-10-02 03:55 p.m.
Considering that I have written serious contempt referrals for yourself and Mr. Xolaaz for your petty arguments, I will not lower myself to that level and feed into your kick. However, I will advise you to perhaps not let anger cloud your judgement and actually read properly. However, you do you!
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-02 04:21 p.m.
what
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-02 04:22 p.m.
Please just be respectful until this ends and you recuse
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-02 04:22 p.m.
When can I expect clarification @Xerxy @Ocazius
spedvictor 2025-10-02 05:48 p.m.@Ocazius For clarification, am I allowed to write my opposition to the Defendants motion
spedvictor 2025-10-04 05:52 p.m.PLAINTIFF'S OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO DISQUALIFY WITH REQUEST FOR SANCTIONS
@Ocazius @mantisshrimp69
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1OUraeynMh8OkuefK0O5DYMmpyFhJXZeT/view?usp=sharing
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-04 05:59 p.m.
Uhm
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-04 05:59 p.m.
That literally doesn’t matter
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-04 06:00 p.m.
I showed good cause and I was reasonable…the judge is statutorily not allowed to disagree with me
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-04 06:00 p.m.
The fact you think I can be sanctioned for respectfully filing a good faith motion is just insane
spedvictor 2025-10-04 06:12 p.m.@Ocazius Oral motion to give sur-reply in order to address Defendants reply to my response.
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-04 08:15 p.m.@Ocazius ruling when
TobyOcazius 2025-10-05 08:37 a.m.
Hey
Ocazius 2025-10-05 08:37 a.m.
No
Ocazius 2025-10-05 08:38 a.m.
How many times has the court said no to this
Ocazius 2025-10-05 08:38 a.m.
Not helpful at all
spedvictorOcazius 2025-10-05 08:44 a.m.
No need, thanks for asking and being respectful, though.
Ocazius 2025-10-05 09:15 a.m.
Thank you both for your arguments. The Motion to Disqualify is denied.
Ocazius 2025-10-05 09:15 a.m.
As for the Motion to Dismiss, Ms Pueri will rule on that shortly after my recommendation.
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-05 09:15 a.m.
OK, I will be lodging a judicial complaint and referring the motion to disqualify to the chief judge
Ocazius 2025-10-05 09:15 a.m.
Please maintain order until then, unless pressing issues are underway.
mantisshrimp69OK, I will be lodging a judicial complaint and referring the motion to disqualify to the chief judge
Ocazius 2025-10-05 09:15 a.m.
Would you like a written ruling to assist you in that?
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-05 09:15 a.m.
Yes
Ocazius 2025-10-05 09:15 a.m.
Yes, please
Ocazius 2025-10-05 09:16 a.m.
Alright, give me a second
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-05 09:16 a.m.
How long will that take
Ocaziusmantisshrimp69 2025-10-05 09:18 a.m.
This is just lies
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-05 09:18 a.m.
This is you using silly emojis
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-05 09:19 a.m.
You never once told me who the supervising judge is
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-05 09:19 a.m.
Hence my motion for clarification
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-05 09:19 a.m.
In fact no one did
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-05 09:20 a.m.
Nomadity said it might be AshleyPueri, but that he wasn’t sure
OcaziusAs for the Motion to Dismiss, Ms Pueri will rule on that shortly after my recommendation.
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-05 09:20 a.m.
This is the first time you’ve indicated who the district judge in this case is
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-05 09:20 a.m.
Given the obvious lapses in factual apprehension, I move to reconsider
Ocazius 2025-10-05 09:24 a.m.
The court would appreciate more respect in the courtroom. You have already informed the court that you will be filing a judicial complaint and referring the motion to the Chief Judge, and thus it is completely unnecessary to begin accusing the Honourable Magistrate of lying, arguing against the ruling, attempting to provide 'evidence' against it and sending another flurry of messages regarding it. Unfortunately, unlike your peers, I will not be baited into lowering myself to the level of petty arguments in the case channel that (a) clog up the case transcript and (b) lead to absolutely no productive outcome.
For clarification, since you seem supremely confused on this matter of a supervising Judge, I will reiterate here. A case does not have a supervising Judge, a magistrate does. My supervising Judge was originally Singhski. When he resigned, AlbertWellesley assumed the position, hence my previous direct pinging of him when you asked something of my supervising Judge. However, Mr. Wellesley is currently away, so the DCJ who will rule on my motion will be AshleyPueri. She is not my presiding judge, however she will preside over the case solely for the dismissal ruling until Mr. Wellesley's return.
For clarification, since you seem supremely confused on this matter of a supervising Judge, I will reiterate here. A case does not have a supervising Judge, a magistrate does. My supervising Judge was originally Singhski. When he resigned, AlbertWellesley assumed the position, hence my previous direct pinging of him when you asked something of my supervising Judge. However, Mr. Wellesley is currently away, so the DCJ who will rule on my motion will be AshleyPueri. She is not my presiding judge, however she will preside over the case solely for the dismissal ruling until Mr. Wellesley's return.
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-05 09:27 a.m.
I am not “accusing” anyone of lying, nor am I “arguing against the ruling.” I am justifying my motion for reconsideration. In a motion for reconsideration, the movant shows that the judge made an error of factual apprehension in his ruling, and asks him to correct it. It is not disrespectful, it is normal practice. Your conduct—claiming I’m “accusing” you, or “arguing” with you—is one improper attempt at establishing your actions and rulings as infallible. Motions for reconsideration, as I have just done, are procedurally proper, and are not inherently disrespectful, and you should know that.
I thank you for clarifying pursuant to my motion
I thank you for clarifying pursuant to my motion
Ocazius 2025-10-05 09:27 a.m.
Not sure why I said 'the DCJ who will rule on my motion will be AshleyPueri', that meant to say 'the DCJ who will rule on your motion will be AshleyPueri'
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-05 09:28 a.m.
Will you amend your ruling or not
Ocazius 2025-10-05 09:28 a.m.
No, thank you for your move though.
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-05 09:29 a.m.@Doogy Ignore
OcaziusThank you both for your arguments. The Motion to Disqualify is denied.
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-11 03:56 p.m.@vloqsouls Can you review this
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-11 03:57 p.m.
Judge ruled on whether the facts I alleged were true or not in my motion to disqualify
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-11 03:57 p.m.
which is not allowed
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-11 03:58 p.m.
"[N]o man can be a judge in his own case[.]" In re Murchison , 349 U.S. 133, 136 (1955).
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-11 03:58 p.m.
also, the facts are true, so like
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-12 12:57 p.m.@vloqsouls
vloqsouls 2025-10-12 01:24 p.m.
Who is your supervising judge @Ocazius
vloqsoulsWho is your supervising judge @Ocazius
Ocazius 2025-10-12 02:21 p.m.
Nobody
Ocazius 2025-10-12 02:21 p.m.
I don't have a supervising judge, however AshleyPueri is overseeing this case.
mantisshrimp69Ocazius 2025-10-12 02:22 p.m.@mantisshrimp69 Ping Pueri, not Vloqsouls in relation to this please.
Ocazius 2025-10-12 02:22 p.m.
Also reminding him of a ruling.
Ocazius 2025-10-12 02:22 p.m.
(on the Motion to Dismiss)
Ocaziusmantisshrimp69 2025-10-12 02:22 p.m.
Pueri is not a judge
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-12 02:22 p.m.@vloqsouls
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-12 02:22 p.m.
He has no supervising judge, please review his decision
Ocazius 2025-10-12 02:55 p.m.
That's crazy
Ocazius 2025-10-12 02:55 p.m.
You'd think somebody would have the decency to inform me
Ocazius 2025-10-12 02:55 p.m.@vloqsouls Would you like to become this case's supervising DCJ?
Ocaziusmantisshrimp69 2025-10-12 03:00 p.m.
Based on precedent
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-12 03:00 p.m.
He already is
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-12 03:00 p.m.
Since I pinged him
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-12 03:01 p.m.
You ruled as to the facts in my motion for disqualification, in violation of my 14th amendment right to due process
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-12 03:01 p.m.
Your decision is so contrary to law it’s absurd so he will be reviewing it
spedvictor 2025-10-12 03:07 p.m.
Hi im on mobile but I ask that vloqsouls not supervise because he was former counsel on this case
cc@Ocazius @vloqsouls
cc
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-12 03:09 p.m.
Vloq has never in his life been counsel on this case
mantisshrimp69Your decision is so contrary to law it’s absurd so he will be reviewing it
Ocazius 2025-10-12 03:22 p.m.
Alright, please make sure to try and begin conducting yourself with a similar level of calmness and respect, so that this courtroom may be more productive. Whilst I understand that my ruling may have caused distress, I'm sure we can all agree that presenting ourselves in anything but the upmost civil manner, is simply pointless.
spedvictorHi im on mobile but I ask that vloqsouls not supervise because he was former counsel on this case cc @Ocazius @vloqsouls
Ocazius 2025-10-12 03:22 p.m.
I don't believe Vloqsouls has been counsel on this case previously, but please correct me if I'm wrong.
OcaziusAlright, please make sure to try and begin conducting yourself with a similar level of calmness and respect, so that this courtroom may be more productive. Whilst I understand that...
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-12 03:22 p.m.
Yes I'm being respectful and calm
OcaziusI don't believe Vloqsouls has been counsel on this case previously, but please correct me if I'm wrong.
spedvictor 2025-10-12 03:23 p.m.
The law firm that filed the original complaint, was owned my vloq
spedvictor 2025-10-12 03:23 p.m.
And my original counsel was from the same law firm
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-12 03:23 p.m.
Deep Blue Ltd?
Ocazius 2025-10-12 03:24 p.m.
Are you referring to Hamilton & Wexler? This is what I found at the bottom of the first uploaded complaint.
OcaziusAre you referring to Hamilton & Wexler? This is what I found at the bottom of the first uploaded complaint.
spedvictor 2025-10-12 03:24 p.m.
No, James was my second lawyer
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-12 03:24 p.m.
did vloq own Deep Blue
Ocazius 2025-10-12 03:25 p.m.
That's the first civil complaint uploaded on the trello which I can see
Ocazius 2025-10-12 03:25 p.m.
In what way did they represent you? Did they file the case?
Ocazius 2025-10-12 03:25 p.m.
Oh nevermind, I missed a button
Ocazius 2025-10-12 03:25 p.m. 
Ocazius 2025-10-12 03:26 p.m.@spedvictor Are you alleging that Vloqsouls was the Managing Partner of Deep Blue Ltd.?
Ocazius 2025-10-12 03:27 p.m.
I'll just confirm this with the State Bar Licensed Organization database if that's alright
spedvictor 2025-10-12 03:27 p.m.
Thats fine
Ocazius 2025-10-12 03:27 p.m.
Ah yes, it states that he founded it.
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-12 03:29 p.m.
What about @Brenda
Ocazius 2025-10-12 03:29 p.m.@vloqsouls The court lacks a formal dictation on supervising judges on cases and of Magistrates, so I have no official supervising Judge to review this at the moment. I have opened this case to any DCJ wishing to oversee myself, however it seems that a potential COI has presented itself. I can't instruct anything, so you may accept or deny the proposal to oversee this case, in light of this. If not, please let me know so that I may continue my DCJ hunt.
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-12 03:29 p.m.
He can't take it
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-12 03:29 p.m.
Brenda might
vloqsouls 2025-10-12 03:29 p.m.
I'll abstain from this case
Ocazius 2025-10-12 03:29 p.m.
Alright
Ocazius 2025-10-12 03:30 p.m.
Someone needs to codify the supervision of magistracies ASAP
Ocazius 2025-10-12 03:30 p.m.
Well obviously it is codified but not with sufficient instruction
Ocazius 2025-10-12 03:30 p.m.@Brenda Would you be interested in overseeing this?
Ocaziusspedvictor 2025-10-12 03:31 p.m.
I also oppose this because Brenda works at a lawfirm (Bennet, Ellis & Matlock) as a partner with the current witness testifying, who is also a partner at that firm and who was also the former Defendant
Ocazius 2025-10-12 03:32 p.m.
Oh wow
Ocazius 2025-10-12 03:33 p.m.@robert Would you be interested in overseeing this case?
Ocazius 2025-10-12 03:33 p.m.
Struggling to find an available DCJ who hasn't resigned or who doesn't have a conflict of interest
Ocazius 2025-10-12 03:33 p.m.
Nevermind, he's a mag
Ocazius 2025-10-12 03:33 p.m.@bommes Would you?
spedvictorI also oppose this because Brenda works at a lawfirm (Bennet, Ellis & Matlock) as a partner with the current witness testifying, who is also a partner at that firm and who was also...
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-12 03:34 p.m.
The current witness testifying has nothing to do with the motion I'm asking be overseen
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-12 03:34 p.m.
So Brenda can hear it
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-12 03:34 p.m.
There's no conflict
Ocazius 2025-10-12 03:34 p.m.
A supervising judge would not be for a motion, would be for the entire case
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-12 03:34 p.m.
uh no
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-12 03:34 p.m.
check the statute I'm telling you about
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-12 03:35 p.m.
a supervising judge will check if you made a mistake on this motion and that's it
Ocazius 2025-10-12 03:35 p.m.
What statute are you telling me about?
bommes 2025-10-12 03:36 p.m.
Ok someone quickly brief me
bommes 2025-10-12 03:36 p.m.
What’s the issue
bommesOk someone quickly brief me
Ocazius 2025-10-12 03:36 p.m.
Case needs an overseeing DCJ
Ocazius 2025-10-12 03:36 p.m.
All of mine have resigned
Ocazius 2025-10-12 03:36 p.m.
All of the rest have COIs
Ocazius 2025-10-12 03:36 p.m.
Would you be interested in overseeing?
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-12 03:36 p.m.
The case doesn't need a supervising DCJ
Ocazius 2025-10-12 03:36 p.m.
I believe there's a motion to dismiss which needs ruling on, and then Mr. NPZ_V would like a recusal ruling reviewed
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-12 03:36 p.m.
It needs a DCJ to check this one ruling
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-12 03:36 p.m.
That's literally it
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-12 03:36 p.m.@bommes you can do it right now if you want
bommes 2025-10-12 03:37 p.m.
Motions to dismiss can’t statutorily be heard or ruled on by mags (thank the lawmakers)
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-12 03:37 p.m.
Ocazius decided to rule on what parts of my motion were false and which were true
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-12 03:37 p.m.
my motion to recuse
bommesMotions to dismiss can’t statutorily be heard or ruled on by mags (thank the lawmakers)
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-12 03:37 p.m.
you're not a magistrate
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-12 03:37 p.m.
and that's not what I'm asking you to review
bommes 2025-10-12 03:37 p.m.
No I know lol
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-12 03:37 p.m.
review the motion to disqualify
Ocazius 2025-10-12 03:37 p.m.
I'm struggling to understand why you want a temporary DCJ to review a singular issue
Ocazius 2025-10-12 03:37 p.m.
This case needs a permanent DCJ to review all issues that a magistrate statutorily cannot review
Ocazius 2025-10-12 03:38 p.m.
Including the motion to dismiss and all other future motions
OcaziusI'm struggling to understand why you want a temporary DCJ to review a singular issue
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-12 03:38 p.m.
Ok
Ocazius 2025-10-12 03:38 p.m.
Are you objecting to that?
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-12 03:38 p.m.
I don't care honestly I only care that you're out
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-12 03:38 p.m.
And that your absurd ruling is overruled
Ocazius 2025-10-12 03:38 p.m.
Oh right ok
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-12 03:38 p.m.
We can like
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-12 03:38 p.m.
Do the rest later with a new judge
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-12 03:38 p.m.
Right now the priority is that you're disqualified
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-12 03:39 p.m.@bommes Can you quickly review the motion to disqualify and the ruling?
bommes 2025-10-12 03:39 p.m.
Link me
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-12 03:39 p.m.
You'll see the entire basis for denying it is based on that Ocazius disagrees with my factual apprehension
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-12 03:39 p.m.
which he literally cannot do
Ocaziusmantisshrimp69 2025-10-12 03:39 p.m.
ruling
mantisshrimp69mantisshrimp69 2025-10-12 03:39 p.m.
motion
spedvictor 2025-10-12 03:40 p.m.
I ask that the issues awaiting ruling be ruled on in chronological order please
@Ocazius @bommes
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-12 03:40 p.m.
the only issue is the disqualification
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-12 03:40 p.m.
god bless
spedvictorI ask that the issues awaiting ruling be ruled on in chronological order please @Ocazius @bommes
Ocazius 2025-10-12 03:40 p.m.
They both require a District Court Judge sir
Ocazius 2025-10-12 03:40 p.m.
The magistracy is TOO british
spedvictor 2025-10-12 03:41 p.m.
Will my oppositions to the Defendants motions be reviewed too
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-12 03:42 p.m.
it doesn't matter
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-12 03:42 p.m.
because the ruling Ocazius made is contrary to law anyways
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-12 03:42 p.m.
he cannot decide what happened and what didn't
bommes 2025-10-12 03:42 p.m.
Okay shush for one moment
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-12 03:42 p.m.
he'd essentially be presiding over his own case which is unconstitutional
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-12 03:42 p.m.
ok
bommes 2025-10-12 03:43 p.m.
If I get this right, the order is: motion to disqualify
and then just now you’re asking for ocazius’ ruling be overturned
and then just now you’re asking for ocazius’ ruling be overturned
bommes 2025-10-12 03:43 p.m.
I think we can see this as one issue with different branches since this all stems from the motion to disqualify
Ocazius 2025-10-12 03:44 p.m.
I think Plaintiff was referring to the fact that there is a motion to dismiss awaiting ruling, as the other issue
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-12 03:44 p.m.
the motion to dismiss can be dealt with after the motion to disqualify
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-12 03:44 p.m.
which is the more pressing issue
spedvictor 2025-10-12 03:46 p.m.@Ocazius Can I argue here
Ocazius 2025-10-12 03:47 p.m.
I'm not the one who decides the order of what is ruled, you'll have to ask bommes if you have a particular preference
spedvictor 2025-10-12 03:47 p.m.
My internet lagged and the message sent late
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-12 03:54 p.m.@Ocazius you know how motions to disqualify work right
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-12 03:54 p.m.
You can’t be your own judge
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-12 03:54 p.m.
Did you know that
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-12 03:55 p.m.
I put that in my motion and you completely ignored it
Ocazius 2025-10-12 03:58 p.m.
I believe that I previously outlined that there is an official avenue for presenting these arguments, which you certainly know of, as you have summoned a DCJ to review the ruling, and thus there is absolutely no purpose or aim of productivity in attempting to engage in verbal arguments with me regarding a ruling. Please, just wait for an official review which you know is taking place.
spedvictor 2025-10-12 04:00 p.m.
I motion to sanction the Defendant for his conduct, it has gone on for this entire trial and has been unchecked even with the threat of sanctions and an outline of what conduct is not acceptable, which the Defendant has repeatedly ignored
@Ocazius @bommes
bommes 2025-10-12 04:02 p.m.
I’ll get this sorted in an hour or so please refrain from bickering in the meantime
spedvictorI motion to sanction the Defendant for his conduct, it has gone on for this entire trial and has been unchecked even with the threat of sanctions and an outline of what conduct is ...
Ocazius 2025-10-12 04:03 p.m.
Please, there's no need for these sorts of things now, it only adds further confusion and arguments from both sides, which will not allow bommes to efficiently carry out his job. Letters of referral have already been submitted regarding the parties of this case who have continually disrespected each other or committed other sanctionable behaviours.
OcaziusI believe that I previously outlined that there is an official avenue for presenting these arguments, which you certainly know of, as you have summoned a DCJ to review the ruling, ...
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-12 04:14 p.m.
This is part of that review
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-12 04:14 p.m.
I ask you to rationalize your ruling and explain why you think my assessment is wrong
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-12 04:45 p.m.@Ocazius
bommes 2025-10-12 05:23 p.m.
Alright so let’s see here
bommes 2025-10-12 05:24 p.m.@mantisshrimp69 your core argument is that magistrates are statutorily barred from hearing certain motions or conducting certain proceedings. Would that summarise it?
Toby 2025-10-12 05:24 p.m.
bommesmantisshrimp69 2025-10-12 05:27 p.m.
not even cloes
bommes 2025-10-12 05:27 p.m.
sweet
bommes 2025-10-12 05:28 p.m.
rectify it for me
bommes 2025-10-12 05:28 p.m.
I’m trying to make something out of this mess so a good foundation is appreciated
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-12 05:28 p.m.
when a motion to disqualify is submitted
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-12 05:28 p.m.
it has two aspects
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-12 05:29 p.m.
first the factual aspect
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-12 05:29 p.m.
i.e. what I say happened, exactly
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-12 05:29 p.m.
secondly it has the legal aspect
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-12 05:29 p.m.
i.e. whether those facts are sufficient to warrant recusal
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-12 05:29 p.m.
judges are only allowed to evaluate the legal aspect. The facts are always to be assumed as true, even if the judge thinks they're rampantly false
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-12 05:29 p.m.
it's a due process thing
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-12 05:29 p.m.
ocazius is a bad judge and does not know this even though I said it to him
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-12 05:30 p.m.
you'll see he cannot reason with this argument
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-12 05:30 p.m.
but well oh well
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-12 05:30 p.m.
ocazius evaluated the facts, and said everything I claimed was wrong
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-12 05:30 p.m.
1. it was not wrong, everything I claimed was true and you can see that
2. he doesnt have the legal authority to say whether it's true or not, he needs to assume it is(edited)
2. he doesnt have the legal authority to say whether it's true or not, he needs to assume it is(edited)
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-12 05:31 p.m.
for this you can read In re Murchison
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-12 05:31 p.m.
also @spedvictor you're doing yourself the opposite of a favor by opposing this
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-12 05:31 p.m.
because just the fact that ocazius didnt recuse here means everything up to this point can be reversed at appeal
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-12 05:32 p.m.
even if he rules correctly every single time
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-12 05:32 p.m.
so if he ends up granting you relief and ruling in your favor, it's all reversed
bommes 2025-10-12 05:35 p.m.
What I take away from this is that unless the statutes were updated between the date the motion was filed and today, it’s quite clear that while a DCJ may assign a magistrate to carry out (pre)trial proceedings (which shall be construed the same as a magistrate acting sua sponte since they are under the supervision of a DCJ for most of their cases)
5 M.S.C. 1 § 2203 and specifically -2203(f) are clear on this.
However, that does not mean he should be disqualified from this matter as a whole. There is still a supervising judge attached specifically to prevent erroneous interpretations and to intervene if deemed necessary.
5 M.S.C. 1 § 2203 and specifically -2203(f) are clear on this.
However, that does not mean he should be disqualified from this matter as a whole. There is still a supervising judge attached specifically to prevent erroneous interpretations and to intervene if deemed necessary.
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-12 05:35 p.m.
sorry bommes you're not understanding
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-12 05:35 p.m.
this is not about magistracy or about supervising judges
bommes 2025-10-12 05:36 p.m.
bruh
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-12 05:36 p.m.
look
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-12 05:36 p.m.
one second Ill get the statute
bommes 2025-10-12 05:36 p.m.
you wrote a whole motion to disqualify and almost fought him when he tried ruling on a MTD
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-12 05:36 p.m.
yes
bommes 2025-10-12 05:36 p.m.
so like
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-12 05:36 p.m.
he can't rule on mtds
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-12 05:36 p.m.
he needs a supervising judge
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-12 05:36 p.m.
but that is BESIDE what we're doing right now
bommes 2025-10-12 05:36 p.m.
correct
bommes 2025-10-12 05:37 p.m.
ok
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-12 05:37 p.m.
right now all I care about is disqualification
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-12 05:37 p.m.
so Im calling you
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-12 05:37 p.m.
to override his decision
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-12 05:37 p.m.
because it's stupid af
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-12 05:37 p.m.
it shows he did not read a single case about how disqualification and due process works in this scenario
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-12 05:37 p.m.
respectfully
mantisshrimp69because it's stupid af
bommes 2025-10-12 05:37 p.m.
ok that’s not a legally sound argument but I’ll save that for later
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-12 05:37 p.m.
ok here's my legally sound argument
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-12 05:37 p.m.
I submit motion
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-12 05:37 p.m.
I give facts
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-12 05:37 p.m.
he cannot say whether the facts are true or not
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-12 05:38 p.m.
I could be the most liar liar lying liar person ever in the face of the earth
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-12 05:38 p.m.
to have lived
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-12 05:38 p.m.
ever
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-12 05:38 p.m.
but it's too bad
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-12 05:38 p.m.
he has to assume that it's TRUE
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-12 05:38 p.m.
because he cannot adjudicate on his own case
bommes 2025-10-12 05:38 p.m.
I see where you’re coming from
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-12 05:38 p.m.
BASED ON THAT, he needs to evaluate whether the facts
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-12 05:38 p.m.
ASSUMING THEY'RE TRUE
bommes 2025-10-12 05:38 p.m.
victor no, you’ll get your turn later
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-12 05:38 p.m.
give rise to recusal
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-12 05:38 p.m.
that's the issue here
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-12 05:38 p.m.
this review that you're doing is being made under uhhhhhh
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-12 05:38 p.m.
one sec
bommes 2025-10-12 05:39 p.m.
de novo(edited)
bommes 2025-10-12 05:39 p.m.
it’s in the same section I cited
bommes 2025-10-12 05:39 p.m.
somewhere
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-12 05:39 p.m.
5 MSC 1 § 2203.2
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-12 05:39 p.m. 
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-12 05:39 p.m.
This is what ur doing rn
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-12 05:40 p.m.
essentially what ocazius did was rule on whether he believed the facts were true. he's being a judge in his own case, and that's a due process violation, so it needs reversal
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-12 05:40 p.m.
he can only evaluate whether the facts, taken as true, give rise to necessary recusal
bommes 2025-10-12 05:41 p.m.
okay yeah I see your point
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-12 05:41 p.m.
great
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-12 05:42 p.m.
yeah cus this is actually like concerning levels of legal illiteracy
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-12 05:42 p.m.
like if you jump to the facts in a motion instead of reading the entire legal basis section to know how you're legally allowed to rule
bommes 2025-10-12 05:42 p.m.
I’m sorry it’s late and I’m tired lol
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-12 05:42 p.m.
and then just do something that's completely
bommes 2025-10-12 05:42 p.m.
oh you meant the mag
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-12 05:42 p.m.
yes
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-12 05:42 p.m.
that's what he did
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-12 05:42 p.m.
like it's actually concerning
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-12 05:42 p.m.
I considered writing to the judiciary committee since he's up for renomination
bommes 2025-10-12 05:43 p.m.
this is a tough spot to be in
bommes 2025-10-12 05:43 p.m.
mmm
bommes 2025-10-12 05:44 p.m.
now that I’m gonna read up one last time:
bommes 2025-10-12 05:45 p.m.@spedvictor what was it you wanted to say earlier
bommes 2025-10-12 05:53 p.m.
Here’s my solution, I’m not disqualifying him. Rather: I’m claiming this case in its entirety to resolve it in a timely manner.
The manner shall be re-docketed as soon as approval from@Kezzera is acquired
The manner shall be re-docketed as soon as approval from
bommes 2025-10-12 05:54 p.m.
cc: @mantisshrimp69 @Ocazius @spedvictor
bommes 2025-10-12 05:56 p.m.
I am however nullifying the ruling on the motion to disqualify and will deny the motion to disqualify as I am now confident this matter has been adequately handled.(edited)
bommes 2025-10-12 05:57 p.m.
Tl;dr: this case is off his docket and will be reassigned to me
bommes 2025-10-12 05:58 p.m.
…I hope
bommesHere’s my solution, I’m not disqualifying him. Rather: I’m claiming this case in its entirety to resolve it in a timely manner. The manner shall be re-docketed as soon as approval...
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-12 06:00 p.m.
Great
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-12 06:00 p.m.
Best solution
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-12 06:00 p.m.
Thank you, your honor
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-12 07:08 p.m.PAPERLESS ORDER: Defendant's Motion to Disqualify the Trial Judge is DENIED as MOOT. The case is reassigned to Judge bommes as a matter of course due to considerations regarding the timely disposition of the same, and Magistrate Judge Ocazius will not be presiding in this case anyhow. Signed by District Court Judge bommes (Entered: 10/12/2025).
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-12 07:08 p.m.@bommes draft order
bommesI am however nullifying the ruling on the motion to disqualify and will deny the motion to disqualify as I am now confident this matter has been adequately handled.(edited)
Ocazius 2025-10-13 03:32 a.m.
Alright, so there’s now a motion to dismiss which needs ruling on
bommes 2025-10-13 09:51 a.m.
I’m denying the motion to dismiss with prejudice.
cc:@mantisshrimp69 @spedvictor
bommesI’m denying the motion to dismiss with prejudice. cc: @mantisshrimp69 @spedvictor
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-13 12:53 p.m.
Understood
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-13 12:54 p.m.
Can I have a ruling
bommes 2025-10-13 12:58 p.m.
That is a ruling
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-13 12:59 p.m.
Yeah but it doesn’t explain anything
bommes 2025-10-13 01:22 p.m.
oh right, well I agree that a dismissal with prejudice is extreme and that, especially given the plaintiff’s actions in trying to minimise delays however unfortunate those are, it is not sufficient on its own to dismiss the case outright
bommes 2025-10-13 01:22 p.m.
I will however be imposing strict non-negotiable deadlines going forward to minimise the chance of this dragging out even more
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-13 01:28 p.m.@bommes
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-13 01:29 p.m.
I also sought dismissal without prejudice in the alternative
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-13 01:29 p.m.
A lesser sanction that’s not as absolute and final that will make plaintiff reconsider how to go about re-prosecuting the case
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-13 01:29 p.m.
I’d appreciate if that was considered
mantisshrimp69I’d appreciate if that was considered
bommes 2025-10-15 04:32 p.m.
It was, but I am going to impose strict deadlines moving forward to keep this going since it’s put enough of a strain on all parties involved
bommes 2025-10-15 04:33 p.m.
This relates to everything: direct examination, cross examination, motions, whatever requires an action from an active party really
bommesIt was, but I am going to impose strict deadlines moving forward to keep this going since it’s put enough of a strain on all parties involved
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-15 04:35 p.m.
That would make the case go faster moving forward
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-15 04:35 p.m.
It wouldn’t remedy or redress the months of case inactivity I’ve faced
bommes 2025-10-15 04:36 p.m.
Correct
bommes 2025-10-15 04:36 p.m.
And while I am sympathetic, the plaintiff has, in my opinion, done more than the average pro-de litigant in terms of attempting to remedy delays which is something I also kept in mind
Toby 2025-10-16 08:15 p.m.
1
It is with profound regret and the utmost bureaucratic indifference that we announce the untimely demise of Mr. Tobyrulles4568, who was discovered deceased in the witness stand earlier today.
After an admirable tenure of approximately five months upon said stand—during which time no one thought to release, feed, or even meaningfully acknowledge him—he has, alas, succumbed to the inevitable consequences of starvation and institutional oversight.
Initial findings suggest his mortal remains have been in a state of repose (and moderate decay) for an estimated two months. The court extends its sincerest condolences to absolutely no one in particular.
May he rest in the kind of peace that only the judicial process can delay indefinitely.
After an admirable tenure of approximately five months upon said stand—during which time no one thought to release, feed, or even meaningfully acknowledge him—he has, alas, succumbed to the inevitable consequences of starvation and institutional oversight.
Initial findings suggest his mortal remains have been in a state of repose (and moderate decay) for an estimated two months. The court extends its sincerest condolences to absolutely no one in particular.
May he rest in the kind of peace that only the judicial process can delay indefinitely.
1mantisshrimp69 2025-10-16 08:16 p.m.
Watch the trial resume in october 2028
bommes 2025-10-18 09:59 a.m.
right
bommes 2025-10-18 09:59 a.m.@mantisshrimp69 to prevent the witness decaying even further, where were we before these shenanigans
bommesmantisshrimp69 2025-10-18 10:00 a.m.
Trial
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-18 10:00 a.m.
Plaintiff called tobyrulles as the first witness
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-18 10:00 a.m.
He has not authenticated any evidence or asked to admit so far
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-18 10:01 a.m.
But since the very few questions he asked that weren’t sustained on objection are going to be a pain in the ass to find, I suggest we start over
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-18 10:01 a.m.
Since they barely started anyway
bommes 2025-10-18 10:01 a.m.
works for me
bommes 2025-10-18 10:01 a.m.@spedvictor 24 hours to question the defendant, if no questions are posed by then you forfeit the right to question this witness. this went on for long enough
bommes used /timer
clerkFlow Bot2025-10-18 10:01 a.m. Sunday, October 19, 2025 at 10:01 a.m. (3 months ago )
Timer
bommes 2025-10-18 10:01 a.m.
*witness
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-18 10:02 a.m.
Can I ask that we schedule a time in game
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-18 10:02 a.m.
And do it there
bommes 2025-10-18 10:02 a.m.
actually belay that order. we shall schedule a time to get this out of the way in one go
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-18 10:02 a.m.
We can get the entire questioning of the witness done in a matter of minutes instead of an entire day for one question
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-18 10:02 a.m.
So it’s much more efficient yes
bommesactually belay that order. we shall schedule a time to get this out of the way in one go
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-18 10:02 a.m.
May I suggest when2meet your honor
mantisshrimp69May I suggest when2meet your honor
bommes 2025-10-18 10:07 a.m.
Reading my mind are we?
bommesReading my mind are we?
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-18 10:08 a.m.
Yes
bommes 2025-10-18 10:11 a.m.@mantisshrimp69 @Toby @spedvictor You will all be DM'd a link to sign up for when2meet, just put your username and indicate when you are available. Also send this to your witnesses.
I used my timezone so the range is (converted to your timezone):
11:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m. (edited)
I used my timezone so the range is (converted to your timezone):
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-18 10:11 a.m.
Alright
clerkFlow Bot2025-10-18 12:28 p.m. Permissions have been synced to
Channel Permissions Synced
Chambers of Judge bommesbommes used /add
clerkFlow Bot2025-10-18 05:16 p.m. @bommes has added @mantisshrimp69 to the case channel.
Case Modified
bommes used /add
clerkFlow Bot2025-10-18 05:16 p.m. @bommes has added @Toby to the case channel.
Case Modified
bommes used /add
clerkFlow Bot2025-10-18 05:16 p.m. @bommes has added @spedvictor to the case channel.
Case Modified
bommes 2025-10-18 05:17 p.m.@mantisshrimp69 @Toby @spedvictor my bad, you should be able to talk now
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-18 05:19 p.m.
hi
Toby 2025-10-18 05:19 p.m.
round 3
bommesworks for me
spedvictor 2025-10-18 05:22 p.m.@bommes Okay, so for clarification I need to redo the entire line of questioning
bommesspedvictor 2025-10-18 05:49 p.m.
I am also requesting to do this through discord like before as the given range will place me either sleeping, getting ready to go to or already being at school/work depending on the day and time
bommesspedvictor 2025-10-18 05:50 p.m.
I am confident that I could do what is outlined here and meet similar deadlines
spedvictorI am also requesting to do this through discord like before as the given range will place me either sleeping, getting ready to go to or already being at school/work depending on th...
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-18 06:28 p.m.
there's weekends
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-18 06:28 p.m.
do you have school on weekends
bommes 2025-10-18 06:28 p.m.
I am inclined to agree with the defense on that one
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-18 06:34 p.m.
I would be completely open to lenient timeframes and windows for trial
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-18 06:34 p.m.
but at this point I don't think any reasonable person could still think it's viable
spedvictorI am also requesting to do this through discord like before as the given range will place me either sleeping, getting ready to go to or already being at school/work depending on th...
spedvictor 2025-10-18 08:30 p.m.
Its still this same situation for availability during the range of time given
spedvictorIts still this same situation for availability during the range of time given
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-18 10:21 p.m.
Do you have school on weekends
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-18 10:21 p.m.
cus I find that hard to believe
spedvictor 2025-10-19 02:34 a.m.
Wasn't the only reason I stated for not being available
spedvictor 2025-10-19 02:37 a.m.
If you would care to read fully what was stated by me please and thanks
bommes 2025-10-19 06:32 a.m.
We are more or less obligated to do this in-game unless no other option exists.
spedvictorWasn't the only reason I stated for not being available
bommes 2025-10-19 06:33 a.m.
Give me your availability (use timestamps please) and I will see what can be done first.
spedvictorIf you would care to read fully what was stated by me please and thanks
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-19 10:31 a.m.
Okay, since you think you're so clever
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-19 10:31 a.m.
You said at all times given you're either sleeping or going to/being at school
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-19 10:32 a.m.
I intelligently deduced that you're a human, which means your sleep schedule should relatively be somewhat constant, meaning your sleep will be as much of a problem on Saturday as it will be on Friday
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-19 10:32 a.m.
Since there's no way to change that, I moved on to how you have school. I, again, intelligently deduced that you did not have school on weekends from the fact that you are human and we take weekends off.
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-19 10:33 a.m.
Therefore, the only issue on weekends should be your sleep—no other availability issue exists, because you don't go to school
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-19 10:33 a.m.
I did not take your sleep into account for that reason
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-19 10:33 a.m.
Please do tell me how my assessment is wrong
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-19 10:33 a.m.
Additionally I'd like it if the court could ask the defendant to reveal his timezone @bommes
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-19 10:34 a.m.
He is apparently hinting at that his sleep is also an issue at times where it wouldn't be on weekdays, where he'd be at school
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-19 10:34 a.m.
Which makes sense if he likes to sleep in on weekends
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-19 10:34 a.m.
To get a better idea of when he sleeps, his timezone can helps us
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-19 10:35 a.m.
Or he could just. you know, fill out the when2meet that was dmed to him a whole day ago and that he ignored(edited)
Toby 2025-10-19 11:13 a.m.
Actually stfu with the yap
bommes 2025-10-19 11:26 a.m.
Both of you can it, this is why we can’t have nice things
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-19 05:38 p.m.@bommes plaintiff still hasn't filled out the when2meet
bommesGive me your availability (use timestamps please) and I will see what can be done first.
spedvictor 2025-10-19 05:47 p.m.2:30 a.m. to 6:00 a.m. Friday/Saturday/Sunday
spedvictor 2025-10-19 05:48 p.m.
Would be getting home from work around that time
spedvictormantisshrimp69 2025-10-19 06:11 p.m.
it's almost like he sent us a when2meet that you can fill in
spedvictor 2025-10-19 06:11 p.m.
Those times aren't listed on it
spedvictorThose times aren't listed on it
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-19 06:15 p.m.
Okay, this is illogical
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-19 06:15 p.m.
You said you couldn't do the times listed on the when2meet because you either slept or had school during them
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-19 06:15 p.m.
You don't have school on weekends
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-19 06:16 p.m.
Do you have some other activity that happens to perfectly align with your exact school hours?
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-19 06:16 p.m.
Otherwise, the hours you wouldn't have free on weekdays should be free on weekends
spedvictor 2025-10-19 06:41 p.m.
Okay, either you're just ignoring the answer that's been posted already or you're trying to troll me. I am not entertaining your questions that've already been answered, this is exactly the same thing that happened with Ocazius.
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-19 06:42 p.m.
You've barely talked in this channel at all
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-19 06:42 p.m.
What answer
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-19 06:43 p.m.
You said you had school and sleep. You don't have school on weekends. Therefore, you should be available for trial at least sometime in the weekend
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-19 06:43 p.m.
Saying you're universally not available ever (at least to me) just shows you want to prolong the time you'll have to do the trial because you're unexperienced and worry you'll do something wrong in the moment if you're not allowed ample time to make questions
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-19 06:43 p.m.
Which is too bad, because we're at this stage due to your negligence in pursuing the case in the first place, you were given time to find an attorney
mantisshrimp69You said you had school and sleep. You don't have school on weekends. Therefore, you should be available for trial at least sometime in the weekend
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-19 06:44 p.m.
PLEASE, PLEASE tell me how I am wrong. Explain to me how my logic is wrong, because contrary to what you're saying you've never answered me regarding this issue in literally any of your messages
bommes 2025-10-20 07:49 a.m.@spedvictor Please state your timezone
spedvictor 2025-10-20 05:15 p.m.
utc-8
spedvictor 2025-10-20 05:16 p.m.@bommes
bommes 2025-10-20 05:18 p.m.
I see
bommes 2025-10-20 05:18 p.m.
State the times that would work for you, on the weekends.
bommes 2025-10-20 05:20 p.m.
I struggle to believe there’s not a single time that works. There’s 24 hours in a day, let’s say we sleep for 8, work for 8, that still leaves us with 8 hours.
Say you need an hour for eating, an hour to travel give or take, take 2 hours for yourself to unwind. That leaves you with 4 hours to spare.
Say you need an hour for eating, an hour to travel give or take, take 2 hours for yourself to unwind. That leaves you with 4 hours to spare.
spedvictorspedvictor 2025-10-20 05:52 p.m.
They’re listed here @bommes
spedvictor 2025-10-20 05:53 p.m.
Though now that I’m looking at it probably not on Sunday but Friday and Saturday works at those times
spedvictorI am also requesting to do this through discord like before as the given range will place me either sleeping, getting ready to go to or already being at school/work depending on th...
spedvictor 2025-10-20 06:00 p.m.
Sorry for any confusion but the problem for me wasn’t that I was unavailable 24/7, just that there was no availability during the given range as I stated earlier in the replied message
bommes 2025-10-20 06:03 p.m.
What are you doing the rest of those days, if I may enquire. I don’t mean a minute by minute report. It’s just most people I know aren’t out all day every day
bommes 2025-10-20 06:03 p.m.
UTC-8 must be American no?
bommesWhat are you doing the rest of those days, if I may enquire. I don’t mean a minute by minute report. It’s just most people I know aren’t out all day every day
spedvictor 2025-10-20 06:41 p.m.
Are you referring to the weekend when you say rest of those days
spedvictor 2025-10-20 07:00 p.m.
With school specifically the workload and commitments are pretty big as I plan on transferring to one of the top universities in my state which is also the top one for my major so I reasonably have obligatory and personal requirements with my gpa, credit hours and classes to be on top with everything.
And then I have to balance this with full-time work along with the homework, studying and trying to sleep
And then I have to balance this with full-time work along with the homework, studying and trying to sleep
spedvictor 2025-10-20 07:24 p.m.@bommes Also if the questioning is being restarted during trial like what how it was planned a few days ago can I choose a different order of witnesses to testify
spedvictor 2025-10-20 07:26 p.m.
I also respectfully request the subpoena of "SocialSock" for testimony, they are listed as a lay witness in the discovery.
spedvictorI also respectfully request the subpoena of "SocialSock" for testimony, they are listed as a lay witness in the discovery.
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-20 07:39 p.m.
We oppose on grounds of untimeliness
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-20 07:39 p.m.
The trial started 6 months ago, you had time to get in your subpoenas for witnesses
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-20 07:40 p.m.
Subpoenas mid trial are fine…subpoenaing a witness right before you want them to appear 6 months after trial has begun is unacceptable
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-20 07:40 p.m.@bommes
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-20 07:42 p.m.
Also I don’t know if this needs to be said, but the plaintiff has demonstrated that he is unable to pursue this case diligently over Discord and asynchronously. If he cannot pursue it in-game, like a regular trial would be done, then it’s not an issue of scheduling anymore; it’s an issue where this case requires time, and the plaintiff does not have that time . Since he cannot pursue it, he should get a lawyer or drop it.
spedvictor 2025-10-20 07:53 p.m.
You have previously stated that questioning of Toby should be restarted with one of the factors being that the questioning had “barely started”, now you claim that its untimely and that “six months” have passed since the trial had started.
The trial started August 13th, 2025 which was affirmed in your Motion to Dismiss, now you claim that six months have lapsed.
I have availability, which has been stated and as well that I am available to trial with posted times along with me also stating I could confidently do this asynchronously and meet deadlines associated with an asynchronous trial. I’m not completely sure where you get this idea from, I have also been actively pursuing this case. Saying that there are times when trials are “normally” done is a biased statement as people from all timezones and availability play this game.
The trial started August 13th, 2025 which was affirmed in your Motion to Dismiss, now you claim that six months have lapsed.
I have availability, which has been stated and as well that I am available to trial with posted times along with me also stating I could confidently do this asynchronously and meet deadlines associated with an asynchronous trial. I’m not completely sure where you get this idea from, I have also been actively pursuing this case. Saying that there are times when trials are “normally” done is a biased statement as people from all timezones and availability play this game.
spedvictor 2025-10-20 07:54 p.m.
Are you just blatantly lying to the Court and misconstruing context (again) in order to gain the favor of the Judge or what is going on here
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-20 09:26 p.m.
The point at which we are in the questioning of toby is not relevant to whether or not you’ve exercised your due diligence in subpoenaing your other witnesses.
Trial in this case was restarted many times—the moment when you should’ve subpoenaed unwilling witnesses was when the very first trial began. Toby’s questioning is only relevant to the most recent restarted trial, where Ocazius presided. However, it is not “blatantly lying” or “misconstruing context” to say that you should’ve subpoenaed witnesses six months ago, because you should have.
Applying a harsher level of strictness is not “biased” no matter your timezone. You had many attorneys, all of whom were increasingly lazy and did not do the work required, which you knew or should’ve known. In this case, you’ve consistently demonstrated to the court that you are not able to pursue this case at a steady pace in certain settings, and so the court canabsolutely have you do it somehow else, such as in-game.
Trial in this case was restarted many times—the moment when you should’ve subpoenaed unwilling witnesses was when the very first trial began. Toby’s questioning is only relevant to the most recent restarted trial, where Ocazius presided. However, it is not “blatantly lying” or “misconstruing context” to say that you should’ve subpoenaed witnesses six months ago, because you should have.
Applying a harsher level of strictness is not “biased” no matter your timezone. You had many attorneys, all of whom were increasingly lazy and did not do the work required, which you knew or should’ve known. In this case, you’ve consistently demonstrated to the court that you are not able to pursue this case at a steady pace in certain settings, and so the court can
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-20 09:27 p.m.@bommes
spedvictorAre you just blatantly lying to the Court and misconstruing context (again) in order to gain the favor of the Judge or what is going on here
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-20 09:33 p.m.
Further, your honor, I wish to expand upon this statement that is clearly not a rebuttal to my arguments and just an attack on me personally. I would like, if possible, to have plaintiff ordered to show cause (even informally) as to how it is true, and why he said it.
Court arguments are always made to a judge. The arguments can be made in a way that makes them sound directed to the other party, but the purpose is always to let the judge deliberate fairly and respectfully.
Once the case chat is used for plain, baseless accusations solely directed to opposing counsel, with no insight whatsoever that could provide background into a good faith argument, it is no longer an oral argument. It is petty disorder in a courtroom. It is a sorry attempt at influencing a judge by using ad hominem attacks with no true meaning.
Plaintiff has consistently ignored my replies to his erroneous oral arguments once he realized I was right, and so this is perhaps only an attempt at delegitimizing me because he cannot beat me on the merits. I can only guess, but anyhow, this conduct is unworthy of a litigant, as small as it might seem.(edited)
Court arguments are always made to a judge. The arguments can be made in a way that makes them sound directed to the other party, but the purpose is always to let the judge deliberate fairly and respectfully.
Once the case chat is used for plain, baseless accusations solely directed to opposing counsel, with no insight whatsoever that could provide background into a good faith argument, it is no longer an oral argument. It is petty disorder in a courtroom. It is a sorry attempt at influencing a judge by using ad hominem attacks with no true meaning.
Plaintiff has consistently ignored my replies to his erroneous oral arguments once he realized I was right, and so this is perhaps only an attempt at delegitimizing me because he cannot beat me on the merits. I can only guess, but anyhow, this conduct is unworthy of a litigant, as small as it might seem.(edited)
bommes 2025-10-21 04:29 a.m.
Here’s what I’m going to do
bommes 2025-10-21 04:33 a.m.@spedvictor You have a week from now to find an attorney to represent you in this matter, given the apparent fact that you do not have the necessary time to devote to this case (which happens).
This trial has been dragging on for months and any further delay is quite frankly unnecessary and unneeded. If something arises during this time you will contact me ASAP.
Alternatively, you can fill out the when2meet link if you have times that do work for you.
Should no discernible action be taken after this period, I will be forced to dismiss the case without prejudice for want of prosecution, not having the time to pursue a case, regardless of the validity of one’s circumstances, does not mean it can indefinitely drag on.
This trial has been dragging on for months and any further delay is quite frankly unnecessary and unneeded. If something arises during this time you will contact me ASAP.
Alternatively, you can fill out the when2meet link if you have times that do work for you.
Should no discernible action be taken after this period, I will be forced to dismiss the case without prejudice for want of prosecution, not having the time to pursue a case, regardless of the validity of one’s circumstances, does not mean it can indefinitely drag on.
bommes 2025-10-21 04:34 a.m.
Alternatively, the subpoena request is denied as the defense raises a valid point, you had the opportunity to summon them far earlier (assuming the witness list was published months ago) and waited until now to call them
bommes used /continue
clerkFlow Bot2025-10-21 04:35 a.m. This case has been continued; it will be kept on docket until completely finished, a ruling has been made, or until a recess period has ended.
Reason
Case Continued
Plaintiff ordered to seek counsel for representation due to conflicting availability posing a strain on the judicial economy in regards to this case. Plaintiff has one week from this order to find counsel or risk dismissal w/o predjudice.bommes used /timer
clerkFlow Bot2025-10-21 04:36 a.m. Tuesday, October 28, 2025 at 4:36 a.m. (3 months ago )
Timer
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-21 06:33 a.m.
Thank you, your honor
judicialFLOW Bot2025-10-22 04:40 a.m.Requester: @🇮🇱🎗️BurkinabéOperator🎗️
Party:Plaintiff
Channel:kingvictor1000-v-kingley-napely
A Magistrate Judge or higher may approve or deny below. 
Request ID: c51f90f31ca841b28a1b56cca65a1a30 Approve Deny
(edited)
Appearance Request
Party:
Channel:
A Magistrate Judge or higher may approve or deny below.
Status
judicialFLOW Bot2025-10-22 04:57 a.m.@🇮🇱🎗️BurkinabéOperator🎗️ appears for Plaintiff (approved by @bommes ).
judicialFLOW pinned a message to this channel.2026-01-18 03:00 p.m.
bommes 2025-10-22 04:58 a.m.@🇮🇱🎗️BurkinabéOperator🎗️ Greetings, I take it you are counsel for the plaintiff
🇮🇱🎗️BurkinabéOperator🎗️ 2025-10-22 05:09 a.m.
Yes, Your Honor. I am appearing as counsel for the Plaintiff in this matter.
I’d also like to request that my co-counsel@p. and @nooflyw be allowed to appear in this channel as well. We will be working together to ensure that the case proceeds in a way that the Court's time will be respected.
Given that I've just been added to the case, I'd respectfully ask for three days to fully review the filings, evidence, and history of this channel so that both I and my co-counsel can be properly prepared before we continue with the witness examination and remaining trial matters.(edited)
I’d also like to request that my co-counsel
Given that I've just been added to the case, I'd respectfully ask for three days to fully review the filings, evidence, and history of this channel so that both I and my co-counsel can be properly prepared before we continue with the witness examination and remaining trial matters.(edited)
bommes 2025-10-22 05:58 a.m.
Well how do you like that? From zero to three attorneys. Did not expect that
bommes 2025-10-22 05:58 a.m.
Have them file a NoA as well for the sake of procedure. @🇮🇱🎗️BurkinabéOperator🎗️
bommes 2025-10-22 05:59 a.m.
You will have your three days counsel
bommes 2025-10-22 06:02 a.m.
Once that is done I request you three to fill out the when2meet link that I will send you
bommes 2025-10-22 06:10 a.m.
cc:@nooflyw @p.
bommesOnce that is done I request you three to fill out the when2meet link that I will send you
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-22 07:51 a.m.
Only one of them needs to be able to come to trial btw
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-22 07:51 a.m.
Which is great
mantisshrimp69Only one of them needs to be able to come to trial btw
bommes 2025-10-22 07:55 a.m.
I mean I’m not opposed to all 3 but our courtrooms are designed for just 1 so that’s what I’m going with
judicialFLOW Bot2025-10-22 08:04 a.m.Requester: @nooflyw
Party:Plaintiff
Channel:kingvictor1000-v-kingley-napely
A Magistrate Judge or higher may approve or deny below. Request ID: 1bc3840bb58d49be9f24b90f7bd4813e Approve Deny
(edited)
Appearance Request
Party:
Channel:
A Magistrate Judge or higher may approve or deny below.
Status
judicialFLOW Bot2025-10-22 08:10 a.m.@nooflyw appears for Plaintiff (approved by @bommes ).
judicialFLOW pinned a message to this channel.2026-01-18 03:00 p.m.
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-22 10:53 a.m.@p. @nooflyw @🇮🇱🎗️BurkinabéOperator🎗️ can you fill out the when2meet
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-22 10:53 a.m.
pls
nooflyw 2025-10-22 10:54 a.m.
I don't think I've been DM'ed it
nooflyw 2025-10-22 10:56 a.m.
His Honor said he'll send it to counsel after the three days we have to familiarize ourselves with this matter
bommes 2025-10-22 01:54 p.m.
nope I did indeed not send it
bommesbommes 2025-10-22 02:07 p.m.@nooflyw @p. @🇮🇱🎗️BurkinabéOperator🎗️ You have all been sent the link through direct messages. Please fill it out at your earliest convenience. Preferably before the end of this week. It will take 5 to 10 minutes max.
Refer to the replied-to message to see a timestamp conversion of the times in the timetable.
You may ignore the part about witnesses for now.
Refer to the replied-to message to see a timestamp conversion of the times in the timetable.
You may ignore the part about witnesses for now.
bommes 2025-10-22 02:08 p.m.
With 3 attorneys, one ought to make it
nooflyw 2025-10-22 02:11 p.m.
This is for a physical court session in Lander, correct?
nooflyw 2025-10-22 02:13 p.m.@bommes
nooflywThis is for a physical court session in Lander, correct?
bommes 2025-10-22 02:29 p.m.
Correct
nooflyw 2025-10-22 02:41 p.m.
🇮🇱🎗️BurkinabéOperator🎗️ 2025-10-22 08:54 p.m.
I've put my availability in the time table, Your Honor.
bommes 2025-10-23 02:04 a.m.
Now ahead of the proposed trial date of coming Saturday, I’d like to point out that I will not be allowing any new witnesses to be called (that being names that aren’t on the witness list).
If they are on your list but not mentioned here I urge you to seek them out now and have them make their availability be known using the same instructions I provided earlier.
If they are on your list but not mentioned here I urge you to seek them out now and have them make their availability be known using the same instructions I provided earlier.
CC:@🇮🇱🎗️BurkinabéOperator🎗️ @p. @nooflyw @mantisshrimp69
bommes 2025-10-25 07:21 a.m.@spedvictor @Toby @mantisshrimp69 @🇮🇱🎗️BurkinabéOperator🎗️ @nooflyw You have all indicated your availability for today. Looking at the time range that works for everyone I propose we meet at the lander court house Saturday, October 25, 2025 at 4:30 p.m. (edited)
5
5bommes 2025-10-25 07:22 a.m.
Let me know if that works, ping me or click the checkmark
bommes 2025-10-25 12:30 p.m.@🇮🇱🎗️BurkinabéOperator🎗️ @nooflyw contact your client. It’s pretty important he actually attends as this is his case
🇮🇱🎗️BurkinabéOperator🎗️ 2025-10-25 12:35 p.m.
He will be attending, Your Honor.
bommes 2025-10-25 12:36 p.m.
Wonderful
mantisshrimp69 Server2025-10-25 03:07 p.m.
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-25 03:07 p.m.
Can we like not open the doors mid trial
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-25 03:07 p.m.
I see this happen a lot, people constantly go in and out
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-25 03:08 p.m.
If this is going to go well without us getting killed we can’t allow people to go in whenever they want, only at the start
bommes 2025-10-25 03:17 p.m.
I have half the state security forces mobilising, anyone try something stupid they get turned to Swiss cheese
bommes 2025-10-25 03:17 p.m.
But yes I get what you mean
bommesI have half the state security forces mobilising, anyone try something stupid they get turned to Swiss cheese
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-25 03:22 p.m.
Alr great
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-25 03:22 p.m.
I can’t do vc is that ok
bommes 2025-10-25 03:32 p.m.
That’s fine, I’m recording it anyway
Servermantisshrimp69Click to see attachment.
gurt maybe 2025-10-25 03:51 p.m.
magistrate judge donald tremp will be watching this case very closely
Toby 2025-10-25 04:17 p.m.@bommes what server
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-25 04:17 p.m.
b298-405f is best
bommes 2025-10-25 04:17 p.m.@Toby @mantisshrimp69 @🇮🇱🎗️BurkinabéOperator🎗️ @nooflyw @spedvictor
ID: b298-405f
(second biggest server)
ID: b298-405f
(second biggest server)
Toby 2025-10-25 04:17 p.m.
agreed
Toby 2025-10-25 04:18 p.m.
ok
Toby 2025-10-25 04:20 p.m.
here
Toby 2025-10-25 04:21 p.m.@bommes btw if you want people to watch, you may want to tell them its in the second server
Toby 2025-10-25 04:21 p.m.
*if you're
Toby 2025-10-25 04:21 p.m.
*wanting
Tobybommes 2025-10-25 04:24 p.m.
just did, thank you for the reminder tho(edited)
bommes 2025-10-25 04:25 p.m.
is everyone present and/or en route?
Toby 2025-10-25 04:25 p.m.
yes
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-25 04:25 p.m. 
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-25 04:25 p.m.
waiting on you y'r h'n'r
nooflyw 2025-10-25 04:25 p.m.
I'm present and primary counsel for plaintiff just came home
nooflyw 2025-10-25 04:26 p.m.
Plaintiff is enroute as well
bommes 2025-10-25 04:29 p.m.
WHICH DONUT DECIDED TO RESTART THE SERVER
bommesWHICH DONUT DECIDED TO RESTART THE SERVER
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-25 04:29 p.m.
me srry
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-25 04:29 p.m.
I had a big lunch
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-25 04:29 p.m.
where are we doing this then??
bommes 2025-10-25 04:30 p.m.
ID: d455-4aa0
🇮🇱🎗️BurkinabéOperator🎗️ 2025-10-25 04:30 p.m.
Your Honor, my computer is updating... I will be around 5 minutes late. I apologize for this, some unexpected events have come up for me today.
🇮🇱🎗️BurkinabéOperator🎗️Your Honor, my computer is updating... I will be around 5 minutes late. I apologize for this, some unexpected events have come up for me today.
bommes 2025-10-25 04:30 p.m.
You're good, we're forced to move servers as is
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-25 04:30 p.m.@bommes by the way I thought plaintiff wasn't available at ANY of the times they listed
nooflyw 2025-10-25 04:30 p.m.
pretty sure it was 5/5 on this period
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-25 04:30 p.m.
there is a duty of candor here and a possibility that it was breached
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-25 04:30 p.m.
but idk
nooflywpretty sure it was 5/5 on this period
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-25 04:31 p.m.
he never filled out the when2meet because he said he was unavailable
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-25 04:31 p.m.
at every single time
nooflyw 2025-10-25 04:31 p.m.
i remember checking before
bommes 2025-10-25 04:31 p.m.
shrug
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-25 04:31 p.m. 
bommes 2025-10-25 04:31 p.m.
just be glad he is here so we can wrap this thing up
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-25 04:31 p.m.
Bro.
nooflyw 2025-10-25 04:31 p.m.
are we kidding
mantisshrimp69Click to see attachment.
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-25 04:31 p.m.
third server
bommes 2025-10-25 04:31 p.m.
ARE THEY RESTARTING EVERYTHING
bommes 2025-10-25 04:32 p.m.
okay this is ridiculous
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-25 04:32 p.m.
I swear
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-25 04:32 p.m.
to the father
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-25 04:32 p.m.
the son
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-25 04:32 p.m.
and the holy spirit
bommes 2025-10-25 04:32 p.m.@mantisshrimp69 @nooflyw @🇮🇱🎗️BurkinabéOperator🎗️ @Toby @spedvictor I'm postponing this by 10 minutes to ensure there's no more obstructions(edited)
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-25 04:32 p.m.
I have to leave in an hour and a half btw
Toby 2025-10-25 04:32 p.m. 
mantisshrimp69I have to leave in an hour and a half btw
bommes 2025-10-25 04:33 p.m.
Noted
Toby 2025-10-25 04:34 p.m.
lmk when to join
bommes 2025-10-25 04:35 p.m.
will do
gurt maybe 2025-10-25 04:35 p.m.
hello
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-25 04:35 p.m.
is that a transcript
gurt maybe 2025-10-25 04:35 p.m.
maybe it is maybe it isnt
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-25 04:35 p.m.
thats not how transcripts look
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-25 04:36 p.m.
do u want me to send u a format
gurt maybe 2025-10-25 04:36 p.m.
yes
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-25 04:36 p.m.
ok Ill send it later
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-25 04:36 p.m.
im busy rn
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-25 04:36 p.m. 
bommes 2025-10-25 04:36 p.m.
honestly the effort is appreciated nonetheless
bommes 2025-10-25 04:36 p.m.
it's gonna be words, format and it looking pretty is something to worry about later
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-25 04:37 p.m.
yea
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-25 04:37 p.m.
exactly
TobyClick to see attachment.
bommes 2025-10-25 04:37 p.m.
okay according to this, restart should be right about now
Deverus 2025-10-25 04:38 p.m.
clerk's note: restart has been observed. server ID: d455-4aa0 is unaffected.
nooflyw 2025-10-25 04:39 p.m.
bommes 2025-10-25 04:39 p.m.
first server is full and i aint waiting
bommes 2025-10-25 04:39 p.m.@nooflyw @mantisshrimp69 @gurt maybe @Toby @spedvictor @🇮🇱🎗️BurkinabéOperator🎗️ ID: b298-405f
nooflyw 2025-10-25 04:39 p.m.
b298-405f?
nooflyw 2025-10-25 04:39 p.m.
ok
🇮🇱🎗️BurkinabéOperator🎗️ 2025-10-25 04:40 p.m.
ok joining
🇮🇱🎗️BurkinabéOperator🎗️ 2025-10-25 04:40 p.m.
also when i present exhibits during questioning i'm assuming i just post the doc in here seeing as i can't present it in-game
spedvictor 2025-10-25 04:52 p.m.@bommes Currently second in queue to join the server
spedvictor 2025-10-25 04:54 p.m.
Now first in queue
spedvictor 2025-10-25 04:55 p.m.
Now i'm in
🇮🇱🎗️BurkinabéOperator🎗️ 2025-10-25 04:55 p.m.
ok get in and stay seated bcs im questioning toby first(edited)
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-25 04:58 p.m.@bommes can I go check on my car
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-25 04:58 p.m.
a bunch of cars just got blown up
Toby 2025-10-25 05:35 p.m.
“Your Honor, Law Firm A was the original defendant. During the pendency of this case, Law Firm A merged with Law Firm B to form Law Firm C. Under Rule 25(c) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Law Firm C is the successor in interest and now holds all rights and liabilities of Law Firm A. Accordingly, Law Firm C should be substituted as the proper defendant. The former owner of Law Firm A no longer has authority to appear, as that entity no longer exists."
bommes 2025-10-25 05:35 p.m.
I see
🇮🇱🎗️BurkinabéOperator🎗️ 2025-10-25 05:35 p.m.
Your Honor, Rule 25(c) makes substitution optional, not mandatory. The case can continue against the original defendant until the Court orders otherwise. Mr. npz_v can still appear for that predecessor, and the successor’s liability will flow automatically through the merger. There’s no basis to stop or reset these proceedings.
Toby“Your Honor, Law Firm A was the original defendant. During the pendency of this case, Law Firm A merged with Law Firm B to form Law Firm C. Under Rule 25(c) of the Federal Rules of...
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-25 05:35 p.m.
yessers
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-25 05:36 p.m.
btw I believe
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-25 05:36 p.m.
I don't think this is relevant
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-25 05:36 p.m.
but I think clerion changed their name again to hamilton & Wexler
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-25 05:36 p.m.
so just make sure there's no confusion there
OcaziusI note that there is a literal entire section on liabilities, in which it is stated in a clear subsection clause that "Pre-Closing liabilities remain the responsibility of the orig...
nooflyw 2025-10-25 05:36 p.m.
Apparently, the previous judge was given the contract regarding the merger, and such contract contained this provision (referred to in the reply).
nooflyw 2025-10-25 05:37 p.m.
So would the original defendant not be liable?
nooflywSo would the original defendant not be liable?
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-25 05:40 p.m.
we talked about that
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-25 05:40 p.m.
the successor is still liable
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-25 05:40 p.m.
that was a provision on a contract between two law firms
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-25 05:40 p.m.
it only binds the two law firms—not an outside party who is owed money by one of the law firms
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-25 05:41 p.m.
so that portion of the contract is void and unenforceable
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-25 05:41 p.m.
because it essentially transfers the liabilities of a certain somebody without the creditor's signage or consent
bommes 2025-10-25 05:41 p.m.
i am debating declaring a mistrial here due to various procedural issues, albeit without ill intent
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-25 05:42 p.m.
honestly this case is just insane that would make sense
🇮🇱🎗️BurkinabéOperator🎗️ 2025-10-25 05:42 p.m.
i agree
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-25 05:42 p.m.
amazing clark law today though
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-25 05:42 p.m.
it's not everyday you see cases get into the griddy nitty of corporate succession law like this
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-25 05:43 p.m.
or any detailed law in general
bommes 2025-10-25 05:43 p.m.
this case will be deemed a mistrial and the plaintiff may refile the torts addressed to the proper representative
bommes 2025-10-25 05:43 p.m.
i do apologise
mantisshrimp69it's not everyday you see cases get into the griddy nitty of corporate succession law like this
Toby 2025-10-25 05:44 p.m.
so true
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-25 05:44 p.m.
8 months ago I didn't know what a tort was btw
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-25 05:44 p.m.
god bless clark
bommes 2025-10-25 05:46 p.m.
i just found out this thing doesnt even have a case card
bommes 2025-10-25 05:47 p.m.
oh nvm
bommes 2025-10-25 05:47 p.m.
it's still under ocazius
bommes 2025-10-25 05:54 p.m.
there's that
bommes 2025-10-25 05:55 p.m.@🇮🇱🎗️BurkinabéOperator🎗️ @nooflyw @spedvictor very sorry about this, but you may file a new complaint, this will be archived but not deleted and a new case channel will be made so this can be handled properly
bommes 2025-10-25 05:55 p.m.@Your Local Dreamer archive and transcribe please
Your Local Dreamer used /transcript
clerkFlow Bot2025-10-25 05:56 p.m.
Creating transcript..
nooflyw 2025-10-25 05:57 p.m.
shouldn't it be ordered that the case is dismissed without prejudice or something
clerkFlow Bot2025-10-25 05:57 p.m.
https://discord.com/channels/1274202187911790632/1329678726383927409/1431763671129915442 Successfully created transcript.
clerkFlow Bot2025-10-25 05:58 p.m. Permissions have been synced to
Channel Permissions Synced
Volume XIIInooflywshouldn't it be ordered that the case is dismissed without prejudice or something
bommes 2025-10-25 05:58 p.m.
yeah uh I kind of forgot about that but it is
Exported 3652 messages